Just Got a 686-4 2.5"

jmcisc

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2019
Messages
141
Reaction score
199
Location
SE Florida
I just picked up a 686-4 2.5" that looks to be in very good condition. I've never been a big fan of short barreled revolvers, and don't know much about them. My preference has always been 6" barrels, with an occasional 4".

Any help/information would be greatly appreciated.

It's a long story about how I bought it, but it was an offer I couldn't refuse, being a package deal with a Beretta PX4 Storm subcompact.
 

Attachments

  • S&W 686-4 L Side.jpg
    S&W 686-4 L Side.jpg
    135.2 KB · Views: 238
  • S&W 686-4 R Side.jpg
    S&W 686-4 R Side.jpg
    131 KB · Views: 186
  • S&W 686-4 Serial No.jpg
    S&W 686-4 Serial No.jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 149
Register to hide this ad
I love short-barrelled S&W revolvers, and own a 2-1/2" 686 like yours. They balance well in the hand, and feel great. Expect recoil and muzzle flash to be a little more prominent than on the 4" or 6" models, but other than that, you shouldn't notice any anomalies. If you decide you don't like it, shoot me a private message...there's always room in my safe for another one of these! :)
 
According to the Standard Catalog of S&W, it appears to be a 1994 manufacture. The previous posters are definitely correct when it comes to their assessment of the accuracy of this 2.5" revolver.

They are great shooters, can handle a full diet of .357 magnum. They are a little heavy for carry but, with the right belt and holster, they are a wonderful carry piece.

Hogue grips were standard, beginning in 1993 but, there are several variations and S&W Combat grips are very comfortable. They look fantastic with stag grips as well.

I hold mine in high regard!

Congratulations on your very nice looking 686 2.5" Distinguished Combat Magnum! Enjoy!
 

Attachments

  • fullsizeoutput_113.jpg
    fullsizeoutput_113.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 63
I just picked up a 686-4 2.5" that looks to be in very good condition. I've never been a big fan of short barreled revolvers, and don't know much about them. My preference has always been 6" barrels, with an occasional 4".

Any help/information would be greatly appreciated.

It's a long story about how I bought it, but it was an offer I couldn't refuse, being a package deal with a Beretta PX4 Storm subcompact.

Lucky Dog! That must of been an interesting package deal considering the shorty 686 is worth like...3 PX4 Storms.

I wish I came across package deals like that.
 
Never seen so many 686 snubs!
I thought they were uncommon.
 
I have a three 2.5" 686s, a no dash, dash 3 and a dash 4+ 7 shot. Too bad not all 686s aren't 7 shot.
 

Attachments

  • 9964A1E6-0032-476A-A9E1-A433D79A286D.jpg
    9964A1E6-0032-476A-A9E1-A433D79A286D.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 39
  • 37B2EFC3-10B3-4464-A881-2679971BB648.jpg
    37B2EFC3-10B3-4464-A881-2679971BB648.jpg
    82.3 KB · Views: 36
  • E0F87EE8-9FF4-418D-A23C-3449FF489AD4.jpg
    E0F87EE8-9FF4-418D-A23C-3449FF489AD4.jpg
    109.8 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:
Another member of the short tube 686 club... another poster said that he thought they were scare, in way yes, when trying to find one for sale... but, not scare on this forum, because we're the reason why they aren't out there for sale ;)

Y2mUdmNl.jpg


About the only negative aspect of the 2-1/2 barrel with the shorter ejector rod, sometimes cases don't fully eject, it hasn't been a regular occurrence since I changed from factory combat grips to the slimmer Ahrend combat grips.
 
About 20 years ago I bought a brand new 686 with the 2.5" barrel. It had the S&W factory wood grips that looked very similar to Shark Bait's grips. As usual, back in that day someone wanted it and was willing to pay big to acquire it, so I sold that little jewel of a gun. It is defiantly one of the guns I wished I never sold.
 
Another -4 which is also amazingly accurate...:)


Beautiful examples of wood stocks show above. I could be wrong but I believe rubber stocks were standard on some of these variations.


Mine had a lot of issues when I got it. The trigger pull was so soft misfires were common - someone had "over tinkered" with the main spring and strain screw previously. A new main spring and an "adjusted" strain screw has now returned reliability to flawless at only a modest increase in trigger pull.



 

Attachments

  • IMG-686.jpg
    IMG-686.jpg
    145.1 KB · Views: 29
Back
Top