smithscott
Member
To answer some points, the below.
1) I have broken a few parts on S&W 3rd Generation guns, including an extractor hook. While that is a fifteen minute job with a Glock 19 (changed more than a few), it is a trip to the factory or a real armorer for the 3rd Generation. I do agree with the backup philosophy, and I have duplicates of any pistol I carry. I rather do the work myself, but an extractor change on the S&W is much more involved.
2) There are fewer holster choices for the S&W guns due to the waning demand for them, especially new holster designs. Want a Sparks Nexus with the magnetic loop closures for the 3rd Generation? No can do, but there is an offering for the Glocks. An example of just fewer options due to many shooters going for something else.
3) I agree about the weight not being an issue with a good holster and belt, but as we age, a little less weight on the belt is a good thing for the back.
6) I really like the HD sights on a carry gun, but I can and do make do with the Novak. It is just nice to have choices. With the S&W guns, there are fewer of them. The slide design lends itself to choices due to the dovetail design, but fewer companies offer sights for the guns.
7) You may be right as the 5906 magazines will work in a 6906.
Much of the above is all about the market and popularity. Glock pistols, in a word, are popular. As a result, there are lots of choices for aftermarket parts and support for the guns. One can walk into most any gun store and find Glock pistols, magazines, sights, and holsters. Not so true for the S&W 3rd Gen guns. It does not make them bad pistols, but logistics are a big part of choosing a carry gun, and S&W does not want to sell more 3rd Generation pistols.
If one has all they need, the 3rd Generation guns are viable carry pistols. One may give up some options as the ability to easily mount a light or the ability to get a SIRT, but the guns will do the job. If one is starting from scratch, the 3rd Generation guns have been superseded in the marketplace.
1) I have broken a few parts on S&W 3rd Generation guns, including an extractor hook. While that is a fifteen minute job with a Glock 19 (changed more than a few), it is a trip to the factory or a real armorer for the 3rd Generation. I do agree with the backup philosophy, and I have duplicates of any pistol I carry. I rather do the work myself, but an extractor change on the S&W is much more involved.
2) There are fewer holster choices for the S&W guns due to the waning demand for them, especially new holster designs. Want a Sparks Nexus with the magnetic loop closures for the 3rd Generation? No can do, but there is an offering for the Glocks. An example of just fewer options due to many shooters going for something else.
3) I agree about the weight not being an issue with a good holster and belt, but as we age, a little less weight on the belt is a good thing for the back.
6) I really like the HD sights on a carry gun, but I can and do make do with the Novak. It is just nice to have choices. With the S&W guns, there are fewer of them. The slide design lends itself to choices due to the dovetail design, but fewer companies offer sights for the guns.
7) You may be right as the 5906 magazines will work in a 6906.
Much of the above is all about the market and popularity. Glock pistols, in a word, are popular. As a result, there are lots of choices for aftermarket parts and support for the guns. One can walk into most any gun store and find Glock pistols, magazines, sights, and holsters. Not so true for the S&W 3rd Gen guns. It does not make them bad pistols, but logistics are a big part of choosing a carry gun, and S&W does not want to sell more 3rd Generation pistols.
If one has all they need, the 3rd Generation guns are viable carry pistols. One may give up some options as the ability to easily mount a light or the ability to get a SIRT, but the guns will do the job. If one is starting from scratch, the 3rd Generation guns have been superseded in the marketplace.