KEEPING THE BLUE VESUS RED DEBATE

THEWELSHM

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
880
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Brandon Sunny Florida
From another forum.....enjoy:D

have posted this before and I hesitate to do so now. This topic always starts a ruckus. It is important to note that BOTH SYSTEMS ARE EXCELLENT! But, they operate differently. You need to choose the press that matches your style. Good Luck!

Which is Better? What's best?

This question usually ignites a firestorm of of "Blue verses Red verses etc." What you are not going to find is very many people that have actually loaded on BOTH DILLON AND HORNADY. I have loaded on the Dillon SDB, 550, 650, 1050 and the Hornady LNL.
I currently own a Hornady LNL and a Dillon SDB.

Here is my perspective:

Consider the Hornady Lock and Load Progressive. It's cheaper than the Dillon and has several features that, IMHO are better than Dillon.

The Dillon has been on the market a long time and have great customer service, as a result, Dillon users are very dedicated to their blue presses. Dillon presses are EXCEPTIONAL and do an exceptional job in reloading. The competition to the Dillon is the Hornady Lock and Load Auto Progressive. Because most of the Dillon users are so satisfied, when you ask the question "Which is better?", you get swamped with comments like, "The Hornady LNL is Junk!" If you asked if they have ever loaded on the LNL and 99.9% said no. When I did find someone that had experience with both presses, most liked the LNL and many had sold their Dillon's and bought the LNL. However, there have been those that sold their red presses and bought blue. I can also unequivocally state, based on my experience, that HORNADY has equal customer service. You just have to decide what you like best. Some times it's just the color, red or blue!!

IMHO the Dillon has one major shortcoming and, most Dillon owners will agree if they are honest. The Dillon powder measure is sorely lacking in ease of use and adjustability. It is sliding bar type measure. It meters ball type powder well but, flake type powder less so. Extruded stick type powder is VERY troublesome and not all that accurate. To be fair, extruded powder is difficult in all powder measures, irregardless of design. Be advised that flake powder has been known to "leak" around the Dillon sliding bar as it is activated back and forth. Particularly if the sliding bar is worn. The LNL powder measure is a rotary barrel design that handles all types of powder MUCH better than the Dillon. A rotary barrel is the same design used by RCBS, Sinclair and other manufacturers. I have never heard of a rotary type measure "leak". Also, it is a pain to swap out the Dillon powder measure to another die plate. As a result, many owners have several powder measures on separate die plates for changing calibers. This significantly drives UP the COST. I have never heard of a LNL owner that has more than one powder measure. There is no need. It is easy to adjust. Many LNL owners, myself included, own several "Powder Dies" that are pre-adjusted to load a specific case. (Note: Powder measure fits into the Powder Die.) Each LNL powder die costs about $20. A Dillon powder measure costs $75.

Also, IMHO, the Dillon de-priming/priming system is less reliable than the LNL. With the Dillon system, spent primers drop through the bottom of the shell plate into a small cup. It is an "open" system and is easy to empty. However, the press gets dirty with carbon. Whenever carbon/dust/dirt or "primer dust" fouls the primer seating station this causes "flipped" or "skipped" primers. The DILLON de-priming system works well provided it is kept CLEAN. With the Hornady LNL, spent primers are dropped completely through the press into a plastic tube and into the trash or bottle or whatever you want to use. It is a "closed" system. You never get carbon in and around the bottom of the shell plate. The point is the dirt off the spent primers does not foul the workings of the press. I have never had a "flipped" primer. Although, I have had "missed" primers that I feel were operator error (ME!) and not the fault of the primer system. (I forgot to seat the primer!) In all fairness, the LNL primer seating station will also not work properly if the primer slide is fouled with dirt or powder. Please note that neither Dillon or LNL primer systems will work flawlessly unless they are adjusted properly. Users of BOTH systems have expressed exasperation with these adjustments.

If you want a "Powder Check" system you need a press with at least five stations. The Dillon Square Deal and Dillon 550 both have 4 die stations. The LNL and Dillon 650 both have 5 stations. However, the 650 costs significantly more than the LNL. The Dillon 1050 is really an industrial machine and has eight stations.

