Hope it functions properly. No disrespect intended, but I would walked away from that one.
I would have used the peening marks as a reason to dicker the price lower.![]()
That is some serious peening from the firing pin. It may interfere with inserting a cartridge all the way and would require reaming to remove the upset material. I see that the S/N on the cylinder face appears to have been filed off too; it is NOT worn down. If you have not picked it up yet you should remove the grips and make sure the S/N there is intact. If it is removed there I would try to get out of the purchase, These are great revolvers and it's worth fixing up.
That is one very badly abused revolver, and a prime example why .22 rim-fire revolvers absolutely should not be dry-fired! A lot of the dry-fire has been double-action which is why the firing pin strikes on the back of the cylinder show the gun has been subject to "throw-by". This happens when people do fast dry-firing in double-action. You just don't see it in center-fire guns usually because of the larger chambers and the firing pin usually falls within the chamber instead of on the cylinder.
If you hadn't bought this gun yet my advice would be to walk away from it! There are many, many K-22s that haven't been so badly abused!
Identifying S&W .22 revolvers is easy as long as the gun is .22 Long Rifle. There really are basically only two, The K-22 Masterpiece on the medium K-Frame, and the .22-32 on the I-J small frame, or later the J-frame.
Me thinks the bottom line of all this is RUN!!---do not walk away from this.
Ralph Tremaine
I would have used the peening marks as a reason to dicker the price lower.![]()
That's a badly abused gun. I wouldn't own it even if it was free.
That's a badly abused gun. I wouldn't own it even if it was free.
Is it posible the cylinder stop is worn? I had an issue with mine on a HFT a while back that was unusualy worn, a new "used" one corrected the issue of lock up. Can ytou post a picture of yours by chance?