That's exactly what i keep hearing. But I don't belive a word of it.Originally posted by jkc:
While it's true that they're not necessarily inaccurate, they are difficult to shoot accurately, for a number of reasons, including short sight radius, light mass vs. trigger pull (i.e., low inertial resistance), fierce muzzle blast, heavy recoil, and so on.
Nicely done neighbor(I'm in Eastpointe)Originally posted by Tom M:
S&W 10-5 2". 30 feet, double action, slow fire.
![]()
I pack a 38 snubby any time I don't pack unconcealed. I can shoot my 4 in mod 28-2, or my 6in.mod 25-5 much better, but when I'm packing cc anything bigger than a paper plate at 15 yds. is in trouble. everything has it's place and purpose.Reply
20 rounds at 21 feet 158gr reloads fired in single action.
anything bigger than a paper plate at 15 yds. is in trouble.
Thanks jkc.Originally posted by jkc:
20 rounds at 21 feet 158gr reloads fired in single action.
Miss Fire, that's a group to be proud of!
Most casual shooters would be hard pressed to achieve that precision with a more manageable handgun, let alone a snubby...
Originally posted by Miss Fire:
that snubbies aren't accurate!
Anyone else feel the same way here?
Originally posted by Dregg:
I never use the sights since studies show most gun fights happen within a distance of 7'.
Originally posted by Ron H.:
Originally posted by Miss Fire:
that snubbies aren't accurate!
Anyone else feel the same way here?
Sir, there's a difference between mechanical accuracy and ergonomics. Many snubbies possess very good mechanical accuracy, but their ergonomics are such that they're harder to shoot well than full-size guns. This is particularly evident when speed is required and distances get longer than across the room.
For example, a well-trained friend of mine regularly shoots both a 642 and a full-size 1911. Shooting slowly and deliberately at 5 to 7 yards, he does slightly better with the .45 than the little .38. But turn on the speed and/or increase the distance, and he does vastly better with the .45. I doubt there's any significant difference in the mechanical accuracy of the two guns. The difference lies in the better ergonomics of the bigger gun--it's simply easier to shoot well.
Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.
Ron H.
Hey, I was going to say that. My 2" is easier to group well at 21 feet than either of my Sigmas. The 40VE is much more accurate at 40,50...Of course, I always shoot a revolver single action style.Originally posted by f150guy:
I find my m10 2" more pleasant to shoot, and a whole lot more accurate than my sigma 9ve, even d/a to dao for whatever that is worth...
But can you hit those targets with a North American Arms in .22LR or .22 WMR