OK, so what do you FEED that self defense shottie?

Just what the thread title says, "What do you keep loaded in your self defense shotgun?"

  • 00 buckshot

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • some other buckshot ('splain your answer)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • slugs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • combination of buckshot & slugs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • something else (please explain)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Whatever is handy. It's a shotgun, inside the house; anything works for SD. I like to mix it up a little and surprise 'em.

To tell the truth, in all the excitement I'm not sure what I may have loaded...could be buck, could be slug, could be birdshot, could be rocksalt....so, do you feel lucky? <sound of 870 racking...>
 
I don't have any self defense "shottie's".
306801442.jpg


I do keep my Mossberg 590 shotgun loaded with Remington LE 8 pellet 00 buckshot.
 
Originally posted by Faulkner:
I don't have any self defense "shottie's".
306801442.jpg
Thank you, Faulkner. That is one irritating term. It's just so precious that it's hard to imagine any man using it with a straight face.
 
ParadiseRoad,
Thanks for the link. For decades, I always thought that #4 was, well......#4, and buckshot was either O-buck, OO-buck, or OOO-buck.

I just may have to pick up some #2 or #4 buckshot. Seems like a happy medium.

Appreciate the info.

WG840
 
4 Buck=27 pellets...big enough to get the job done but wont over penetrate in the house
 
Winchester Model 1300, #0 buck.

Why? More pellets than #oo, more penetration than #4 and I bought 40 boxes on clearance about 2 years ago.
icon_biggrin.gif
 
Originally posted by mjr:
Originally posted by Faulkner:
I don't have any self defense "shottie's".
306801442.jpg
Thank you, Faulkner. That is one irritating term. It's just so precious that it's hard to imagine any man using it with a straight face.

I didn't realize that was such an offensive term. I went to edit the original post, but doing so would reset the poll results. Maybe we could get Lee to add it to the list of banned words.

icon_wink.gif
 
Thank you, Faulkner. That is one irritating term. It's just so precious that it's hard to imagine any man using it with a straight face.

...maybe they all dance the Schottische...

1schot1.gif




.
 
reerc, for all I know, Faulkner and I are the only two on the board who don't like the term. But if you really tried to edit the original post, thanks!
 
Originally posted by Faulkner:
I don't have any self defense "shottie's".
306801442.jpg


I do keep my Mossberg 590 shotgun loaded with Remington LE 8 pellet 00 buckshot.

I tend to agree here too. The only thing I dislike about the well known rimfire site is the constant reference to Leupies, Mossys, Remmys, Bushys, Winnies etc etc.
icon_smile.gif

However I enjoyed this thread. Thanks.
 
I use low recoil slugs only because i have to.I have a mossberg 500 12g with a rifled slug barrel.
pic001.jpg
 
I just have to comment here: I have been carrying weapons professionally for just short of 46 years now, in all possibe scenarios, military, LE, instructor, contractor etc...
I have always tried to have a shotgun in the mix because they are great for close in work-like HD, or defending a fixed post in heavy cover, or, or, or.
Now to get to ammo. I have seen some truly scary comments above:
1. Birdshot is for the birds, it will leave a large shallow wound which may be disfiguring, but it may not be lethal. Just what you do NOT want, a disfigured wounded felon to sue you later, or to kill you because he was not stopped.
2. Buckshot is designed for animals of medium size, like large deer, now what or who does that sound like? Select the type of buck you feel is good for your situation from #1 on up it will do well. So will slugs, again dependent on you physical layout.
3. NEVER, NEVER mix loads in your magazine. The pros have enough trouble trying to remember what was up first, what is up now and so forth. To the point that virtually ALL military/LE organizations prohibit mixing loads in the mag. Some even prohibit carrying different loads on the person. Some exceptions are made for SWAT or other hyper trained personnel, but even they are prohibited from mixing loads in the mag. Why? Because after any fatal shooting there are 2 legal aftermaths, criminal and civil. The criminal investigation usually dosen't bother anyone whose heart was in the right place. BUT the civil suit will give one fits. You do not want to be saying whay one load was more or less deadly than another, and why you had those loads mixed up in the mag, there is no way you can come out of those questions looking good-and it is the BGs lawyers job to make you look bad.
And for Gods own sake. NEVER use less lethal ammo, or ammo that you may think is less lethal because if it produces a lethal result, your legal goose is cooked-at least at the civil trial. Using less lethal ammo lethally just screams negliegence-which is what the lawyer for the plaintiff wants.
You should not care if the BG is dead or not, as long as he is stopped, but a dead BG is far better for the shootere legally. Only one story, limits on damages in many states, AND you do not have to explain why he was so badly disfigured or maimed for life by your "unique" ammo selection.
 
Originally posted by reerc:
Originally posted by mjr:
Originally posted by Faulkner:
I don't have any self defense "shottie's".
306801442.jpg
Thank you, Faulkner. That is one irritating term. It's just so precious that it's hard to imagine any man using it with a straight face.

I didn't realize that was such an offensive term. I went to edit the original post, but doing so would reset the poll results. Maybe we could get Lee to add it to the list of banned words.

icon_wink.gif

Hey, no problem, no offense taken. The term just seems, well, kind of mushy.

Otherwise, lots of good info on this thread.
 
Back
Top