Rastoff
US Veteran
First let me say that I appreciate all the posts in this thread. They have all been reasonable and intelligent.
What I want to come out of this discussion is a knowledge that you don't have to carry a gun that you can't shoot well just because it isn't modified. The most important aspect of self-defense is to live through the encounter. Everything else is secondary.
I would never ask you to do anything that would violate a trust. However, any case that has not been sealed is a matter of public record. I'm not asking for a quote. If you know a case, tell us what it is and we can look it up ourselves. Even so, I understand why you might not and I'm not trying to pressure you.I can't (by legal restrictions of my job at the time) quote cases. And I can't say that a gun mod put someone in prison who should not have been there.
This is a given. Simple is better.But I will say with certainty that anything "questionable" makes a trial more difficult, and the outcome equally difficult.
Any work will be taken as a modification. By the logic used against modifying your gun, this is still a modification or change from how it came from the factory.I happen to hold the view that your trigger should be within factory specification. That doesn't mean some work can't be done,...
Not necessarily. Both sides get to pick the jury. Unless they can come up with a specific reason to exclude a juror, they can stay. Just being a gun owner would not exclude anyone.Remember, whether criminal or civil trial, the jury will have NO gun owners on it.
This is what should rule our efforts toward protection of self and family.Of course, one must still be alive to attend the hearing.
What I want to come out of this discussion is a knowledge that you don't have to carry a gun that you can't shoot well just because it isn't modified. The most important aspect of self-defense is to live through the encounter. Everything else is secondary.