M638

Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
6,246
Reaction score
12,322
Location
E. Washington State
Any one that has one, what do you think of it?
Recoil bad? Tough to hold on to?
Seems to have small grips I'm thinking.
LGS has one for $421 OTD.
Said I wouldn't buy another alloy frame revolver but
it seemed OK dry firing in the store.
Told there not big sellers for him and only has the one
I looked at.
 
Register to hide this ad
I love mine it is my EDC , very accurate, recoil is ok, i don't mind recoil I will tell you it is a lot less than my 649 357. i paid $425 for mine last year.
comfortable to carry can't say enough about it
 
I'm a real Humpback fan. The enclosed photos show my EDC (right) Model 638-1 and Model 38-0. Both are equipped with Crimson Trace LG-405 laser grips - which I find concealable (they'll fit into your pants pockets without showing), and comfortable - they have a raised area over the back strap of the grip frame, and this area compresses under recoil. I like to use the LG-405 grips on my Airweight J-frames, and I use the LG-105 on my all (stainless) steel J-frames (bottom, left) like my Model 649-0. Assuming it's in good condition, that's not a bad price for the 638 you are considering. I don't have my records at hand, but I think I paid around $350.00 for each of my Bodyguards. I shoot and carry standard velocity 130 gr. Gold Dots loaded for short barreled revolvers.

Best of luck,

Dave
 

Attachments

  • EDC%202_zps6itrqxsu.jpg
    EDC%202_zps6itrqxsu.jpg
    136.4 KB · Views: 95
  • J-frame Bodyguard #1.jpg
    J-frame Bodyguard #1.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 102
The alloy frame is nice if you carry it all day - every day but you will feel a little more recoil than the steel frame.
If you like the idea of being able to fire it single action, the older "Bodyguard" design is the way to go. I personally like the Centennial series but that is just my own bias.
I'm sure you will be happy with it.
 
The humpbacks are my favorite too. My EDC is a M38 flat latch in rotation w/a nickel 442. I used the single action option once to dispatch a deer I hit w/my car many years ago.
 
My M638-2 Airweight with Crimson Trace LG-105 grips like D-O-D's. CBD s/n, made in June of 1996. J-Magnum frame. NOT marked +P, but IMO it could shoot +P till the cows came home and and not hurt it none.

You don't see the -2 come up for sale all too often. I don't, anyway, and I sorta pay attention on GB. I don't think they made them in huge numbers, especially compared to other J-frames like the M642 that were cranked out like hot cakes. Got it from a nice gent up in Washington State who was selling off portions of his father's estate. NIB. Including the grip, got about $650 tied up in it.

This is not a gun that came into my possession by happenstance (like most of my guns). This is one I specifically sought out, after long consideration, from the whole universe of S&W revolvers, and bought to be my EDC. A task to which it is perfectly suited.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • S&W M638-2 left & holster x.JPG
    S&W M638-2 left & holster x.JPG
    271.1 KB · Views: 401
I'm a confirmed "J-hound," yet I only have one 638. Seems the 637 and 642, with all their variants, PC and otherwise, are more numerous. Perhaps there is an unwritten prejudice against the Bodyguard, given the perception that the built-up shroud renders it ugly. Too, the old saw about the possibility of a dime being trapped behind the shrouded hammer does not help. (Not gonna happen to me, there are no dimes in Vegas :D).

That being said, the 638 is my go-to gun when I'm headed to a casino. Just my respect, love and admiration for the model. I stick with the 158gr LHP rounds out of habit, and it's not a bad habit.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

P.S. The shroud/dime fear is unfounded.
 
I've had the 642, 442 and 637 and got rid of them. I love my 638, it's my edc. I practice with it at least twice a month, putting 100 rounds of 130gr ammo through it each time. With the lower grain the recoil isn't bad and I can be very accurate at 8-10 yards.

I put some pretty wood grips on it, but could feel too much snap so I went back to the factory grips.
 
Congrats on your 638.

I too am a advocate of the humpback. It is not a range gun.

Practice enough on a regular basis to keep yourself "Tuned Up" with it. It will do the job. The Airweights are a handful with heavy loads.

A good friend of mine owes his life to a Model 38 some 25 years ago. Each of us carried Bodyguards as our back up guns.

While responding to a domestic call one evening he was attacked by two brothers, losing his service weapon in the fight.

Let me add that he was overpowered by these guys and spent weeks recovering from injuries they inflicted on him. But the fight went to the ground and he was able to get to his back up.

Which he promptly shoved into the armpit of one of his assailants and pulled the trigger 5 times. The other one fled and was captured within minutes.

5 125gr +P JHPs ended that fight for good.

No exposed hammer to hang up in clothing is a big plus.

I speak from years of carrying one, the bull about dimes, lint, is a load of .....if you dump a handful of change in on top of your gun, your a idiot.

You made a good choice.
 
Last edited:
Great snag! I'm also a big humpback fan. I have a 638-2 and a 638-3. The -2 being a little more "rare" and in mint condition, it's relegated to safe duty. My 638-3 was purchased new and has a CT-405 grip and mostly carried in a cheapie Uncle Mikes IWB holster.

I also have a 649 and a 649-1. Love those humpbacks!

Regards
 
Last edited:
The grips on this one OK, or are there better ones around that don't beat you up bad?

The issue of grips is VERY subjective. Some prefer wood. Others like the rubber styles. Some go for grips which are flush with the butt of the gun while others dig a longer grip which brings the pinky finger into play.

The issue grips on your gun are the S&W knock-offs of the UM Boot Grip which, IMO, provide a firm grip and fill in the space behind the trigger guard so the gun does not 'dive' into the hand upon firing. I like them or the original UMs for all modes of carry with these small .38s, although some shooters find the rubber adheres to clothing, causing difficulty in drawing the weapon.

I use these grips daily, although I have accumulated over 20 different style of RB-J grips over the years. You may also! Enjoy that great little gun.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

P.S. Remember to remove the grips after firing to clean the frame underneath.
 
I thought I wanted a 638 a few years ago. When I fondled one at the LGS, I found I couldn't cock it single action. So I bought my 642.
 
The issue of grips is VERY subjective. Some prefer wood. Others like the rubber styles. Some go for grips which are flush with the butt of the gun while others dig a longer grip which brings the pinky finger into play.

The issue grips on your gun are the S&W knock-offs of the UM Boot Grip which, IMO, provide a firm grip and fill in the space behind the trigger guard so the gun does not 'dive' into the hand upon firing. I like them or the original UMs for all modes of carry with these small .38s, although some shooters find the rubber adheres to clothing, causing difficulty in drawing the weapon.

I use these grips daily, although I have accumulated over 20 different style of RB-J grips over the years. You may also! Enjoy that great little gun.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

P.S. Remember to remove the grips after firing to clean the frame underneath.

Agree completely. The Uncle Mikes Boot Grip is my favorite for J frames; however I do like a laser sight on a carry gun and the Crimson Trace LG-105 has almost exactly the same contours as the Uncle Mikes. That is how I've equipped my EDC 340SC.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2065.jpg
    IMG_2065.jpg
    119.1 KB · Views: 30
Congrats on your newest! :)

I prefer the UM's boot grips or the Magna style wood grips with a grip adapter for pocket carry. Pachmayr Compac's are nice as well and can be pocket carried but work better for belt carry.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top