If one wants to finance political campaigns thru orgs like the ILA by all means do so. Personally I will do that thru a personal donation to the candidate of my choice and not someone elses. I know where the candidates stand on the issues and if they don't come across for me they don't get my vote again. That simple.
I will certainly do so.
Contributing to a candidate personally is all well and good. I do so myself.
However, NRA/ILA is able to combine the $50 contributions from thousands and thousands of members. My $50 contribution to ILA, combined with similar donations from a few hundred thousand other members, makes it possible for NRA to target specific races. They don't, because of FEC rules, donate much money to candidates' campaign funds. What they can do, thanks to the SCOTUS decision in
Citizens United vs. FEC, is to purchase "advocacy ads" on radio and tv, promoting pro-gun candidates, and exposing anti-gun candidates. I would expect these ads to start showing up right here in Georgia, where Michelle Nunn is mounting a serious campaign for the open Senate seat.
What is wrong, in your view, with members of an organization, whether it be NRA, NAACP, ACLU, or the Teamsters Union pooling their money to promote a particular candidate they feel is amicable to their policy positions?
I call it free speech. I call it "peaceable assembly" to "petition the government for a redress of grievances."
One definition of
assembly is "the action of gathering together as a group for a common purpose."
I choose to gather together with ever how many millions of NRA members there are to make sure my government follows my wishes to the greatest extent possible.