- Joined
- Jul 9, 2011
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
I cannot fathom why S&W has not made a M&P pistol in a Glock 19 size..I would think it would sell..any other words or wisdom on this from you Smith experts?
...I prefer Smith's version of small, medium & large better than Glock's version of small, medium and large.
What would the purpose of that be? I'd pass on buying one, I prefer Smith's version of small, medium & large better than Glock's version of small, medium and large.
Help me out. What are Smith's small, medium and large? I thought M&Ps came in two sizes? Are you considering the Shield their small size offering?
Not to be too picky about this, but Glock actually has small, medium, large and extra large.
In 9mm: Glock 17, 19, 26 and 34.
In .40: Glock 22, 23, 27 and 35.
That consideration probably stems from the engraving on the side of the slide reads M&P (insert caliber) Shield
I cannot fathom why S&W has not made a M&P pistol in a Glock 19 size..I would think it would sell..any other words or wisdom on this from you Smith experts?
The G19 is a perfect ccw size and that's why I bought an M&P 45c. It's larger than the 9 and 40 c's and very close to a G19 in size.
The 9/40 slide will not work on the compact frame. The dust cover/rail is too short. The concept is sound. The 45/45c slides will interchangeThe full sized M&P 9mm/.40S&W is very close to the G19/23. The full size M&P is .5" taller than the G19. All other dimensions are so close as to be insignificant.
Is there a specific reason you want that exact size?
Another question that I have is, will a full size M&P slide fit on the compact frame? That would be a great carry gun for me.
It's a little like comparing apples to apple sauce.
It's only natural to compare the M&P to the Glock. They are both black, polymer frame, striker fired, steel slide and same type of safeties. However, they are very different guns.
While they both use a trigger with a built in safety and a trigger bar, that's where the trigger mechanism similarity ends. Even though they both have polymer frames, they are wildly different. The M&P was designed from the ground up with ergonomics in mind. The Glock obviously was not.
So, even if there was an M&P with exactly the dimensions of a Glock, it would be a completely different gun and they still wouldn't compare well. The dimensional differences are so small, one is not more concealable than the other.
While I believe I understand the reasoning behind the OP, it's really a moot point.