Model 41 - Buy new or risk old?

A gunsmith at Clark Guns, who may be their "M41" gunsmith, told me, "new M41's are better made, and made of better materials than old, though not necessarily more accurate or more reliable"

He had worked on over 200 M41's and got some running that the S&W Customer shop had worked on, shipped out, and failed.

This is a 1968 vintage M46. Smith and Wesson would not drill and tap it for an optical sight, because they don't have the parts to fix the thing if they broke it.

HTsKjB7.jpeg


CVBKIry.jpeg


r6qrx7C.jpeg


Smith and Wesson did drill and tap this 1988 M41. This is something to consider, you will want to shoot optics at some point and older M41's are not drilled and tapped. You can expect to spend $100 to $200 on shipping, drilling, etc. Factor that in.

xAXDbQb.jpeg


Notice the slide rib thickness difference. That may be one reason S&W would not work on the M46.

A shooting bud, brought out his Dad's first year production M41 and shot it in a club match. Don't know how much Dad shot the thing, but it had been used. As long as the M41 appears to be little used, I doubt very much that it will have any problems. The head of the All Guard military team said the common problems he had seen were extractor spring problems, he had seen a number of where the firing pin block (6508)

ZSqdl8j.jpeg


had worked loose. When the block is loose, wiggles lets say, the round will fall off the breech face. He peened the block ribs till it fit tight again.

My own experience, even with the 1988 M41, change the recoil spring and the mainspring. All sorts of malfunctions due to weak ignition and a weak recoil spring. Both are easy to replace. Buy OEM mainsprings. I also make it a practice to blow out the firing pin block with compressed air. I press the firing pin forward, with a chop stick for example, and blow air at the tip. Always find oil coming out. You don't want the firing pin floating in oil, takes away from ignition energy.

I think the All Guard team leader had 60,000 rounds through his M41. He had log book, recommended I keep one. There are shooters who have been using their M41 for decades and have shot cases of ammunition. An interesting experience from the Clark gunsmith, he had a M41 slide that had been used so much "it was bent like a bananna" That may have been one of the older M41's.

It is my recollection Clark guarantee's their M41's to shoot under an inch at 50 yards. Clark installs a Walther barrel and then has a range tunnel.

qoc5GIf.jpeg


TvOOW8m.jpeg


I think the average M41 shot ten shot groups from 5/8" to 3/4" at fifty yards. Accuracy was highly ammunition dependent, with the gunsmith commenting on how much better "fresh" match ammunition shot. And he had seen some awful groups from a "tipped box". He said the best group ever was a ten shot 3/8" group at 50 yards. That was probably a statistical aberration, if you ever have your 22lr match tested, match ammunition varies a lot.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the info everyone.

I shot on a bullseye league for a number of years using a pre-17 and a 14.

I’ve got steel gongs of varying sizes at various distances in the back yard that I like to put a few hundred rounds a week on.

I’m mainly interested in something that I can shoot quite a bit informally, while appreciating the build quality. I’ve got lots of Elly 10X on hand.
 
I lusted after a Model 41 for many years but always seemed to find something else on which I wanted more to spend that much money. Two years ago, thinking that maybe their well-publicized problems had been corrected, I decided to order a PC Victory with the optic sight. As an outdoor writer, I am able to buy direct from manufacturers with shipping to an FFL holder.

I was advised that there was no production schedule for that model and an estimate of four months was offered so I asked about a non-PC Model 41 with the 7-1/2" barrel. That too was not in production at that time but the delivery estimate was much more attractive so I ordered one.

I shot nothing in it but CCI Standard Velocity but experienced failures of the slide to return to battery after every shot. Speaks highly about factory test-firing, huh? At S&W's request, I sent it back and it was returned in about a month, which isn't hateful, but they indicated that it functioned properly for them and advised me that it was test-fired with CCI SV.

Naturally, the condition remained so I took it my local gunsmith, who professed to have little experience with Model 41s, but he thought the slide required excessive effort to be cycled so he laid a small straight-edge along its rails and found high spots. After working it back and forth by hand for a few minutes, he took it outside and ran a magazine of target ammo through it without a hitch.

