If you prefer a revolver, Charter Arms makes a dandy .40S&W snubby, the "Bulldog", I bought a used one in stainless, but thier Melonite finish is very appealing.
I'm a believer in having 2 identical or very similar carry pistols. That way if one is in the shop or the evidence locker you grab the spare and roll.
I also know people who have 1 pistol that is used strictly for training with an identical second pistol that's used for carry.
I'm probably going to be tarred and feathered for this, but the best, reasonably priced concealable pistol with maximum firepower I have shot in the last year has to be the SCCY CPX-2. 9mm, 10+1 capacity and a DAO trigger. Think of it as a boxy 11 shot revolver.
IMHO, IF YOU ARE THINKING OF THIS WEAPON AS AN 11 SHOT REVOLVER, YOU ARE MERELY FOOLING YOURSELF......
I SINCERELY HOPE THAT YOU NEVER HAVE TO LEARN THE DIFFERENCE THE HARD WAY......
Or you could just get a Glock 19.![]()
Over on Defensivecarry.com, one of the regular posters had a SCCY 9mm barrel blow up in his hand.
If I wanted a subcompact double stack 9mm, I'd personally go with the Keltec P11, which SCCY copied with apparently inferior metallurgy.
I also know people who have 1 pistol that is used strictly for training with an identical second pistol that's used for carry.
Cops have to train and qualify with the pistol they carry. If yours ends up in evidence, even if you're issued the exact same make and model, you still have to qualify with it. Seems like a good idea to me . . .
I'm not sure what you're saying.
Are you saying that having a back up weapon is a good idea or being required to qualify with it is a good idea
As a citizen I'm not going to be issued a replacement weapon and I'm not going to have to qualify with it.
Your post was about having one weapon for training and another identical weapon to carry. My post pointedness out that cops must train and qualify with the weapon they carry, and that seems like a reasonable standard. I was attempting to infer that a citizen who doesn't ever shoot a weapon, but carries it for self-defense, may face some difficult questions . . .
A random private citizen such as myself might have a problem explaining it to the police's satisfaction but it's not illegal.
I think that's what I wrote . . .
A random private citizen such as myself might have a problem explaining it to the police's satisfaction but it's not illegal.
.