Buy what you like!
Guns are not investments.
You want to discuss ETFs? Exchange Traded Funds?
Those are investments.
Maybe folks like ramen noodles in retirement


Last edited:
Buy what you like!
Guns are not investments.
You want to discuss ETFs? Exchange Traded Funds?
Those are investments.
I've had to use their warranty 9 times. From everything, from me breaking the guns. Cracking force cones, to fixing canted barrels.
Smith and Wesson customer service and the performance center service department have been exemplary IMO.
In full transparency, I have never had to warranty a J frame, but I do own them. I still feel that the product is covered by them. And have full consumer confidence.
I admit that I do quickly discount forum members allegations of their servicing problems or issues. But Ofcourse! I have to. I'm not them. And I have to go by my "personal " experiences with them and not theirs.
I would not dissuade a potential buyer from buying a new gun , from those service experiences that I have had. For they have been positive and the outcomes were in my favor.
Given my personal experiences with Smith and Wesson. I still have confidence enough to buy a new gun.
I've had to use their warranty 9 times. From everything, from me breaking the guns. Cracking force cones, to fixing canted barrels.
Now, that is what I call serious customer loyalty!Given my personal experiences with Smith and Wesson. I still have confidence enough to buy a new gun.
They aren't so bad.Maybe folks like ramen noodles in retirement![]()
![]()
That's true, Lou. I have sent a couple of my Smiths in for them to work on and one of those was covered by their lifetime service policy and got exemplary service from them, but my last experience was at least 3 years ago. And I am leery of aluminum framed revolvers also and my personal feeling is that I wouldn't own one in a J frame. But it seems that in just the last year or so, we have seen threads posted here where some of the cheaper J frames have been sent back to the mothership with what turned out to be broken hammer studs not being fixed or replaced under the service policy. And most disturbing to me was the "normal wear item" excuse they gave as a reason for not fixing or replacing the gun on their dime. Having a hammer or trigger stud break while the side plate is on and the gun being used is decidedly not a normal wear item to me and I feel for the ones who had S&W pull this on them. I have not read of S&W doing this to a steel framed revolver however. Would I buy a new S&W revolver? You bet ya, if it's something I want. But I would be very hesitant to buy the low end aluminum J frame guns because it sounds to me like if the hammer stud or possibly the trigger stud breaks you are SOL getting it fixed or replaced by S&W.