Whether a Shield or not, the M&P trigger and firing pin function is the same. The trigger trips the sear, which releases the firing pin from its rest position. The rearward movement is miniscule. For all intents and purposes, M&P is closer to the XD. Single action. The Glock is partially pre-cocked. The M&P is so close it is "splitting hairs" to say that it is not. There is no appreciable difference in the amount of spring compression from its rest position to its position at the moment of release.
As to original question, doesn't S&W recommend replacement of the FP spring every 5,000 rounds or so, at the same time as the mag springs, recoil spring and the trigger return spring (the little coil with the tampon inside)?
As a practical matter, I have never heard of one failing, although we read of plenty of failures to fire with the M&P. Whether those are spring-related or headspace-related is anyone's guess.
Check this out starting at 0:50. I see no discernable rearward movement of the firing pin prior to its release. It is cocked in the usual sense of the word, all ATF classifications aside.
EDIT: I went and looked, and the FP spring is not on the list to change every 5,000 rounds or 5 years, so apparently no real concern here.
[ame]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=syO0mPKOtnw[/ame]