LAPD folks, S&W 45 Q's

Lots of documented problems with the recent Glocks. Not sure if it's design or increased production (inadequate QC) that is causing the problems.

I've carried Glock since 1998 and am not in any mood to buy a newer one due to these issues. That's what brought me to the 3rd gen section, to study up on them as a potential carry piece. Like Mack said, seems like you have to buy an older gun to get quality any more.
 
First, we've always preferred the .45 here in LA, just hard to get a good one approved for duty use. To be blunt when it comes to shooting people bigger is better

For the person asking, 98% of the Smith .45 being bought and sold in LA are used guns.

As the Glock 22 being dropped in favor of the 17, cost was NOT a factor. Problems with the caliber was the deciding factor.

And the biggest reason HKs are not approved is cost. It's a good weapon but not a truly superior weapon. If it was approved officers would have to buy it out of their own pocket.
 
Curious to what issues the Glock 22 is having? He and his partner both carry the Glock 22, so he was hoping you would post the issues. Thanks

Biggest issue we had was/is excessive breach face erosion. By excessive we had some Academy classes have the slides on their guns replaced by the time they left the Academy.

To some extent this was a function of the Winchester WinClean ammo we used for training. We have since go back to regular ball ammo but the damage to the Glock rep is done.

We had NO Glock bugle/case blowouts.

Other issue was the sharp recoil was having a negative impact on qualification ratios.
 
My department issues the Glocks in 9 mm. Our old Chief could not be talked into a caliber change when we went from the Sig P226 to the Glocks. We can't complain, in that all of our shootings have ended appropriately. The Glocks in 9 mm work fine, although I would prefer a larger caliber (preferably .45). I first carried a Glock in about 1990 at another agency and in .45 ACP. It was a good pistol, and I can't complain. However, it did replace my 4506, and I've missed that pistol ever since.

After 35 years as a cop, I have to say I'd carry a 4506/4566/4516 in a minute, and still have a 4566 and a 1066. Now, with my old butt firmly placed behind a desk most of the time, I might have to consider a light weight, like a 4513, but I be please to go back to the platform.
 
Last edited:
My department issues the Glocks in 9 mm. Our old Chief could not be talked into a caliber change when we went from the Sig P226 to the Glocks. We can't complain, in that all of our shootings have ended appropriately. The Glocks in 9 mm work fine, although I would prefer a larger caliber (preferably .45). I first carried a Glock in about 1990 at another agency and in .45 ACP. It was a good pistol, and I can't complain. However, it did replace my 4506, and I've missed that pistol ever since.

After 35 years as a cop, I have to say I'd carry a 4506/4566/4516 in a minute, and still have a 4566 and a 1066. Now, with my old butt firmly placed behind a desk most of the time, I might have to consider a light weight, like a 4513, but I be please to go back to the platform.

35 years, WOW I thought I was a dinosaur! 20 years here, I started with a revolver in 1988, things sure have changed. I still carry my 4506 (off duty) but as age is setting in I find myself carrying a Glock more often!
Maybe S&W will offer the 4506/4566 in special runs someday, they could sell a boat load! Stay safe everybody!
 
This type of thread is why I signed up here!

Goooooood, useful, informative stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You know, Smith discontinued their Centennial series -- but out of the ashes rose the 640s and 340s.

It was people yelling loud, long, hard -- and in the right ears -- that brought those great guns back.

Jeff Cooper yelling loud, long, hard -- and in the right ears -- brought the 1911 into its rightful place in the nation's mindset for that gun. Before Cooper, 1911s were considered slabs of inaccurate steel right next to hammers in usefulness and respect.

Cowboy action shooting arguably (along with Ruger) saved the old Colt .45 style guns.

The upshot of all this?

Keep hammering Smith on the Third Gens -- show them a steady, consistent profit base that they're missing -- and they'll be hard pressed NOT to bring back the 4500 series -- alongside the 1000 series -- and maybe even the other Third Gens folks love.

Sure, it'll take a while, but they still have the machinery and whatever basics and templates they need. It's a matter of motivation. They don't want to bring back a phased out line -- only to see it flop again.

Money -- and opportunity -- motivate. Departments besides the LAPD HAVE to demand Third Gen guns again. Five or six guns here and there from guys like you and me won't do it. It takes a groundswell of steady demand -- and that's what we have to work at generating.

(Impossible, you say? You've got to remember, Smith said they'd never make 1911s -- and they would have choked to death laughing if you'd have ever predicted they'd be making ARs...)

The takeaway here? Keep up the pressure -- while attempting to build a broad, influential base the way Cooper did with his magazine articles and his bully pulpit !!!!!!!!

If Smith sees Third Gens as a steady, reliable, consistent profit base, these guns will very likely find at least a basic toehold in the Smith line again.

Every business has to keep asking, "What have you done for me lately?" It's the same with Third Gens.

If the Third Gens were still selling -- profitably -- like cool lemonade in H*ll when they first started to be phased out in the early 1990s, the guns never would have gone on hiatus in the first place.

(Oh, yeah, Browning said the Auto-5 was gone forever, too -- and need we mention the Winchester model 70?....)
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top