The gun certainly seems accurate but at age 78, seeing iron sights is challenging so I have affixed an optical sight to it but I haven't shot it yet. The groups I shot at 25 yards were very promising so I'm holding high expectations for it.

It's nicely finished and with a set of vintage Model 41 stocks installed in place of the laminated ones they now use, it looks and feels nice. But I guess we have to expect lower quality control from manufacturers these days - both in the production and repair areas.

Craftsmen are becoming scarce in all fields. Last week, we found clear water on one of our bathroom floors. Arthritis prevents me from crawling around to look under the toilet tank to determine the cause so I called a major plumbing company that had done some nice work for us in the past. The young plumber who came immediately said the wax ring was the source of the leak which puzzled me because only waste water passes through those things so the water shouldn't be crystal clear. Plus they had replaced that part 18 months prior. "You never know with these things," I was told so I approved $574 for the repair including $89 for the pleasure of him showing up.

When the ring was replaced he came to my office and advised me that the toilet was leaking through a crack in the tank and gave me a quote on a new toilet. Cars and guns I have knowledge of but not toilets however I was becoming suspicious so I thanked him for his time and stopped payment on the check soon afterward.

My wife has some physical challenges so I shopped for a new toilet with a higher seat. The new toilet is $299 and I found a local plumber my same age who is going to change them out for $100. He even said he found it hard to believe they used a wax ring when foam ones that are much better have been available for several years. $574 to replace a wax ring (that wasn't even leaking) or $399 for a new toilet, installed. Hmm...

Ed
 
I have an old one, '79 7 inch, that I got for under 1k several years ago. Great condition, but wouldn't fire consistently. Tried everything. Ended up sending it to David Sams in VA, who religned it, refaced the breech, tuned my 5, metal-follower magazines, and worked his all-around magic. Shoots beautifully now with nary a hick-up. It did cost some $, though.


A year earlier, I bought a 5-inch 41 new. FtF problems, and the trigger guard would get stuck in the open position. It took three or four trips to S&W (on their dime) to rectify all problems. Now it shoots as well as the 79.



How well? In a rest they'll group 3/4 inch at fifty yards. Then there's the fact that, for me at least, there's simply no handgun that's more pleasurable to shoot. Not to mention the aesthetic beauty of the 41. On that score, I'm a little partial to the 7 inch barrel and the deep bluing of the older guns.
 
Last edited:
Old 41's

I like the old ones ( have 25 under serial # 20,000 ) . I would not give a nickel for a new one . All I hear about the new one's is problems . I shot an old one so much ( 100 k ) that the bolt face got battered . It went too far forward which made the extractor move out enough to cause some failure to extract which is a problem in a match .simple fix was replacing the bolt . No more problems . It was an old 41 and this happened 35 years ago . The old ones were hand fit by real gunsmith. New ones are assembled !
 
Last edited:
I don't know much. I had only one, 90xxx. Had five or six mags? Two barrels. No problems.

Did have a used 46 in the early eighties. Also no problems, except the trigger may have been just barely too light for bullseye matches.
 
New here but a long time M41 owner. Back in the 70's we all used M41's and shot them with whatever ammo was cheapest, meaning most all of it was high velocity. Eventually my first one hammered the breach face pretty bad after about 25,000 rounds. It still worked fine though. I traded it in for a new one (7"), and I still have it. A friend of mine bought a custom shop M41 two years ago and he has had to send it back twice now. We were dirt bikers back in the day and spent a lot of time out in the Nevada desert. A stop to rest always ended with a shooting competition. About five of the guys used Ruger bull barrel .22's, and I used a revolver. One day in the mid 70's I bought a M41 and no matter how they tried I would always beat them. Not by much, but I would beat them. One by one they ended up with M41's :), and thus the competition got much more interesting. No one ever had any reliability or accuracy issues with theirs. I have never changed a recoil spring. These day I shoot CCI std. velocity only in all my .22's. I would never buy a new M41. The older ones are best. Be sure to check the breach face for wear. It will be very obvious.
 
