Since gun people are often truck people as well, I thought I'd ask this and tap into the collective intelligence of the forum.
I've got a theory.
We once had a 1987 4wd Toyota truck. In an effort to increase gas mileage, I installed a high flow air intake.
It worked and increased mileage 2 to 3 miles more a gallon. We drove that truck until the bed practically rusted off.
Then we got a 2008 4wd Toyota Tacoma. I did the same thing and installed a high flow air intake, except this time, I got a cold air kit with a hood insulator. It increased performance, did nothing to increase mileage but it sounded cool.
I kinda figured the reason it didn't increase mileage was because the stock intake on the Tacoma was already plenty efficient.
Recently it was smashed into and totaled by an idiot that ran a stop sign on a left turn.
I've been thinking.
The '87 truck had a chrome plated metal pipe that ran across the top of the radiator and no insulation against under hood heat.
The '08 Tacoma had a plastic pipe and insulated against heat.
Hmm.
The metal pipe'd also transfer heat more efficiently that a plastic pipe.
Now we have an '06 Dodge 1500 4wd truck with a 4.7 liter V8.
My theory, if I was to install a shorty free flowing air intake with a metal pipe that wasn't insulated against under hood heat, the incoming air charge'd be warmer and less dense than a cold air charge. The computer'd sense the temperature of the warmer air and inject less fuel.
Thus increasing fuel economy.
A colder incoming air charge'd require more fuel to make up for the increased density of the cooler air.
What do y'all think?
Make sense or just a bunch of silliness?
I've got a theory.
We once had a 1987 4wd Toyota truck. In an effort to increase gas mileage, I installed a high flow air intake.
It worked and increased mileage 2 to 3 miles more a gallon. We drove that truck until the bed practically rusted off.
Then we got a 2008 4wd Toyota Tacoma. I did the same thing and installed a high flow air intake, except this time, I got a cold air kit with a hood insulator. It increased performance, did nothing to increase mileage but it sounded cool.
I kinda figured the reason it didn't increase mileage was because the stock intake on the Tacoma was already plenty efficient.
Recently it was smashed into and totaled by an idiot that ran a stop sign on a left turn.
I've been thinking.
The '87 truck had a chrome plated metal pipe that ran across the top of the radiator and no insulation against under hood heat.
The '08 Tacoma had a plastic pipe and insulated against heat.
Hmm.
The metal pipe'd also transfer heat more efficiently that a plastic pipe.
Now we have an '06 Dodge 1500 4wd truck with a 4.7 liter V8.
My theory, if I was to install a shorty free flowing air intake with a metal pipe that wasn't insulated against under hood heat, the incoming air charge'd be warmer and less dense than a cold air charge. The computer'd sense the temperature of the warmer air and inject less fuel.
Thus increasing fuel economy.
A colder incoming air charge'd require more fuel to make up for the increased density of the cooler air.
What do y'all think?
Make sense or just a bunch of silliness?
Last edited: