Melonite, is it really better than chrome lined?

Did anybody watch the video I posted just a couple of days ago where this was discussed by a rep from a company that uses BOTH processes?
http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-wesson-m-p15-rifles/514977-nitride-chrome-q-faxon-rep.html

Watched it and appreciated the post,may indeed use one of their barrels because of it. I was familiar with the processes but you can always learn more. I am especially interested in the skinny barrels they produce as I never experienced any problems with A1 barrels but the heavier bullets used today increase the useable range and need a faster twist rate. Thanks for your post.
 
Watched it and appreciated the post,may indeed use one of their barrels because of it. I was familiar with the processes but you can always learn more. I am especially interested in the skinny barrels they produce as I never experienced any problems with A1 barrels but the heavier bullets used today increase the useable range and need a faster twist rate. Thanks for your post.
Yes, indeed! :) There are always new applications and refinements coming out. From what I had seen, the two processes were pretty much interchangeable, but the video showed how, for certain purposes, one seems to be better than the other.
 
It's gotta be better than the Ruger process of just anodizing the barrel on their budget ARs. The key word here is "budget". S&W does use chrome in other locations.

I'm hoping to pick up my first Sport II at a gun show next weekend so I wish you guys would stop talking it down. :)
 
It's gotta be better than the Ruger process of just anodizing the barrel on their budget ARs. The key word here is "budget". S&W does use chrome in other locations.

I'm hoping to pick up my first Sport II at a gun show next weekend so I wish you guys would stop talking it down. :)
I'm completely pleased with mine. :)
 
Back
Top