New Shield 380 EZ... Nope. Junk.

Register to hide this ad
Just because you don't want something does not mean that other people don't want it.

Beretta's Cheetah models are selling for $700-$800, indicating that someone wants mid-size .380 pistols.
 
Last edited:
It says right in the Julie Golob article that lots of people asked for it. Must be true.
lol8.gif


"When we set out to design the M&P380 Shield EZ pistol, our goal was to deliver an all-around, easy to use personal protection pistol – from loading and carrying, to shooting and cleaning. Throughout the development process, we focused on key areas that customers told us were important – the ease of racking the slide and loading the magazine. With that in mind, we reduced the amount of force required to rack the slide, and developed a magazine that is both easy and efficient to load. We have incorporated both of these new features into the M&P380 Shield EZ pistol, allowing consumers of all statures and strengths the opportunity to own, comfortably practice with, and effectively utilize this exciting new pistol. The new M&P380 Shield EZ pistol provides an easy-to-use personal protection option for both first-time shooters and experienced handgunners alike.” – Jan Mladek, General Manager of M&P and S&W Brands

Smith-Wesson-NEW-MP-2.0-in-380.jpg
 
if it is easier for some to rack and handle over say a Shield in 9mm, i dont see any reason to shoot it down before checking it out in person (pun intended lol).

I bet there is a market for something like this; perhaps like those with grip issues due to arthritis, age, etc but who still want a semi-auto. To me as long as it is built well and fills a need for other shooters, then it did its job.

If it isn't for me then i'll just pass on it, easy enough...
 
This is not "junk"... it's a viable option for women and the elderly who want the advantages of a semi-auto but have trouble with racking and loading. Lots of people like this, including my mother in law who has arthritis but would love a Shield for her home defense.
 
with the size of the thing according to the specs on S&W website, you might as well get a 9mm. That and for the likes of me, I can't figure out why they put a grip safety on a striker fired pistol the size of a regular shield?

Did S&W website get hacked? is this for real or a joke?
 
Last edited:
with the size of the thing according to the specs on S&W website, you might as well get a 9mm. That and for the likes of me, I can't figure out why they put a grip safety on a striker fired pistol the size of a regular shield?

Did S&W website get hacked? is this for real or a joke?

The pistol is not striker fired.

As to "might as well get a 9mm" my big, tough, retired-federal-agent neighbor said the same thing about his Ruger LC9 versus my wife's Ruger LC380. Then came the revelation at the range that the same pistol could be fired faster and more accurately in 380 than it could in 9mm.
 
Last edited:
For me I just don't get it. not at all. My wife has arthritis and Fibromyalgia and she racks her Shield 9mm no sweat and she is a small mid 50's woman. This .380 Shield is a stunt at best! WHY? Its bigger than a shield and if you can rack the .380 slide you can rack the 9mm shield slide. So my personal opinion is its a gun with no purpose and a major step back from the 9mm Shield!!
 
Looks like an M&P Compact .22 scaled up to .380. I like the internal hammer idea but the grip safety looks cobbled on. My M&P Compact has been 100%. Hope they’re not using an aluminum slide like the .22 - doubt it but who knows.
 
Last edited:
Well, that is amazing.

Does it draw its inspiration from the Colt 1903 Hammerless .32 ACP pistol, introduced in 1903 and made through 1945? That too was a pocket/purse gun that is easy to carry and easy to operate, with a built-in grip safety for the non-expert. The 1903 was followed by the Colt 1908 in .380 ACP.

I like the fact S&W is daring enough to put the grip safety on this pistol. That's kind of a oblique statement on the inherent "practical" safety of striker-fired guns in general, is it not? Perhaps those with light, short triggers most of all. I mean, in the hands of people with moderate levels of familiarity, experience, and training.

The spec sheet says this is a "internal hammer fired" pistol, aka "hammerless," design, again a lot like the Colt 1903/1908. That too is well-suited to the potential market.

The barrel on this pistol, at 3.675 inches, is almost an inch longer than the 2.75 inch barrel on the 380 Bodyguard. That means an increase in muzzle velocity of the M&P 380 EZ over the Bodyguard of over 100 fps, more or less (see "Ballistics by the Inch"), which will increase the effectiveness of the .380 round and lower blast and recoil. Another good idea (the Colt 1903/1908 has a 3.75 inch barrel in most variants).

And people bought almost 600,000 of those Colt 1903 and 1908s - amazing, considering the population was a third of what it is today. Everyone from bank couriers to gangster gunsels reportedly loved them for pocket carry in the 1920's and 1930's. Variants were issued to U.S. Army general officers into the 1970s. I've got a 1903, inherited from a grandfather (on my wife's side) who was a traveling salesman in Georgia in the 1920's. It's a joy to shoot, and exceptionally easy to carry -- although made of steel (24 ounces) and not "small" (6.75 inches long). It sure is thin and handy.

Anyway, this is interesting. Some will despise it, but there is a sort of genius to it. Like that Colt 1903.
 

Attachments

  • Colt Automatic Pistol 1903.jpg
    Colt Automatic Pistol 1903.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 808
  • Colt 1903 - 1.jpg
    Colt 1903 - 1.jpg
    83.8 KB · Views: 774
Last edited:
The pistol is not striker fired.

As to "might as well get a 9mm" my big, tough, retired-federal-agent neighbor said the same thing about his Ruger LC9 versus my wife's Ruger LC380. Then came the revelation at the range that the same pistol could be fired faster and more accurately in 380 than it could in 9mm.

yeah my bad, I just double checked on the specs, it's hammer fired. I am not at all in the least interested in this pistol. I hope it sells well for S&W.

I'm going to stick with my revolvers.
 
S&W knows exactly what it's doing. Nearly 25 percent jump in female buyers from 2005-2011. Women like lots of choices and they like more than one model, see below...

Women Are 'Fastest-Growing Group of Gun Owners' - Breitbart

my XDM 3.8C .45 has a grip safety on it and my wife loves that feature.I think S&W know what
they are doing. I personally have no need for something like this but if my wife wanted
to carry it , I'd say go for it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top