As others have indicated, the 41 is a good (not great, IMHO) target gun and extremely accurate, but, but . . . in my experience, most are ridiculously picky about ammo and are prone to malfunctions even with the ammo they shoot best.
I started Bullseye competition over 30 years ago with a 41, and I think I got lucky because my gun, which I still have and shoot from time to time, would feed just about any SV ammo I tried with it, as long as I cleaned it well after just about every match. I still got plenty of practice firing alibi strings. A few years ago I switched to a Walther GSP and the difference in reliability was like night and day. I clean the Walther only about once a year, before the start of the indoor Bullseye season, and only recently had my first FTF after tens of thousands of rounds fired, and it was clearly the fault of the ammo, which apparently had a spot on the rim that didn't get any priming compound.
There are several brands of target guns used by the guys on my current pistol team. I usually call at least one of the lines on any given night and so get to see plenty of alibis over the course of the season - although the 41s make up only about 25% or so of the guns in use, they account for the vast majority of alibis. I know guys who have tried for years to get their 41s to run and, even with the help of good gunsmiths, have finally given up.
I know it's heretical to say it, particularly on this Forum, but I think the 41 is vastly overrated and, compared to the top-of the line Walther, Hammerli and Pardini target guns, rather crude, with a barely adequate trigger (and admittedly less expensive, but still a pretty pricey gun). Sure, they're accurate, but can you really make use of that extra accuracy? If you're shooting High Master scores, probably - but High Masters are very few and very far between. Yes, you can get lucky and find a good one, as I unknowingly did many years ago, but why take that chance when there are so many other options out there?