It Means What It Says -

NFrameFred

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
3,637
Reaction score
4,693
Location
WV
In my enthusiasm I posted this the other day, thinking it belonged somewhere else (that got me dinged :o) but the Big Gorilla told me to post it here in the lounge with the admonition to responders "to stay off general politics" . . . HIS WORDS EXACTLY.


As much as many want to believe that it is outdated, the Second Amendment to the Constitution was specifically placed in the BILL OF RIGHTS (Inalienable rights we naturally have without question, NOT granted by the government but recognized and codified in the document as PRE-EXISTING and not open to change at the fickle wind of public opinion or governmental abuse)

One of the Founders, Tench Coxe, said when asked what arms the Second Amendment protects, said “Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American.”

Tench Coxe - contemporary of Hamilton, Madison, Jay and other writers of "the Federalist" papers - editorialist, Confederation Congressman, and first assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Hamilton

It is educational, instructive and a valuable use of your time to actually read and study the writings and debates of the day in historical context by such men, as they were well known in their day and the reason many of the things in our Constitution came to be included after much spirited deliberation.

Reading the debates of the time, it is a disservice to many great Americans to think of the Declaration signers as the sole 'founding fathers'.

As upsetting and unpopular as it may be to them, those who today try to conflate the Second Amendment to only the powers and members of the National Guard are woefully and/or willingly ignorant and (in my opinion) are well meaning wishful thinking useful idiots . . . or liars . . . or both.

HOWEVER - those that keep pushing the boundaries of good taste, consideration for their fellow citizen's concerns, and plain old common sense do themselves and the rest of us no favors in fighting some battles that ARE open to debate among folks of good intent; but the original intent is clear - the citizens of this country were intended (indeed, encouraged) to have the will, the means, and the hardware to stand against tyranny at the hands of their own government. And that not to be diminished by popular opinion or government coercion. I feel quite sure the argument that "they gave us the power to change all that at the ballot box without revolution" would not cut much ice with the Founders if they could see how the intent has been subverted and denied by the very government in charge in the modern age we have achieved.

That our representatives and educators actively seek to subvert that intent and misinform the populace on its origin and meanings is criminal.

We must educate ourselves and accept facts that many may find personally disagreeable, but nonetheless true. I find it confounding - comparing gun owners who have bought into some of the propaganda to those in church I have known that profess to believe certain things, but abandon the tenets of that belief and vote their wallets and/or "personal feelings" on such matters instead.

“We Must All Hang Together, or Most Assuredly, We Will All Hang Separately” Benjamin Franklin made this statement at the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Thomas Jefferson said "It does me no harm if my neighbor declares there is no god, or that there are twenty gods . . . it neither picks my pocket or breaks my leg".

However, in this instance, concerning our 'neighbors' in the gun rights community who insist we must compromise on the clear original intent of the Founders, I submit that attitude does, indeed, break all our collective "legs".
 
Register to hide this ad
I couldn't agree more. That being said, I think we need to be real careful with this thread. I think it has the propensity of being on...:)

52xmBZM.jpg
 
My hot button issue is the attempt to subvert the Electoral College as the actual body that elects the President. The average Joe and Jane do not understand Federalism at all, and somehow believe that the Presidency is a national election. They are sadly mistaken as the election is actually 50 statewide contests, so designed by the Founders to prevent the more populous states from steamrolling the less populous states. It causes steam to blow out my ears and foul words to issue from my mouth every time the national pres states that so-and-so should be elected because they garnered more popular votes than the opponent who got more electoral votes.

I believe that IF (I know it will never happen) the pundits on TV would spend time explaining to their viewing audience what the Electoral College is, how it functions and why it was conceived, we might get rid of the absurd idea of a state giving its electoral votes to the candidate with the highest popular vote rather than the one who got the most votes in that state.

I fear for our republic.
 
The Second Amendment is clear in its wording. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are called The Bill of Rights. These recognize individual rights, not government rights. The Bill of Rights was adopted as limitations on our government. This is the only amendment contained in the Bill of Rights that people argue over as to whom it applies. It is also the only amendment that says the individual right may not be infringed.
 
The Second Amendment is clear in its wording. The first ten amendments to the Constitution are called The Bill of Rights. These recognize individual rights, not government rights. The Bill of Rights was adopted as limitations on our government. This is the only amendment contained in the Bill of Rights that people argue over as to whom it applies. It is also the only amendment that says the individual right may not be infringed.

Doug , it can not be stated or explained any better than that. Well done Sir.
 
I know for most here I'm "preaching to the choir", but my hope is more people will actually make the effort to read some of this history. It's appalling how often I hear someone say, as if it's something to be proud of, "I haven't read a whole book since high school!"


No wonder things are in the shape they're in . . . :mad:


From the responses I read here on this forum we have some very well read, educated people. Unfortunately today an 'education' doesn't impart what it used to for many. Again, preaching to the choir . . .
 
I wouldn't mind hosting a couple British soldiers for a few days. As long as they bring lots of stout and Scotch.
 
Words on paper...only as good as the people's willingness to protect and live by it. What I witnessed over the last two years has convinced me that the willingness is fleeting when fear and desire to be safe takes over. And yes, that includes some rabid supporters of the 2nd all too willing to sacrifice the rest.
 
It has ALWAYS AMAZED ME at just how brilliant our Founding Fathers truly were!! It seems they knew 250 years ago what could/would happen down the road. Now the biggest problem we face is obeying and respecting what our Constitution actually says. To spell things out is great but getting people to respect and honor it is difficult these days!
 
Last edited:
The States in Gray have a larger population than Los Angeles County.
The Blue States have less population than Los Angeles County.
 

Attachments

  • A9805C47-82AD-4069-973F-53F4EB1E101D.jpeg
    A9805C47-82AD-4069-973F-53F4EB1E101D.jpeg
    38 KB · Views: 31
Back
Top