How the presses indexes is an issue for some people. In reading the web about "KABOOMS" (Blowing up a gun!!), many of the kabooms I have read about were directly traced back to a manually indexing press. This is not the fault of the press but, operator error. However, with a manually indexing press, If you get distracted while reloading, you can easily double charge a pistol case. (A double charge will depend on the powder you are using and the charge weight.) IMHO, a double charge is less of a problem with auto-indexing presses. The Hornady LNL, Dillon 650 and, Dillon Square Deal auto index. The MOST POPULAR Dillon press, the 550, is a manually indexing press. Some people prefer manual, some people prefer auto.

In addition, the LNL auto indexing is significantly smoother than the Dillon 650. The LNL indexes 1/2 step while the ram is going up and 1/2 step when the ram goes down. The 650 indexes a full step on the ram down stroke and can cause pistol cases to spill SMALL AMOUNTS or powder with the indexing "bump". IMHO, the LNL is dramatically better. Of course, the amount of powder "bumped" from a case is dependent on the powder charge, operator and, speed of reloading. As I stated above, you get primer problems with a dirty press. "Bumped" powder fouls BOTH Dillon and LNL.

Next, the LNL uses a really slick bushing system for mounting loading dies and powder measure to the press. It makes changing calibers and SNAP. After a die is adjusted for whatever you are loading you can remove the die from the press with an 1/8 turn and insert a different die. Each die has it's own bushing. The Dillon uses a die plate that has the powder measure and all loading dies installed. The Dillon die plate costs more than LNL bushings. Another neat feature with the Hornady is that you can buy a bushing conversion setup and use the same bushings on your RCBS, Lyman or other single stage press and the LNL!

Additionally, the LNL seems to be built like a tank! The ram is about 2"+ in diameter and the basic press is similar in construction to the RCBS Rock Chucker. I would say that a side-by-side comparison to the either the Dillon 550 OR 650, the LNL is at least as sturdily built. And, in some areas I think the LNL is better built. i.e., The massive ram, powder measure, and primer system. The head/top of the press is solid except for where the dies are inserted. The Dillon has a large cutout that is needed for their die plates. By just looking, it would seem the LNL would be stronger. But, of course, that may not be the case.

There is one piece that can get damaged on the LNL. There is a coil spring that holds the cases in the shell holder that can get crushed if you improperly change shell holders. That's the bad news. The good news is that they are only about $2-3 for three and they won't get crushed if you change shell plates correctly. Also, recently Hornady sends these out as a warranty item free of charge. The other good news is that this spring is the primary reason while loading you can easily remove a case at any station. The spring is durable if it is not abused. I have been using my current retainer spring for about 2 years. I have loaded at least 12,000 rounds in that time. With the Dillon you have to remove small individual brass pins in order to take a shell out of a shell plate. My fingers require needle-nose pliers or forceps to remove the brass pins. It is a PITA.

(For the next discussion keep in mind that BOTH DILLON AND LNL shell plates rotate CLOCKWISE.)

Another item to think about. For NON-CASE FEEDER users; all Dillon presses (Except 1050) require you to use BOTH hands to insert brass and bullets on the press. The Dillon 650, 550 and, SDB operates as follows;

1. Right hand inserts an empty case at the right, front side of the press.
2. Left hand then sets the bullet on the case mouth at the left, rear side of the press.
3. Right hand then activates the operating handle.
4. For Dillon 550 only, Left hand manually rotates shell plate.
5. You then release the operating handle and insert another case with your right hand and so forth. (Right, left, right, left, right, left)

(Note: With the Dillon 550 you also have to manually rotate the shell plate at step 4. Most people do this with their LEFT hand.)

With the Dillon, "right-left-right-left" hand operating procedure, clockwise rotation and, the fact that you start your loading process at the front, right side of the press, your bullet seating die is at the rear, left side of the press. Why is this important? The Dillon powder measure drops powder into the case and the case is rotated clockwise to the REAR of the press to the bullet seating die. It is very difficult to see inside of the case to see the gunpowder. Many Dillon owners rig up flashlight, mirror or, believe it or not, a video camera to "look" into the case to see the powder charge.

With the LNL you start your loading process at the REAR, left side of the press. As your case rotates clockwise, after the powder is dropped, your case is directly in the front of the press and the bullet is seated directly in front of the person operating the press. Is is VERY EASY to look directly into the case to see the powder charge. Even though I use a "Powder Check" die. I look directly into each case as I am loading. I have never had a squib load OR a double charge. This is not to say that it can't happen. It can. I just haven't experienced one.

Loading cases and bullets with the left hand is very natural to me. Others may really dislike this feature and prefer the right/left/right/left/right operation of Dillon. Please note that a case feeder eliminates this operation and both Dillon and LNL only load bullets on the left side of the press. Dillon at the back of the press and LNL at the front of the press.

