Grayfox
US Veteran
These days I think Taurus in making better revolvers than S&W.
Right now, Colt's quality control is horrible. I've had to send back a new Python for repair and Colt outright replaced my 4" King Cobra Target since it didn't work out of the box.Colt, Ruger and Kimber make better quality revolvers.
Oh, I love my 686-1 very much as well. My Taurus shoots the same cartridges but, if I take a tumble in the hills or drop it, I won't fret as much and it is lighter.I'll stick with my 686...but to each their own
Meh, I own three 686s, 681, and a 586. All were made before 1990. Fantastic guns. The current 686s are not on the same level of quality as the original guns.I'll stick with my 686...but to each their own
My Taurus Model 66 is just as good as my Ruger GP100, Colt King Cobra, and S&W Model 686-3.Oh, I love my 686-1 very much as well. My Taurus shoots the same cartridges but, if I take a tumble in the hills or drop it, I won't fret as much and it is lighter.
I have been a big S & W guy for 50 years, but my Taurus Model 85 Ultralite .38 Special with 2” barrel I bought 20 years ago is the best revolver I own.But who wants to buy a Taurus?
7 yrs ago my FFL took a Taurus revolver in trade for something he had at a gun show. Adjustable target rear sight on it. The top right corner of the "u" on the rear sight was chiped/broken off... This is on the press in "blade". He called Taurus and told them what he needed. They refused to ship either the sight or just the press in blade saying "it's a safety issue". He sent it to them. 7 yrs later, they still have it as "sorry, we haven't made any more of those yet". "And we can't send back a gun that has a damaged sight as that would be a safety issue."
They STOLE his gun and refuse to send it back. I told him I'd make him a new blade and notch it for him. He called Taurus and told them he has a machinist that will make on. They refuse to send it back. I'd guess they lost it years ago. Just this has kept me from buying a Taurus.
I have a HiPoint carbine in 10mm but will not own a Taurus.
The quality in my current production Rossi RP-63 (a Taurus made product) is fantastic for a current production gun on today's market.
View attachment 769671
View attachment 769673
Design wise, it is inspired by S&W.
View attachment 769672
It is a lock free, hammer mounted firing pin, six-shot, 3" .357 Magnum revolver. It is the same size as a Colt D-Frame, which is smaller than a S&W K-Frame.
Best part about it? Cost me less than $450 out the door.
I wish S&W made a gun like this.
Heck the Taurus Model 856 is a six-shot snub-nose .38 and it is smaller than a Colt D-Frame and they make it in an aluminum frame. Unlike Colt right now, their current D-Frame sized guns are only steel framed guns.
That makes no sense. Because when I worked for a FFL, we sent stuff to Taurus for warranty repair. Now, some of the guns, like the PT-99 would be sent in for repair for the busted rear sight.7 yrs ago my FFL took a Taurus revolver in trade for something he had at a gun show. Adjustable target rear sight on it. The top right corner of the "u" on the rear sight was chiped/broken off... This is on the press in "blade". He called Taurus and told them what he needed. They refused to ship either the sight or just the press in blade saying "it's a safety issue". He sent it to them. 7 yrs later, they still have it as "sorry, we haven't made any more of those yet". "And we can't send back a gun that has a damaged sight as that would be a safety issue."
They STOLE his gun and refuse to send it back. I told him I'd make him a new blade and notch it for him. He called Taurus and told them he has a machinist that will make on. They refuse to send it back. I'd guess they lost it years ago. Just this has kept me from buying a Taurus.
I have a HiPoint carbine in 10mm but will not own a Taurus.