New Colt Python for January 2020?

More leaked pics.
 

Attachments

  • B35B295A-577C-48F9-8688-988FDD06637F.jpg
    B35B295A-577C-48F9-8688-988FDD06637F.jpg
    50 KB · Views: 145
  • 47FD16F1-5783-443B-8740-4344B863778D.jpg
    47FD16F1-5783-443B-8740-4344B863778D.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 122
Sig,

When I saw the stainless picture on this thread
I thought, and dismissed what I saw, a turn line
on the cylinder, unusual for a Python or a SAA
for that matter when it is perfectly timed.

Now seeing the bluish version, again a turn line
BUT I don't think it is. It may be a scoring on
the cylinder purposely put there.

I've seen this on a Grant Cunningham gun, a
Ruger, and I believe it is to help the timing and
smooth up the DA pull.

If what I think I saw, or did I see it, and I wonder
if I saw it, then Colt has definitely re-engineered
to an certain extent the Python.

Price and any new engineering will determine how
popular the NEW Python is, or maybe it should be
called the Python Classic. :D
 
Last edited:
A post from Marlinowners last August...

"We just started today, cutting the forging dies for the new Colt Pythons. Should be about 2 weeks when we start forging the frames. The steel is going to be 17-4PH stainless, VERY tough stuff."
 
"Leaked"??? LOL! If Colt really is going to start building Pythons again, why the coy and bashful act? Why aren't they announcing it far and wide?

I suspect they are waiting for the SHOT show in 3 weeks and a cover picture on every gun magazine.

Do you think its a hoax?
 
Last edited:
I suspect they are waiting for the SHOT show in 3 weeks and a cover picture on every gun magazine.

I suspect you are 99% correct. Trouble is targeting "hard core" Colt's purists. I don't think there are enough to rescue them from yet another fiscal hole they have engineered for the company. $1,000; $1295? Maybe be real competition for a very limited market ($800-$1K Rugers, $1K-$1600 SW's). $2400 to start, not happening for me. Joe
 
I seriously doubt that. Anyone that REALLY shoots a Pyhton instead of locking it away and bragging on it knows better. It doesn't take a whole lot of rounds to get out of time. The second leg on the hand will push the cyl into lockup when you pull the trigger when the timing goes bad. Mine has gone out of time twice. Both times I removed the hand and stretched (peened the sides) to bring it back into time. 50 years with S&W and I've never had to do that.

I have thousands of rounds through my 1979 Python that I bought new. It's tight as a drum and perfectly in time, even when cocked glacier slow. There are no absolutes, and I never trust statements that indicate absolutes, like all Pythons, or most Pythons, go out of time.
 
I hope Colt introduces 3 new revolvers this year and Taurus and Ruger and Webley and anyone else who will. I like revolvers and competition breeds excellence....................
 
The '78 vintage Python here has remained in time.

Now, that's what we need; a new Webley revolver. I could go for that.
 
I know that a Colt will maintain a higher "resale value" but my guns are not inventory. Does a Colt put a 357 round downrange any better than an S&W? Does a Colt improve the terminal velocity of a 357 round? Will a maintained Colt be operating after the equivalent maintained S&W no longer functions? This hobby is very much about everyone getting what they like, but, given the pricing differential, I am glad that I like S&Ws.
 
here is a bigger leaked picture, not the same frame as an original Python, the hammer looks shorter and I am willing to bet most of the internals will be MIM. Oh, and that isn't a "Royal Blue" finish either, if Colt offers that again, it might be a while.
 

Attachments

  • 28-B350-CA-B183-4530-9-B57-79924363-D014.jpg
    28-B350-CA-B183-4530-9-B57-79924363-D014.jpg
    49.9 KB · Views: 76
  • Like
Reactions: SRT
I have owned 4 original Pythons, 2 Troopers and 1 Detective Special back when they were being made. I can also work on them, so very familiar with the internal lockworks. I think the Python is the best looking revolver ever made. None of my Pythons would hold up to being used for competition. Back then, I was shooting around 30,000 .38 Specials and 3000 or so .357 Mag. per season.

The M19 I had then ran fine for 3 years of that diet. The forcing cone on that one never cracked (pretty amazing). The Pythons at their best never had as good an action as any of my S&W guns, all with action jobs. Out of the box, the Python actions were better than S&W actions for smoothness and lightness (2 different things). The Trooper actions were heavy and clunky. The D/S was the best of the lot, wish I still had it.

I shot M10s built into PPC guns a lot, their forcing cones always cracked between 50,000 and 100,000 rounds of bunny fart wadcutters. Once the L frames came on the scene, I switched over to them and never looked back. The 586 and 686 have served me very well for many years.

Pythons are cool guns to look at, but S&W ones are better for shooting a lot.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top