Is there any love for a Model 43?

That's a good question, which incidentally also applies to the Model 51. My guess is that the answer is just something different to sell, but I wouldn't know what the company's official position might have been - in either case.
 
In my 40 years of casual gunshow/shop peruving Ive seen exactly one in the wild and it was very rough, this does not include the Model 43c which is plentiful near the $750 mark.
On a side note for a shooter with a hammer perhaps the Model 317 makes more sense with its higher capacity, lifetime warranty and silver finish that hides high edge wear much better than black anodizing IMO.

On a side note:
I wonder why SW didnt reduce the barrel shank thread diameter to add thickness to the frame just above the yoke cut.
That is where the airweight frames crack, seems if the metal was thicker it would be much stronger there.
Btw I have a cracked frame 317 so it does happen.
 
I came across a minty Model 43 from the early 1960's for $500 and snatched it. I find it very easy to shoot accurately despite it's light weight. I prefer the the 3.5 inch barrel as it makes the gun proportional to a Combat Masterpiece. I need to take some pics of mine with the original diamond magnas.

Early 1960's M43.webp
 
Typically the purpose of Lightweight models is intended by manufacturers to be carried more than all steel models. Therefore shorter barrels are typically supplied on these for convenience. The 3 1/2" barrel is a good compromise over a 2", by offering greater accuracy potential.

In fact when a 3 1/2" model 43 barrel became available, I replaced the 4" on my all steel Kit Gun and never looked back. It's a great package!
 
Back
Top