New 2.0 Compact vs old Compact

I've always been fond of the M&P line. I considered them "tweeners" due to their size comparison as the fullsize fits between a Glock 17&19. The compacts, between the G19 & 26. Although I've railed in the past about the quality of the stock triggers. I've found the accuracy of the compacts on par with the Glocks I have worked with. So much so that they have turned into my EDC. I actually prefer the size of the original compact as it makes a much easier carry. Although I like the new compact, I can't see myself purchasing one and replacing my current Apex'd compacts.
 
3/4" is not too bad. 2.0 Compact mags might make a good wintertime/heavy clothing carry mag for my 1.0 40c if somebody will make some decent spacers. 13 > 10.

I guess I could try cutting down some XGrip spacers.
 
I just came home with my new 2.0 C in 9mm. I really like it's size and the full grip in the hand. I had the 1.0 compact in 9mm, but it never felt right because the grip was to short. My new 2.0 will become my EDC after I run a couple hundred rounds through it.
It fits perfect in my Sig P229 OWB belt holster and with a small modification, it fits perfectly in my Masters Shoulder holster.
 
M&P 40C... 1 or 2?

Holster makers must be pulling their hair out. It was bad enough before. :rolleyes:
 
For those of you who self-described themselfs as "fat" (and even not so), they make iwb holsters that cover the gun grip. Love the grip in my hand, but it wreak havoc on my "love handles". I just ordered one.
 
For those of you who self-described themselfs as "fat" (and even not so), they make iwb holsters that cover the gun grip. Love the grip in my hand, but it wreak havoc on my "love handles". I just ordered one.

If you saw me the word "fat" would not be in quotations. Lol
 
I sent my slide off to Robar for their NP3 finish and as soon as it returns I'll post some photos.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top