All I can do is give you my own personal experience. In my lifetime I have owned about 5 different model 41 pistols. The first one I bought new back probably in 1983. Most of my life I have been a trader and never kept any very long. All the rest I have owned were used but in very good condition. The last one I owned was made in 2007, so it had a more matte finish and laminated grips. Some shooters experience function problems with these pistols but I never did with any of them. I only had one problem with one of the used ones, and that was the extractor spring had become corroded or lodged and didn't put any pressure on the extractor, and once I got that corrected I was good to go. They all basically ran like the proverbial Timex watch. Personally if I were in the market again, I would just look for one in very nice condition, newer or older, and roll the dice. The last 2 I owned were bought under very good circumstances. The seller was a pawn shop owner who I knew and he told me if they didn't function well just bring them back. It's hard to beat a deal like that.
 
Thanks again for all the info. I’m still on the hunt for one, and am trying to decide on which barrel length I’d prefer without getting to handle one in person.

Interestingly enough, when I run across past auction that have multiple barrels included, it seems the 5.5 is always the one mounted on the pistol.

Is there that big of a 5.5 barrel preference for shooting, or is this a fluke?
 
I am of the opinion that if S&W would make a run of say, 5000 5 inch field/ sport barrels, they would sell out immediately.

I’ll bet I’ve put 3X as many rounds thru my 5 inch as what I have my 7 and 5.5 put together.
 
I am of the opinion that if S&W would make a run of say, 5000 5 inch field/ sport barrels, they would sell out immediately.

I’ll bet I’ve put 3X as many rounds thru my 5 inch as what I have my 7 and 5.5 put together.

Especially if the barrels were designed to readily accept red dot sights and were threaded on the end for suppressor use.
 
Yep, same old arguments for old vs. new. I'll bet most of you that propose old is better are still driving Edsel's, have a top hat refrigerator in the kitchen and a "reel" mower in the garage. You hear more bad about the new M41's due to the electronic wizardry you are using right now. Suffice to say if we would have had modern communications back in the day there would have been many more bad reports issued on what now are considered vintage M41's. It's much easier today to complain about a product at the speed of light on a forum that contains hundreds or thousands of members, than to sit down and actually write a letter that only goes to one person like we did 50 years ago. Today one complaint on a forum is read by hundreds in a short time and the seed is planted. Hang around in gun stores or ranges long enough and inevitably you will hear the phrase, "I read about....." this or that, good or bad.

I used to listen to all the baloney from people that read about something and now I just turn them off. If it didn't happen to them personally I don't want to hear it. I have a shelf full of cleaners that I read about and were supposed to be really good at removing copper from a barrel. Now I have a bunch of ineffective copper cleaners on a shelf. So much for reading about something. I have come to realize in my old age that everything I read and sometimes hear about must be taken with a grain of salt. It's far too easy today to post a complaint on a forum and have it go viral. Let me ask this and then I will shut up, if the new Model 41 or 41 PC were as bad as what many here say it is, do you think Smith and Wesson would continue to manufacture them? Doesn't it stand to reason if the Model 41 had so many problems over the last few years the factory would discontinue it and move production to something else? Somehow I doubt the current Model 41 is a big seller for the Mothership at close to $1,500.00 and it must have a horribly long warranty repair line. Egads, I read on the Smith and Wesson forum that new Model 41's are junk so it must be true! So where is the real truth? Will a firearm made 30, 40 or 50 years ago get the same treatment as one made today? I doubt it, besides the bugs have been worked out of the surviving old ones.

Rick H.
 
While I would ideally have multiple barrels, unfortunately, that’s not an option for me at the moment. I have no doubts that the field barrel is also excellent, but I’m unlikely to find a gun with one installed.

Is there a general consensus on which of the commonly available barrels is the best? I’m trying to decide between the 5.5 and the 7/7 3/8, and I’m curious because all the listings I see that include two barrels always seem to have the 5.5 installed.

I’d also be curious to hear what everyone thinks of the pistols with extendable front sights.
 
Last edited:
Here's some condensed advice, not on barrels (which I don't have any insights on), but on purchasing old vs. new. If I were on a budget, I would only buy a used pistol if I could take it to a range and put 50-100 rounds through it. Or, if there were some guarantee attached to it, which is fairly uncommon in my experience. The risk is that you'll pay upwards of 1k for on older pistol and then have to spend another 400-700 to get it in tip top shape. If buying new, I'd prefer to look at it in a shop, and remove and reinstall the barrel several times to make sure that the trigger guard doesn't get stuck, which can be a problem with the new 41s. If you're buying new online, I'd insist on breaking the gun down at your FFL before taking possession of it. After that, any problems you encounter will be taken care of by S&W on their dime. It may take several tries, unfortunately, but in my experience the pistol that they repair will be worth it. Again, this is just my experience, from having both a new and relatively old (1979) 41. A very small sample size, to be sure.
 
