I'm seeing some ads that have piqued my interest from a provider called CCW Safe. This is new to me and the second provider I've ever seen offering this kind of coverage.
Curious what others think about the idea of carrying liability insurance specifically for self defense or home defense scenarios and if anyone has any experience with providers out there advertising similar types of liability coverage.
I had CCW Safe the past two years, on the defender plan, not the ultimate. Whether it is worth it or not depends on your risk-assessment, budget, and opinions on the terms of the "insurance".
CCW Safe at least admits they are not technically insurance, but rather a legal defense fund. You should take the hour or so it takes to read through all the fine print. I will admit there was stuff in there that made me slightly leery, but after thinking about it, the 209$ was not too much for me at the time (before daycare).
First, lets talk about some of the red flags I found in reading their terms.
1. If you have to defend yourself against someone you invited into your home (not a contractor) then you are NOT COVERED. Now, while we do not ever anticipate having to defend ourselves against a guest, situations have happened where people have a guest for whatever reason who becomes a threat that must be addressed (whether that is too much alcohol, a heated argument turned physical, etc...) just realize you are NOT COVERED even if you are justified in your defense if the person you are defending against was invited to your home.
2. CCW Safe is a legal defense fund, not a get out of a bad decision card. You MUST be keenly aware of ALL state and local laws, CCW Safe WILL NOT COVER YOU if you do not strictly abide by them. Certain states may require you to attempt to retreat, others are stand your ground states. Take a few hours, even a few weeks to review these laws and watch as many educational videos as you can. Learn how to handle yourself legally where you live AND OR where you intend to travel armed.
3. Depending on the plan you choose, there may be ZERO civil liability coverage. My plan covered criminal and civil court costs (among other things) however, only their Ultimate plan covers you for any civil damages you may incur after the trial. Meaning in my plan I could (in theory) be acquitted of criminal charges, while a jury may deem that you are still on the hook for civil damages. This coverage is not something I felt was worth the extra 330$, as I am more worried about other priorities. You may have deeper pockets and different priorities, though.
4. My plan (Defender Plan) covered your spouse, and children inside of the home for legal defensive firearms use, but not outside of it. The Ultimate plan covers them at least partially outside of the home (Check the exact terms, as I have not read them in a few years). This was not a priority for me as my wife will never touch a gun. My kids may someday, but they will not be able to carry outside of the home until they are 21, so the home coverage for them was more than enough for my needs. Your needs may differ, something to consider if your wife carries. I have taken the liberty of posting a link to a review from PewPew Tactical who did a good job comparing the plans and reviewing the service.
CCW Safe Review: The Best? - Pew Pew Tactical
You will find that some are dismissive of the services provided, others swear by them. I am not going to pretend like I am absolutely certain it was worth it to spend 420$ over the past two years for their services I never needed. Anyone who tells you that their services are required is either: A. Lying B. Paid by them C. Deluding themselves D. All of the above.
For what it is worth, after writing all of this, I cancelled my membership. I just felt it was burning 210 dollars for a perception of security that was not actually real. Instead, I have opted to learn more about situational awareness. Most of us can get by with good situational awareness and self-discipline. If there is a mass shooter you have to stop, people will likely be so overwhelmingly on your side (i.e. Elijah Dickens in Indiana) that their coverage will not be required anyways.