swampersand
Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2007
- Messages
- 213
- Reaction score
- 20
Perhaps if someone were offered immunity things would get moving.
Not here at least. If he did it was top secret, like everything else. We don't want Putin to know.
Nothing new to report. I've talked to the owner of the mg several times since things stalled and there has been no communication about it.
Maybe someday.
Eddy's Shooting Sports
Could you please clarify this a little for us: "I've talked to the owner of the mg several times since things stalled and there has been no communication about it."
Was the owner ever given any expectation that he would receive information back from the individuals the photos were sent to?
The owner has not followed up or called OR he has but hasn't been given any information?
Owner doesn't know who they are?
They have not responded to his inquiries?
Does he ever anticipate an answer?
Does he care if he ever receives an answer or not?
Is it perhaps that he doesn't want to share results if he did or does receive information?
Thx,
This is an interesting thread imo. One thing that might also be done (with owner's consent, of course) is to accurately measure chamber length & diameter, measure bore diameter & perhaps also slug the bore and measure groove diameter. I think that might verify if the gun was intended for the 41 Colt OR a European revolver round.
FYI and I realize that I am quite late on this thread, but to --- Alk8944 is correct-
U.S. Cartridges and Their Handguns by Charles R Suydam (1977) shows a .41 S&W cartridge on page 192. I am not suggesting that the dies in the original post are for this cartridge but thought I would pass on the details.
Cartridge dimensions:
Rim dia. - .455
Head dia - .406
Case mouth dia. - .406
Bullet dia. - .373
Case length - 1.041
Overall length - 1.470
Quoting the text:
"The .41 S&W is one of a series of experimental cartridges made for S&W by UMC sometime in the period 1890-1910. It is unlike any other .41 calibre cartridge, and no information as to its load, bullet weight, or powder type has been found".
The text goes on for two pages but my typing is so slow I am not going to try.
I am not a big forum guy and do not know how these things work but, is it OK to scan and upload the pages from a book like this or is that a copyright infringement?
Chris
Mr. David,
I will be in your area the last 10 days of March, perhaps I could swing by your shop and download copies of the "high quality" photos, or any other documents you would be willing to share. I will bring a 100 GB remote drive, so storage space should not be a problem. I will see that any photos or documents get to several Highly Experienced and Respected Smith and Wesson experts. I also give you my oath that I will not release any photos or documents to the public at large without your permission.
Added: Sir, I await your reply…
Sorry, I do not have the photos in my possession nor would I be able to provide them to you, as they were taken by a professional photographer and he owns them.
How convenient.
As mentioned in the thread, these pictures were already provided to the highest tier of S&W experts.
I think it might actually be a good idea to lock this thread for now. If there is more information that comes to light, then the moderators could simply revive it if needed.
Sorry, I do not have the photos in my possession nor would I be able to provide them to you, as they were taken by a professional photographer and he owns them.
As mentioned in the thread, these pictures were already provided to the highest tier of S&W experts.
I think it might actually be a good idea to lock this thread for now. If there is more information that comes to light, then the moderators could simply revive it if needed.
Well, with these recent cryptic replies, it has certainly taken on an air of the bizarre. The gun is clearly over one HUNDRED years old, far beyond the reach of political or clandestine import. Despite this, it is becoming ridiculously cloak-and-dagger. I certainly hope that it's story is told someday.
It occurs to me that the pivotal issue may revolve around the possible
value of the firearm.
The factors involved may be contingent on an agreed valuation.
Negotiations may now be in process and the desire of anybody not
directly involved in the deal is not a factor.
Possibly the actual ownership of the firearm may be cloudy, in ways
we have no ability to know.
A plausible example would be a divorce or the possible claims of another party.
Maybe the owner is overwhelmed and indecisive.....or really doesn't care.
We are on planet weird. The more $ at stake.....the weirder it gets.
Too bad we can't gather the villagers and storm the castle with torches,
all in the name of sincere curiosity.
You ever try and buy a decent torch?