I Don't Get It, Revolver VS Semi Auto Pistols?

Experiences, or lack thereof, cause an awful lot of statements at the ranges. I've listened to a lot of them, carrying mostly revolvers.

Filled the black with large holes shooting rather quickly one day with a 6" blued 25-2. While reloading, the younger guy next to me said, "Wow, I sure wouldn't want to get shot with that gun."

Unloaded a little more slowly in the same target, and unloaded it. Put the spent AR cartridges up, and said to him, "I wouldn't want to get shot with any gun." The large holes made him think, about what I will never know.
 
when we drop a revolver, we start to cry. When we drop a Glock, we wonder where that can of black spraypaint is. At least I do. Short of that pair of 1911s made out of a nickel-iron meteorite, semi-autos just aren't that valuable. I have lots of them and just plain shoot the snot out of them.

My revolvers, except one, are older than I am, 2 date back to the Civil War. still going bang.
 
I have both and enjoy both revolvers and semi autos. I also shoot both in my IDPA and ASI games. Each gun has their attributes. I do like the simplicity of a revolver and that has led me to DAO, DA/SA semi autos

Bottom line, get what works for you & don't worry about what others say
 
My short answer would be the usual 'different courses; different courses' axiom. That needs to be tempered with evolution, and for evolution to occur, time must pass.

Many of us on here are old enough to have been a part of this evolution, and where we were at the age to get in on the start (for us) of that evolution, that become our comfort zone.

From a professional standpoint, having started with a revolver, that starting point became a reliable comfort zone. I was involved in PPC competition back then, using of course the DA revolver, which further reinforced that comfort zone. DA revolvers were to remain the dominant LE sidearm, I sagely assumed.

My assumption failed to anticipate evolution. By the time we did convert from revolvers to semi-auto pistols I had become convinced they were the superior sidearm.

As far as admiring my sidearm that I carried (example; my S&W 27) that was no longer to be the case, given that ugly matte finished polymer framed semi-autos had taken over. To further the disillusionment, everything the revolver did, the semi-auto did better: They were smaller, lighter and more compact with greater capacity; they could be fired more quickly and accurately due to short, light trigger pulls releasing striker driven firing pins; they could be reloaded rapidly and properly under even the most adverse circumstances; they could remain functional in environments that would stop a revolver, they were as reliable as any firearm could be. (Note: all this assumes proper training and discipline on the part of the shooter).

One of the factors impelling LE to evolve into the use of semi-autos was the crooks. They love them too. The reality today is that LEOs using revolvers coming up against crooks using semi-auto pistols are going to be outgunned. That can't be justified.

I don't condemn younger shooters for having no respect or appreciation for revolvers, because they were too young to be there.

What one carries is always a matter of opinion, and that preference needs no defense.

As much as I still have and still love my revolvers (DA and SA), as well as my older combat and target semi-autos, my carry preference is my compact polymer-framed double stack 9mm. If I were to find something that combines the ergonomics of my current pistol while allowing even greater protection for me and mine, I would have no hesitation in changing.

That is the nature of evolution.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to YouTube gun material, much of it isn't worth watching. Like watching "The View" on TV; good way to lower your IQ without trying very hard. There's an abundance of alleged gun maestros on YouTube.

You have to choose your experts well. A lot of the Youtube "experts" seem to have trouble differentiating their own head from third base.
 
Back
Top