I lusted after a Model 41 for many years but always seemed to find something else on which I wanted more to spend that much money. Two years ago, thinking that maybe their well-publicized problems had been corrected, I decided to order a PC Victory with the optic sight. As an outdoor writer, I am able to buy direct from manufacturers with shipping to an FFL holder.

I was advised that there was no production schedule for that model and an estimate of four months was offered so I asked about a non-PC Model 41 with the 7-1/2" barrel. That too was not in production at that time but the delivery estimate was much more attractive so I ordered one.

I shot nothing in it but CCI Standard Velocity but experienced failures of the slide to return to battery after every shot. Speaks highly about factory test-firing, huh? At S&W's request, I sent it back and it was returned in about a month, which isn't hateful, but they indicated that it functioned properly for them and advised me that it was test-fired with CCI SV.

Naturally, the condition remained so I took it my local gunsmith, who professed to have little experience with Model 41s, but he thought the slide required excessive effort to be cycled so he laid a small straight-edge along its rails and found high spots. After working it back and forth by hand for a few minutes, he took it outside and ran a magazine of target ammo through it without a hitch.

The gun certainly seems accurate but at age 78, seeing iron sights is challenging so I have affixed an optical sight to it but I haven't shot it yet. The groups I shot at 25 yards were very promising so I'm holding high expectations for it.

It's nicely finished and with a set of vintage Model 41 stocks installed in place of the laminated ones they now use, it looks and feels nice. But I guess we have to expect lower quality control from manufacturers these days - both in the production and repair areas.

Craftsmen are becoming scarce in all fields. Last week, we found clear water on one of our bathroom floors. Arthritis prevents me from crawling around to look under the toilet tank to determine the cause so I called a major plumbing company that had done some nice work for us in the past. The young plumber who came immediately said the wax ring was the source of the leak which puzzled me because only waste water passes through those things so the water shouldn't be crystal clear. Plus they had replaced that part 18 months prior. "You never know with these things," I was told so I approved $574 for the repair including $89 for the pleasure of him showing up.

When the ring was replaced he came to my office and advised me that the toilet was leaking through a crack in the tank and gave me a quote on a new toilet. Cars and guns I have knowledge of but not toilets however I was becoming suspicious so I thanked him for his time and stopped payment on the check soon afterward.

My wife has some physical challenges so I shopped for a new toilet with a higher seat. The new toilet is $299 and I found a local plumber my same age who is going to change them out for $100. He even said he found it hard to believe they used a wax ring when foam ones that are much better have been available for several years. $574 to replace a wax ring (that wasn't even leaking) or $399 for a new toilet, installed. Hmm...

Ed

Good story, what I want to know, is how did this shake out with the original company that you cancelled the check on?
 
Rick H., what you wrote should be read by every keyboard jockey in America! I have said the same thing numerous times. I spent 38 years in automotive service management and learned from numerous training courses and real-world experience that the typical American will tell 10 people about a negative service experience but only one person about a positive one. I'm sure everyone reading this can confirm that from social gatherings they have attended. People love to complain.

And Narragansett, they called to ask for a shot at recifying the experience but when I told them how it had been rectified, they thanked me for my time said they would speak with their employee about it.

The older plumber who did the work did have to charge me more than his original quote because he had to correct something the plumbing company's other employee did incorrectly 18 months before - soldered a three-inch toilet flange onto a four-inch drain using a sleeve. I guess that if done correctly, that would work but he had the flange too high for the new toilet not to rock very slightly.

Ed
 
I don't know, but I have been fiddling around with the idea of a 41 forever. Many of the older ones for sale are within close dollars of a new one.

I think I am going to save some dollars, and getting a Ruger MK4, and throwing a Volquartson trigger in it along with the accu package, and go to the range. I am sure it will shoot better than me, and I believe there will not be much difference in accuracy. They are not as finicky ammo wise
 
Back
Top