M&P Shield 9 going back to S&W. Again

Astocks2622

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I bought a brand new Shield 9mm in September 2013, & it bulged my brass terribly. As in beyond salvation for the reloader. It looked to me that the feed ramp was cut too far into the chamber. I sent it in, & when I got it back, the paperwork said they'd "modified" the barrel. Not sure how you can modify an improperly machined barrel... Anyway, it still bulges my brass. Can't tell any difference. Light reloads, factory ammo, +p SD ammo. about 60% of the brass that goes thru the gun bulges, & 90% of the +p...
2vifqr8.jpg

2vnovmd.jpg


guess it's going back yet again, & I'll be specifically asking them to replace the barrel, & shoot some +p out of it...

the real bummer is that the gun is far more accurate than I. this is an 8 shot (full mag) string from 7 yds.
2qmge3n.jpg

hope they can get it fixed.
 
Register to hide this ad
Nice shooting.

Yep, it sounds like you need a new barrel. Did you take any pictures of a round in the chamber? I'd like to see how well supported it is. Did you take any measurements of the chamber?
 
thanks!
I'm currently out of town, so don't have access to my calipers, but I'm not sure what measurement would be indicative of a problem. just measure depth to the lands at the top of the chamber & then at the bottom of the chamber to show chamber encroachment? When I get home next week I can get some measurements.
here's a pic of the round in the chamber.
2wfjvb8.jpg

2ustl47.jpg
 
I've tried to get a good pic of a round in my 9mm barrel:
9mmChamberTest_zpsf3d49c7d.jpg


It looks to me like you are right and the feed ramp is cut too far back on your barrel. Thus, the round is not as supported as it should be. At least yours looks less supported than mine to me.

As far as measurements are concerned, I would at least measure the chamber diameter. If the chamber is too large it will cause the bulged casings like you're seeing. This is the SAAMI specs for a 9mm:
Capture%2525209mm_thumb%25255B4%25255D.jpg

I believe the chamber diameter should be .395" +.010". So, if it's larger than .405" at the chamber mouth, it's too large. If it's smaller than .395" then it's too small, but that won't be the case with yours.
 
yeah, comparing the profile of the feedramps also seems to indicate that mine is cut too deeply. My pics don't show it as well, but look at the sides of the ramp. yours has clear flats. mine is almost a knife edge.
1219zep.jpg

also, looking at that drawing, wouldn't the chamber be .391 +.010? the .394 should be the rim, which doesn't go in the chamber, right?
 
Last edited:
also, looking at that drawing, wouldn't the chamber be .391 +.010? the .394 should be the rim, which doesn't go in the chamber, right?
Well, I don't know the exact dimensions for the chamber, but I would imagine they would make them at least .003"-.005" larger than the round. So, about .395" +.010" (which is the standard tolerance on that sheet) seems about right to me. I could be wrong.

Let me go measure mine and see what it comes to.

EDIT:
OK, I measured my chamber at the breech with my ultra high dollar ($25) digital calipers that I haven't calibrated in at least two years (I am a Metrologist by trade so I really did calibrate my calipers), and got a measurement of .391". So, I concede that it may indeed be .391" for the chamber at the breech end. In all honesty, any difference of .005" or so won't make any difference to the casing. That miss-cut feed ramp is another issue altogether.
 
Last edited:
yep, that sounds right. I'm an aircraft mechanic by trade, so my calipers (also around $25) are calibrated yearly... we'll see what it is when I get back into town.
thanks for the offer to email the pic. The one you posted here was big enough for me just to save a copy of it :D I'll keep you posted on what action S&W takes & if they fix the problem.
 
Astocks2622, your chamber has been destroyed by someone who did not know what they were doing. No way would I fire a round in that barrel.
 
Astocks, has the nickel plating or case actually split on those bulged fired casings!? I can't believe they had that and sent it back that way.
 
yeah, well the info that came back with the gun the first time was pretty vague as to work performed. there was simply a box marked "barrel modification". I called S&W to get some clarification, but the CS person I got said that the smith just has a computer code system for reporting work done. it's not a written log. so they might have actually done some work to the barrel, or they may have replaced the barrel, & that was the computer code the smith used. so basically, even S&W doesn't know for sure what they did last time.
That's why I'll be specifying exactly what I want done.
 
I would send that pistol back with a few spent cases of factory ammo to show the bulge. Also tell them to fire the pistol and check the results. That is a catastrophic failure/kaboom waiting to happen and stress to them it is a safety issue and the liability is on them. That should get results. If they can't correct the problem S&W owes you a new pistol. Bill
 
That's what I did the first time... I guess I'll just have to be more emphatic.
 
Odd

My Son and I just got 2 new Shields 9mm
I bought mine at the local Gander Mountain
We got his from a dealer here on the forums.

Now My spent shell that came with the pistol looked good
My sons on the other hand had a bulge.
needless to say, this put us on alert for todays shoot.

Both guns spent brass, that bulges like this
We put about 50 rounds each thru the guns.
We collected 23 rounds of his 13 had a bulge and 10 looked ok
So 50/50

Guns shot as expected. we are happy from that standpoint.
My son is setting up to clean them now.

So you can see at the bottom of the chamber it is coated with gunpowder residue where the shell bulges. This is on both pistols
 
Last edited:
S&W just sent me a shipping label for me to send it back to the mothership again. We'll see what they do.
 
S&W just sent me a shipping label for me to send it back to the mothership again. We'll see what they do.


Well I am not feeling all Warm and Fuzzy
My son is the Fire arms connoisseur of the family.
After looking at your post, he has determined that the barrels are flawed to say the least. He is not very happy.
he refused to clean the guns until I get a course of action

So I will be waiting to see what happens on your end
But I may also contact S&W too see what they say.
But Im not holding my breath.
And If this is a Barrel Flaw like we suspect, this will be the LAST S&W I ever own
 

Attachments

  • Barrel.jpg
    Barrel.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 282
  • Shells_Bulge.jpg
    Shells_Bulge.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 290
Last edited:
feel free to steal the photos to make your case with S&W, though it shouldn't be hard if you email them a pic of your bulged brass... I'm really hoping they just replace the barrel & everything's hunky-dory after that.
 
feel free to steal the photos to make your case with S&W, though it shouldn't be hard if you email them a pic of your bulged brass... I'm really hoping they just replace the barrel & everything's hunky-dory after that.

That would be nice
Im doing more research, seems like the squeaky wheel gets the grease.
But I must admit, if this is S&W new quality procedure. I am not impressed. For every 10 that look there are probably 100 that dont. never seeing or caring about the bulge in the brass
The whole thing is really starting to PISS me off.!!!!!!!
 
Well my son and I took the guns to the range today
we shot 100 rounds of freedom munitions 115 grain fmj. reloads
both guns ran flawlessly and no bulged brass
no FTE or FTF
I will try some 124 grain from gander mountain next weekend and see what happens ,but it may be the ammo I had that was causing the bulged brass
 
I've had my shield 9mm since last April. I've shot about 500 rounds thru it without any problems. My feed ramp looks like OakleyFreak's & Astocks2622's. Should I be concerned with the feed ramp on my barrel??
 
Oakley: that's interesting that the freedom munitions didn't bulge. their 124 gr xtp load was what seemed to have the most consistent issue with bulging in mine. the bulging brass is the ONLY issue I've had with my 9mm Shield in 400 rds.

Greatlakes: have you shot anything on the hot side? if your feed ramp looks like mine, & you aren't bulging brass, I don't know why mine is... I guess if you're not having obvious problems with brass that looks like a pregnant guppy, you should be fine, though it throws my theory for a loop.
 
I've only shot 2 different kinds of ammo, wwb 115gr and speer gold dot 124gr +p. I've had no weird bulges on the casings


I'm fairly new to shooting, sorry I'm not much help. I would be curious to know what s&w says about the feed ramp. My m&p 9mm fs looks thicker like Rastoff's feed ramp though. I really don't see much discussions on feed ramps. So, maybe you might be onto something. Maybe I haven't shot enough or paid attention enough to the casings I eject. I won't hit a range until the weather warms up.
 
Last edited:
yeah, rastoff's is the "good one" so if yours looks like his & doesn't bulge with the 124 gr +p gold dots, you should be good to go. I think they had some quality control issues & cut the feed ramp too deeply on mine & Oakley's.
 
What i meant was my shield 9 looks just like your feed ramp. My fs 9 has a thicker feed ramp. Clearly something is going with the machining. I'm wondering if the differences in feed ramps may lead to issues-fte,ftf,kabooms, bulges to casings. Does s&w have a guide as to what the feed ramp is supposed to be spec'd to? Both shield and full size operate with either the ammo I use in them.
 
Last edited:
Well we had the benefit of seeing the issue in 2 brand new 9mm's
I am still leaning towards the ammo for now. it was Norinco China Sports ,China made, it has good ratings and is non corrosive.
So Im still not sure what is gong on.
I need to get some hotter rounds thru them for me to be certain

But the 115 reloads shot like a dream, good grouping as well

here is our feed ramp
 

Attachments

  • Barrel.jpg
    Barrel.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 1,326
Smith has long stated that shooting reloaded ammunition in their firearms can void the warranty.

If new cases are unreloadable after firing, then there will be no reloads.;)

Just joking of course. I hope Smith steps up to the plate and correctly repairs any pistol with such a clear defect.
 
Wondering if the spring is maybe just a little to stiff and is just slowing the slide enough to be causing the bulge. Waiting for the Fedex label to come to send my 9mm back for the bulging issue. When I contacted Smith and Wesson they wanted pictures, when I sent the pictures in they called within 5 minutes and I mean 5 minutes of the email sent and said " Do Not fire this firearm. We will send you a shipping label to send it back we want to see this firearm". So we will see what happens.
 
interesting. I volunteered pics because they didn't seem to be taking it seriously... 3-4 days later I got a response asking for shipping info, & a few days later I got a shipping label... I wonder if it's just coming to light.
 
Well we had the benefit of seeing the issue in 2 brand new 9mm's
I am still leaning towards the ammo for now. it was Norinco China Sports ,China made, it has good ratings and is non corrosive.
So Im still not sure what is gong on.
I need to get some hotter rounds thru them for me to be certain



But the 115 reloads shot like a dream, good grouping as well

here is our feed ramp

Norinco 9mm is the only ammo I have had problems with reloading and it had the exact problem you encountered, severe bulging. It was so bad that the resizing die shaved a ring of brass.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top