How does this impact the fight against restrictive legislation?

[bushmaster1313]

This is being offered as legal under the New York Safe Act:

IMHO, this only adds fuel to the fire in favor of more restrictive legislation.

 

[sgtsandman]

But for now, it works within the existing rules. States like the People's Republic of California and New York will only keep tightening the regulations and limitations as time goes on or unless people start to wise up and use their vote better.

 

[PA Guns & Ammo]

Believe it or not, I would not want to get caught with the rifle in NY. The NY State Police have said the stock is illegal and legal depending on what trooper you ask. In NY, NY State Police make their own laws. Really you say? They cannot do that! We all know they cannot but they do. The law is very vague and it is at the discretion of the officer who may or may not think that it is legal.

 

[LoboGunLeather]

Believe it or not, I would not want to get caught with the rifle in NY. The NY State Police have said the stock is illegal and legal depending on what trooper you ask. In NY, NY State Police make their own laws. Really you say? They cannot do that! We all know they cannot but they do. The law is very vague and it is at the discretion of the officer who may or may not think that it is legal.

This post highlights perhaps the greatest danger to individual liberties, which is laws that are intentionally vague so that officials (elected and appointed) are permitted discretion in application.

The only thing that is worse is laws that empower regulatory agencies to enact rules that carry the force of law without specific legislative actions.

 

[Biggfoot44]

What Lobo said , and it isn't just NY .

But for the OP's question, not really. The Anti's gonna hate, and will peruse their agenda of gradually banning everything regardless.