I dislke NBC and the media generally, but feel that they are on the right track here.
I wanted very much to watch the show, but had to take a long distance call then and was able to follow only some of the report.
I firmly believe that the trigger system on the Models 721, 722, 725, and 700 is inherently defective, and I would not own one unless the trigger was replaced with a well known substitute. The actual DESIGNER of the trigger system, long retired, confessed that he had warned Remington about a possible flaw that might cause the trigger to fire improperly, and asked that they let him redesign it. They refused, because the marketing dept. didn't want the rifles costing a NICKEL more than before. Literally.
Testimony shows that the trigger system used on Models 870, 1100, M-740 series, M-760, etc. also reportedly has a tolerance issue where the system can fail if any tiny debris gets lodged where it can prevent the parts interfacing properly, or the safety can be dislodged by a sudden bump/jar. This is a moral, if not legal, disgrace!
I own a M-870 and like it, but will not fully trust the safety. I take great care not to have the muzzle cross anyone and do not stand the gun where it can fall.
Remington also used a marraging steel in 870 barrels for years, probably because it was cheaper than good chrome moly steel. This supposedly led to some burst barrels, but I am unsure if those barrels would not have burst anyway, if a stoppage in the barrel was the issue. But better barrel steel would be desirable.
The media is almost surely not telling the whole truth, but neiither, I think, is Remington.
We as gun owners are rightly deeply suspicious of the media, and NBC seems to be taking the anti-gun lead lately. It may be part of a pre-November agenda, which I dare not say more about on this board.
But if a problem is real, they need to bring it to the public's attention, and I applaud this program, at least those parts which may be factual.
It is inescapable that the DESIGNER OF THE 700-SERIES RIFLES said that the trigger is flawed, and that Remington has gone decades without heeding his warning and has encountered some lawsuits in cases where people were injured or killed as a result.
My son has personally experienced a M-700 firing as the safety was released. Thankfully, the rifle was empty and pointed in a safe direction. He is a VERY experienced, careful gun handler.
Many Remington products are in the hands of the general public, many of whom are rather vague about gun handling. Many are casual hunters with limited interest in firearms, and others buy the guns for home defense and do not familiarize themselves with them as much as they should. Because Remington products are cheaper than some and are so widely sold, many are in public hands.
The company has a responsibility to examine the safety issues and correct them, and publish ads and propaganda in the gun magazines that detail what was done to remedy the problem. But that would be admitting that there IS a problem, which would expose them to enormous legal jeopardy ! I don't look for a fix. That should have come about in 1946...for the cost of an added 5 cents per rifle in the case of the M-700 series.
I will probably never buy another Remington firearm. I'm satisfied that NBC and others who have commented over the years have produced enough smoke that there is a fire there. And gun owners should not have a knee-jerk reaction causing us to rush to Remington's defense.
Remington ammunition has also had enough QC problems in recent years that I try to avoid it, too. And I've seen too many complaints about their cheaper Express shotguns to buy one. The Wingmaster seems to use better quality parts in critical areas. Many Remington products perform well for many years, but some do not, when things fail because they can.
I don't want a gun failing to perform its proper functions while in my hands.