I'm not going to try to tell you what to get, I just wanted to say I'm pretty fond of my "Classic" Model 19-9. That's a fine shooting gun.
Model 27 or Model 19 ?
- Thread starter huntolive
- Start date
If you want to shoot a .357 a lot I wouldn't get a model 19. I have several and don't think of them as a good platform for a .357. They're improved K frames and not much more. They make excellent revolvers for 38 spl or reduced .357 loads (38 spl plus P) however. Nothing wrong with that. The loads in my Hornady manual show 800-1100 fps depending on the bullet weight.
My idea of a proper .357 is something like an L or N frame.
Having said that my old model 19's are beauties and accurate like a laser. I've had them a long time and still my favorite S&W revolvers. I have others.
My idea of a proper .357 is something like an L or N frame.
Having said that my old model 19's are beauties and accurate like a laser. I've had them a long time and still my favorite S&W revolvers. I have others.
Last edited:
michael1000
US Veteran
I am a K frame guy. shoot 357 some, but not all the time. 4 inch barrels are a good, all around size. if you want a healthier chassis, use an N frame. blue, stainless or nickle is a personal choice. just shoot the thing and have fun (that's what it's all about).
TheHobbyist
Member
@OP, Sorry I have been swamped with work unfortunately and just had a chance to review.
The Model 28 is an excellent choice. I currently have one NIB 5-screw and a shooter. One of my favorites.
Opinions vary for a number of reasons but there is nothing 'wrong' with a modern 'Classic' line option and my opinion would be to buy with confidence. This hobby is an education and I'd encourage you to visit a large distributor in your area for the new or 'Classic' lines and check the ergonomics for yourself. Even better if you have a friend who may be able to help locally and the two of you can go to the range together.
The Model 28 is an excellent choice. I currently have one NIB 5-screw and a shooter. One of my favorites.
Opinions vary for a number of reasons but there is nothing 'wrong' with a modern 'Classic' line option and my opinion would be to buy with confidence. This hobby is an education and I'd encourage you to visit a large distributor in your area for the new or 'Classic' lines and check the ergonomics for yourself. Even better if you have a friend who may be able to help locally and the two of you can go to the range together.
S&W-Keeper
Member
Hard to pick. I have 6 of both.It is like picking your favorite grandchild.
DeplorabusUnum
Member
Both is better
I have a 27-2 5" and a model 19-4 6". I love them both. If you're going to shoot mainly 38 Sp loads the model 19 is a very nice revolver. I enjoy shooting that revolver more than my model 66 with 2 3/4" barrel. If you have smaller hands like I do, the K frames stocks are an easier fit.
However, if you want to shoot lots of .357, the model 27 is the way to go, IMO. It's more pleasant to shoot magnum loads with. Mine has some modified stocks on it that are smaller than typical N frame stocks. For me that makes a huge difference. If I could only have one, it would be the model 27, hands down. I also like the balance of the 5" barrel. It just feels right. But like the title says, "both is better".
I have a 27-2 5" and a model 19-4 6". I love them both. If you're going to shoot mainly 38 Sp loads the model 19 is a very nice revolver. I enjoy shooting that revolver more than my model 66 with 2 3/4" barrel. If you have smaller hands like I do, the K frames stocks are an easier fit.
However, if you want to shoot lots of .357, the model 27 is the way to go, IMO. It's more pleasant to shoot magnum loads with. Mine has some modified stocks on it that are smaller than typical N frame stocks. For me that makes a huge difference. If I could only have one, it would be the model 27, hands down. I also like the balance of the 5" barrel. It just feels right. But like the title says, "both is better".
Similar threads
