K22 Masterpiece

Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
13
Reaction score
11
Location
Chicago, IL
Was wondering if anyone has production numbers of how many K22 Masterpiece's were done in nickel? I found a post about 17-3's and that they are around 15 made... This does have a "N" in at least 2 spots..
 

Attachments

  • 56685706_626042567871656_3807149398761144320_n.jpg
    56685706_626042567871656_3807149398761144320_n.jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 180
  • 56606378_651849068597041_5635425304886378496_n.jpg
    56606378_651849068597041_5635425304886378496_n.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 156
  • 56917858_808453142867804_7274932167082246144_n.jpg
    56917858_808453142867804_7274932167082246144_n.jpg
    84.3 KB · Views: 159
  • 57083475_696478930766635_4230510088973975552_n.jpg
    57083475_696478930766635_4230510088973975552_n.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 122
  • 56618711_362454807704828_6841916029610754048_n.jpg
    56618711_362454807704828_6841916029610754048_n.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 101
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I'm sitting in the tub reading this on my iPad (try to get THAT image out of your brain!) so I don't have any literature with me, but I do recall several assertions that ANY nickeled Masterpiece is at least unusual if not downright rare. Shiny surfaces and target shooting are generally not a happy pairing, so very few nickeled target guns were produced. I'm not sure how much of a premium it will bring if sold, but you're sure to be the only kid on you block with a nickel K-22! Congrats! :D

Froggie
 
A letter of authenticity from the SWHF would need to confirm it as a factory nickel gun. You didn't show the N stampings but one on the lower left side of the grip frame would suggest it is original. A rare gun if so.
 
I just read the thread you referenced on the 17-3 guns.
It was in their, that 19 guns total. 3 guns without tt, th, or ts. The other 16 have the 3 t's.
 
few more pics. sorry for quality
 

Attachments

  • 56640182_2291734391138661_4261079608897568768_n.jpg
    56640182_2291734391138661_4261079608897568768_n.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 116
  • 56326526_1322116221285928_8350779207957086208_n.jpg
    56326526_1322116221285928_8350779207957086208_n.jpg
    63.3 KB · Views: 81
  • 56618711_362454807704828_6841916029610754048_n.jpg
    56618711_362454807704828_6841916029610754048_n.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 73
  • 56659793_1083777901818507_4012099796402700288_n.jpg
    56659793_1083777901818507_4012099796402700288_n.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 75
  • 56669488_806719453025507_5444078125233209344_n.jpg
    56669488_806719453025507_5444078125233209344_n.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 63
A letter of authenticity from the SWHF would need to confirm it as a factory nickel gun. You didn't show the N stampings but one on the lower left side of the grip frame would suggest it is original. A rare gun if so.
I'll be sending for letter in couple days. I did add one pic of one of the N's
 
I cannot see the hammer very well, but it catches my eye. The grips are almost positively wrong with the diamond. Almost looks like an old four screw to me.
 
Almost looks like an old four screw to me
It is a five screw gun. You can clearly see the fourth screw in the last picture, and the top sideplate screw in the second photo of the first post. Moreover, you can see that it has right hand threads on the extractor rod. This revolver dates to sometime prior to the middle of 1956.

The grips are almost positively wrong with the diamond
Why would diamond stocks be incorrect? The only question would be whether the gun left the factory before 1953. In that case the stock are incorrect, but not because of the diamond.

It would be nice to know the serial number on this K-22 Masterpiece.
 
I also just noticed the jig hole. That puts it sometime in the 1947 to 1955 range, IIRC.

kevin134
Would you share the serial number with us?
 
It is a five screw gun. You can clearly see the fourth screw in the last picture, and the top sideplate screw in the second photo of the first post. Moreover, you can see that it has right hand threads on the extractor rod. This revolver dates to sometime prior to the middle of 1956.


Why would diamond stocks be incorrect? The only question would be whether the gun left the factory before 1953. In that case the stock are incorrect, but not because of the diamond.

It would be nice to know the serial number on this K-22 Masterpiece.

K231*** I also have a blued K22 that's within 67 sn#'s from the nickel. Both bought at same store, different customers that brought them in. Standard Catalog has both as 1955. Both sets of grips sn'd to the guns.
 

Attachments

  • 20190410_223629.jpg
    20190410_223629.jpg
    56.5 KB · Views: 24
  • 20190410_223633.jpg
    20190410_223633.jpg
    52.2 KB · Views: 24
I also just noticed the jig hole. That puts it sometime in the 1947 to 1955 range, IIRC.

kevin134
Would you share the serial number with us?

ok, what is the jighole?? At this time I'd rather not give out the sn# on the nickel unless absolutely necessary, suffice to say between 231300 and 231500. Until I really know from getting a letter it is in that range...
 
ok, what is the jighole?
You can see it in this picture. It is the hole in the bottom of the grip frame, beside the stock locator pin.
jp-ak-albums-miscellaneous-photos-picture19911-k-22-jig-hole.jpg

These appeared for a while after WWII.

between 231300 and 231500
Yes, most likely a 1955 shipped gun.

Added: the stocks you showed previously are probably original - at the very least, they are period correct. Did you check to see if the number on the inside of the right panel matches the one on the gun?
 
Last edited:
Please let us know what the letter states? If original, it will likely letter as a single gun special order, as suggested by the N stamp.

Also (surprised no one mentioned it yet), there is no K-22 "Target" Masterpiece. They all had Target sights and some with the wide hammer and trigger were labeled "Target" on the box, but it was not a name generally used by the factory.
 
Also (surprised no one mentioned it yet), there is no K-22 "Target" Masterpiece. They all had Target sights and some with the wide hammer and trigger were labeled "Target" on the box, but it was not a name generally used by the factory.

Good, Alan. I decided not to mention it since it has been brought up soooo many times. Sadly, the SCSW perpetuated the false name for a long time. There was an attempt to excise this from the 4th Edition. It wasn't entirely successful, but progress was made.

For those who don't know, the .22 K frame target revolver with a 6" barrel was called the K-22 Masterpiece from 1946 until 1958. Then it became the Model 17 K-22 Masterpiece. "Target" was never part of its name, as Alan has indicated.

The same applies to the K-38, except that in 1958, it became the Model 14 K-38 Masterpiece.
 
Please let us know what the letter states? If original, it will likely letter as a single gun special order, as suggested by the N stamp.

Also (surprised no one mentioned it yet), there is no K-22 "Target" Masterpiece. They all had Target sights and some with the wide hammer and trigger were labeled "Target" on the box, but it was not a name generally used by the factory.

My apologies, I did not know that. Am I correct with my pre 18 being a K22 Combat?
 
Back
Top