BB57, from the first post to this thread, way back when;
A snubby is 2" or less for 10 yards.
A snubby is 3" or less for 25 yards.
I hadn't read through to see if that ever changed. Think I'll have to polish up that 3" model 60!
I've got a much less demanding work and travel schedule now that leaves me home all but 3 days of each pay period, so I'm fixin to get interested in these monthly matches.
I did read a few of the other matches and it's not real clear to what degree barrel length applies.
If you take a literal read on it, then a 2.125" snubby should be fired at 25 yards as is it over 2". For S&W and Ruger purposes that leaves primarily the 1 7/8" LCR and J-frame revolvers (and a smaller number of 2" K-frames) in the 2" / 10 yard class while the 2.125", 2.25", 2.75" and 3" revolvers all fall in the 25 yard class.
In a 25 yard two hand single action match, sight radius is indeed a significant factor. However the shorter the range, the less difference it will make in the overall outcome.
However as a practical matter, I don't think most of us would regard the extra 1/4" sight radius of the 2.125" revolver over a 1 7/8" revolver as having any real advantage even at 25 yards, so it might make sense to define the classes as 2.25" or less and 3" or less. If there is truly a sight radius or accuracy advantage to a 2.75" or 3" snubby over a 2.125" or 2.25" snubby in a match, then it leaves those very common barrel 2.125: and 2.25" barrel lengths at a disadvantage in the 3" class.
As is, it's unclear how 2.125" barrels are classified in some matches. There was for example a recent 3,5,7 and 15 yard match with no mention of barrel length and some 2.125" barrel entries along with the 1 7/8" entries. So it was either a case of counting 2.125" barrels as 2", or a case of barrel length (provided it was 3" or less) not mattering.
It's also maybe a little counter productive to draw the line at 2.0", as that's not the only dimension involved in sight radius. An adjustable sight Model 60 has 1 7/8" from the rear sight to the start of the barrel, while a K-framed sized revolver with adjustable sights will pick up an extra 1/8" of sight radius. That would allow a 2" barrel K frame in the 2" class while the 2.125" barrel J frame is excluded, even thought the sight radius of both revolvers is essentially identical. Plus the K-frame is much heavier, arguably easier to shoot, and somewhat less in keeping with the concept of a small snubby revolver.
However for many matches, like this one where it includes weak hand shooting, I don't think the extra 7/8" or even 1 1/8" of sight radius on a 3" over a 2.125" barrel or 1 7/8" barrel revolver offers any meaningful advantage at 10 yards, particularly as it's the weak hand, DA aspect of the match that is the limiting factor, not the sight radius. In a match like this I'm not sure separate barrel length classes are meaningful - thus the initial question.
I'm just asking for clarification as the issue seems to be a little fuzzy looking at past months, and specifying barrel length as well as any differences in shooting distances in the matches for each month would be helpful, given the variety in the matches. If we don't need to classes, that's a plus as it increases participation and competition in the single class.
And, in a match like this some folks may opt out of the 3" class entirely, given the challenge of hitting a target at 25 yard target at 25 yards in DA mode with the weak hand with any revolver between 2.0 and 3".
------
In any case, I'll plan on re-shooting the 2 3/4" and 3" revolvers at 25 yards - but I expect some people to step up and provide some competition in the 3" class.
I'll also shoot my 1 7/8" Model 36s at 10 yards as well as my 2.125" Model 60 at 10 yards, as I think the .125" extra barrel length is splitting hairs in this particular match.