99savage308
Member
Claymores, barbed wire, Great Danes, and attack cats.
I have seen the 9MM carbine advocated in areas where handgun ownership is restricted. there was an article recently in American Rifleman by a retired SF E-9 on house defense and clearing with an AR-15. In a shotgun birdshot and skeet shot are not to be trifled with a close range. Wide spread, reduced penetration of walls, low recoil. And the shotgun-like a the submachine gun-requires a lot more training than most realize, the effectiveness of "point and pull" is "greatly exaggerated." What really counts is the combat mindset.
The guns are just tools. The mind is the weapon.
Personally, I think BIRDSHOT is a horrendously BAD IDEA for self defense inside a home. If you happen to miss with any of the shot cloud, and any of that shot hits a hard surface, it's liable to ricochet right back into the shooters eyes. STICK WITH BUCK SHOT PEOPLE.
...video below pretty well proves that at across the room distances...shotgun loads...even birdshot... are still in the shot cup when they impact...basically a frangible slug...
Shotgun Ammo for Home Defense - Gunblast.com - YouTube
I've shot bowling pins (at 10 yards) in a match setting with #6 shot and had the shot come right back at me. Video or no video, your choice, I'll stick with personal experience.
I'd probably discount leverguns and single-action revolvers, though.
Why? 10 rounds in a handgun caliber lever gun could be pretty darn effective. Single action revolvers have been used for self defense for a long time. Ever watch a cowboy match? Some of those folks are downright scary good.
IMHO, use what you have, and practice!
diegobxr said:Good morning to you, sir.
Everyone has their own personal preferences, but I don't think there's much to be puzzled about. The shotgun is and has always been one of the most devastating close-quarters anti-personnel firearms available; used by police and military everywhere when trouble is to be expected.
I have a free roaming Rottweiler. Here he is watching Top Gear with me. (The real Top Gear, not the current one. Now we watch The Grand Tour on Amazon.)
While trying to be condescending, you've missed the point. Which is that that shotgun, contrary to popular thinking, is far from a one-size-fits all solution. Its weaknesses are glossed over, its strengths are overestimated, and folks tend to ignore the fact that they can't remember the last time they actually used their shotgun.
Is it good? Yes, if you're an avid shotgunner. If it's been a few years since you've used one, but you practice weekly with a handgun, a pistol or revolver is a much better bet.
Also, isn't complaining about hearing damage after a defensive shooting a bit like pissing and moaning that your seat belt gave you a bruise?
We'll see what happens here.
Killing of 3 teens during burglary may test Oklahoma 'stand your ground' law - Yahoo
Also, isn't complaining about hearing damage after a defensive shooting a bit like pissing and moaning that your seat belt gave you a bruise?
What does a single-action revolver or levergun do, that a double-action revolver or semiautomatic carbine cannot?
Now, what do DA revolvers and semiautomatics do that SAs and levers cannot? Fire more than once in a row.
They may be effective, but they are obsolete. There's no objective reason to select one.
Your first point is valid. Neither is better than the other. Your second point is inaccurate. The firearms just operate differently. Your comment on obsolescence is questionable. The ones most often used are modern firearms. Archaic, maybe anachronistic, but I would argue no less effective. As far as objectivity, I would argue that personal firearm choice is purely subjective. To each, their own.