Dillon Customer service is legendary. You can buy a used Dillon press that is a total wreak and they will rebuild or send you a new one for about $40-$50 bucks. Any parts you break will be replaced free of charge. Hornady service, in my experience, is equal. When I needed some replacement springs that broke do to age, Hornady replaced them free of charge. They will also rebuild your press if it needs it. I think most other manufacturers are matching Dillon's service. Dillon raised the bar pretty high for customer service and other companies see how devoted customers are to the BLUE presses. I do feel that is one of the primary reasons Dillon's prices are HIGH. But of course, I have no way of knowing that.

You can load anything on both the Dillon and LNL from .25 ACP to 500 N.E. Realistically, I would say that people with progressive loaders mostly load pistol ammo 99% of the time. After using the LNL, I feel confident that my Grandkids will be using when I'm gone.

In summary, the Hornady LNL has all the features of the Dillon 650 but, is much cheaper. However, the Dillon automatic case feeder is about $50 cheaper than the Hornady. Changing calipers on the LNL is faster and cheaper. The powder measure on the LNL is VASTLY SUPERIOR TO THE DILLON, at least in my opinion. I bought the LNL and am very satisfied. A shooting buddy of mine is a long time, dedicated Dillon user. He has three! After giving me a ration of "stuff" about my choice, he came over and used my LNL and sheepishly said, "That's a very nice setup!!"
__________________
I am the Christian Conservative that CNN warned you about!!
Waldog is offline

Waldog
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Waldog
thewelshm
 
Register to hide this ad
Except straight away, the LNL is cheaper, but only about $75 worth, equip the same way. So "much cheaper", uh, no. For that a 650 gives you superior priming & a better case feeder. That is fact, not subjective. The rest about the to presses is subjective.For me, having loaded quit a Bit on both, comes down to this. If you want a case feeder, buy the 650. If you just want an auto index progressive, buy the then cheaper LNL, & live with the avg priming system.
If you wan anecdotal Sid notes, my buddy owns a LNL with all the bells a whistles. He has used my 650, I have used his LNL. He has made measurements on both. The 650 has more evergreen & tighter tolerances. He wishes he had bought a 650 instead, still may.
 
Last edited:
Hkq3c.gif
 
THEWELSHAM.

A very nice write up review. I have RED and Blue also more than 1 Hornady Powder measure. (I put one on a Dillon too).

I'm about to order a 1050, and will put one on it also.

My coil spring on the LNL shellplate has been in use for 3 years and is still A-OK.

I agree the RED and BLUE are both excellent machines.

Both have their little quarks but so do many things in life.
 
I live in NM. Here the discussion goes Red vs. Green.
Then somebody will mess up the discussion by screaming
'Christmas.'
 
THEWELSHAM.

A very nice write up review. I have RED and Blue also more than 1 Hornady Powder measure. (I put one on a Dillon too).

I'm about to order a 1050, and will put one on it also.

My coil spring on the LNL shellplate has been in use for 3 years and is still A-OK.

I agree the RED and BLUE are both excellent machines.

Both have their little quarks but so do many things in life.


Nice write-up OP, I think its a pretty fair/balanced presentation of a much debated topic. Welshman, I agree about the powder measure, and coil spring on the LnL, both very good designs. I'm wondering if you could provide some information on what it takes to put your Hornady powder measures on your Dillon machines. I'm interested in doing this, and have not read much about how people do it...

I've had the LnL AP for about 6-7 years, and think its a very good machine. Have loaded 10's of thousands of high quality rounds on it. When you have the LnL dialed in correctly, it is really a joy to use, and fast.

That being said, the case feeder can be a PITA to get adjusted correctly; some calibers more so than others. IMO, the feed arm is just not controlled enough to ever be a solid, consistent performer. I have often just wanted to just rip the thing off, and go back to manually feeding the cases, but I'm too stubborn, and put the time in to tweak it, and it generally goes OK.

I like the priming system, but I do run into some issues with it, as well. It has to be kept clean and (dry) lubed, and even then, sometimes it acts up (does not deliver a primer/gets stuck back at the primer tube). I've had runs where everything is just great, and other times where there are some problems; have to break it down, start over, runs good, then sometimes problems again... Other times, no problems...

