Houthis 0, US Navy 3

I don't pretend to know everything, but I am not a cultural dwarf either. But until Israel invaded Gaza, I never heard of a Houthi.

I agree, we should have gotten the 4th boat. This is not a time to show restraint. That tactic did not work well for us in Vietnam. If they attack us, show them the path to their honey and virgins
 
I don't pretend to know everything, but I am not a cultural dwarf either. But until Israel invaded Gaza, I never heard of a Houthi.

I agree, we should have gotten the 4th boat. This is not a time to show restraint. That tactic did not work well for us in Vietnam. If they attack us, show them the path to their honey and virgins

The way I see it, limited warfare is a concept born of pandering politicians who lack the intelligence to understand that you cannot shoot something halfway.
 
Wonder if gun camera video/flight data recorder prevented a clean sweep? Knew a couple of CAS guys who'd have managed to have the last boat make a head on run at a helo.

No idea how the various missiles are launched, but doesn't seem like it would be too hard a problem to back track the course to the launch site. Hitting the launch sites would seem to be a way to discourage further launches. Would also seem to be cheaper in the long term than using SA missiles to take out the missiles in flight.

Forum rules prevent further comment.

When this kind of stuff went on back in 2016, the Navy took out all the Houthi's coastal radar sites, causing the problem to cease back then.
 
And now it looks like the USS Gerald Ford carrier task group has been pulled out of the eastern Med to return to the US and many of our so-called "allies" are becoming increasingly less and less interested in, and more and more reluctant to, participating in Operation Prosperity Guardian in the Red Sea. No one wants to upset the Iranians or be seen as supporting the Israelis. Seem like cut and run to me. With allies like that, who needs Iranians and Houthies?
 
Last edited:
Those guys have been out to sea for maybe 250 days or more so they need a break. They missed plenty of holidays. No surprise that we will not be backed up by other nations. We can only depend on GB, Aussies, France and maybe Germany. NATO Command here in Norfolk is just a figurehead.
 
Those guys have been out to sea for maybe 250 days or more so they need a break. They missed plenty of holidays. No surprise that we will not be backed up by other nations. We can only depend on GB, Aussies, France and maybe Germany. NATO Command here in Norfolk is just a figurehead.

Long carrier deployments are wearing on the ship, equipment and crew in numerous ways. Even with the best equipment maintenance and crew health care, long days afloat can and do produce a creeping lethargy or lassitude that is obviously detrimental to efficient ship and flight operations, safety and crew health. And this is so even with fine leadership and a well trained, motivated crew. The longer the time a sea, the longer the turn-around to get equipment and crew re-fitted and rested. My longest deployment afloat was 193 days and we were glad to get home.
 
Last edited:
It's not a tourist paradise, but they're slowly gaining limited governance. They're going to quit security checkpoints in places this month.

On the other hand we had to cancel a major training session because of an in-class typhoid outbreak. Might have been the untreated sewage stream flowing freely along the facility walls.

Remember, if it's PM here, it's mid-AM at your house. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top