Otherwise, its a very good, solid set up. Love the bushings, very smooth operation, quick caliber changes. I also love the powder measure, I really don't think you can beat the Hornady powder system. It is very accurate and reliable, and the powder stems are awesome. They are very easy to adjust, and you can get extra ones, for a very minimal cost, and have pre-set adjustments for various loads, if you want...

All this being said, it's my birthday in a few weeks, so I went ahead and bought a Dillon 650 with case feeder. Just wanted to see what all the fuss is about! I have not set it up yet, but will report back once I get it rolling. I can tell you that, compared to Hornady, the Dillon is a much more expensive system, especially if you want convenient caliber changes.

I hear that the case feeder system is much better on the Dillon, so I'm excited to get it going and see for myself. I bought the 650 set up for .45 acp, and will use the LnL for small primer caliber duty.

Quirks aside, I do think the LnL is a no-brainer for someone looking for a high quality progressive press, for a good price, that has some very well thought out features. Without the case feeder, it really is pretty reliable. At the end of the day, I'm glad I have the case feeder, but you just have to be prepared to mess with it a bit to get it running right. If you are not a mechanically inclined person, or lack patience, progressive reloading machines may not be a good thing to get involved with... I don't mind trouble shooting issues, but also am looking for a press that requires less tweaking, so I can spend more time reloading, shooting, and playing with my kids. I hope the Dillon turns out to be that machine. I'll let you know!
 
Last edited:
First off, grats to the OP for a fine write-up.

"Ownership Ego" and sample-to-sample press variations often get in the way of these kinds of comparisons. In this case the OP's analysis seems pretty accurate to me. But like most-maybe-all of you my personal experience doesn't cover anywhere near all one would need to know.

Having said that, there are some elements of the OP that do not match my personal experience. I don't think those things effect his overall thrust, but - since I finished my first box of popcorn - I thought I'd throw a few out there:

" I have never heard of a rotary type measure "leak".":
Certainly true IME with the brands the OP named but, just for the record, 100% NOT true of the Lee Perfect Powder Measure. :)

- "I have never heard of a LNL owner that has more than one powder measure. There is no need. It is easy to adjust.":
Again, mostly true . . . but actually you *have* met one :). I do not like to switch out the pistol and rifle rotors, so I have two Hornady PMs. And, as you mentioned, a quick-change die and PTX Adapter for each caliber. The choices one makes depend on whether you have more money or more time/patience.

- "IMHO, a double charge is less of a problem with auto-indexing presses.":
I fell into this trap a while back, so let's try to set the record straight.

MY UNDERSTANDING is that both the Dillon 550 and the 650 have lockouts that prevent recharging the powder measure until the press has been indexed. MY EXPERIENCE is the Hornady PM can "easily" double charge a case by lowering the ram far enough for a case to clear the PM (but not index) and then raising the ram again.

So while a creative user can always find a way to double charge a case, I think the Dillon 550/650 deserves the nod for going as far as a press can go in preventing double charges.

Am I wrong here?

- "In addition, the LNL auto indexing is significantly smoother than the Dillon 650."
Since the AP can be adjusted to NEVER pop powder from a case on indexing, this is probably true.

But unfortunately it is NOT true with many/most APs as delivered . . . at least judging by forum posts seeking help.

Many APs suffer from either imperfect pawl adjustment, ball-bearings protruding too far out of their shellplates (by far the most likely), and/or tolerance stacking effectively causing a loose shellplate (ie, needing a "shim fix").

Each/all of those can cause the shellplate to slam into its detents despite the half-index on each ram cycle. The result is . . . out of the box . . . the AP will very likely pop powder on most pistol calibers as badly as or worse than the Dillon.

But with one minute per shellplate spent adjusting the ball bearings, powder popping will disappear in almost every case. Some presses will require more time learning how and actually adjusting the pawls . . . and/or some fairly significant effort shimming the subplate.

But powder popping can and should be stopped on your AP, if only because that loose powder can daisy chain into other issues.

It's a shame, really.
 
Last edited:
Last night I loaded 9mm on Both a Hornady LNL, and Dillon 550. Both produced excellent ammo, nary a hitch with either one. I don't have to choose, I like them both.
I only give a slight edge to the extra slot on the LNL for a powder check. I can make it work on a dillon, but I would have to crimp, and seat on one station. I will at some point to see how it come out, but for now, they are both great. I don't think there is any cost savings to either, when you start buying all the extra. I have not put a calculator to it, but I doubt it is much.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top