Old School Ad. Ruger vs SW

Register to hide this ad
There's nothing inherently wrong with investment castings such as the high quality castings made by Ruger. A prime difference is that since castings have no grain they need to be thicker for equal strength to a forging. Ruger has been riding that pony for years without telling the entire truth. Investment casting does have advantages otherwise as well...but that's not the point of those ads.

There's good castings and poor castings...there's good forgings and poor forgings.
 
Both companies made/make excellent products right here in America. It's a difficult industry, given the high cost of skilled labor, anti-gun legislation, spurious lawsuits and bad press. Just look at how many gunmakers have changed hands over the years.

Having said that, I find people and businesses who disparage their competition distasteful and tacky. Have a little class... Talk yourself up, don't talk others down.
 
You don't have a handle on politics, do you? ;)
That disgusts me...

I won't comment further, because I don't want Danno to ding me!
Zipped!!
hqdefault.jpg
 
I remember this add very well. I have a lot of respect for Ruger. They did a great job with there first products. The Standard Auto, Blackhawks and Six Sixes are still going strong and for a good reason.

The Security Six was a great start in the DA revolver market. The design was promoted as being easily adapted to modern production methods that Ruger has always made good use of.
 
I'm at least a little bit qualified to comment on (some) Rugers, having had a collection of all the 3 screw single actions----and some more qualified to comment on S&W's, having had a collection of all the (real) target guns (from the beginning to the end of the 5 screws (and the four autoloaders I deemed relevant)---along with several target grade guns from the same period.

The Rugers were well designed and well built guns---aside from the fact the larger fame guns were a bit on the clunky side.

The S&W's were quite simply works of art---every one.

Ralph Tremaine
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, the ad war. My cousin, who is a big Ruger fan, is the person that got me into hand gunning by letting me shoot his Ruger Security Six .357 Magnum. I soon decided that I wanted to purchase my own, and I ended up with a 6" barrel M28-2. Not too long afterward, the S&W "Ruger burger" ad came out, and when my cousin saw it, he was not so amused.

We kidded each other back and forth about our gun choices, and I decided to up the level the next time we went to the range. When he wasn't looking, I tuck a few of those little ketchup packets you get at the fast food places, into his range bag.

After I dropped him home from the range, when I got home there was a message on my answering machine... my cousin found the ketchup packets and was cussing me out. I got a big laugh, and that wasn't the only time that the ketchup packets made an appearance in his range bag.
 
Last edited:
All I read was "Meooooowwww!"
Really, I have both brands and have no issues with either one. I finally got a Security Six from the first year (Thanks Roy) 1972 since I have a couple Pre-model numbered S&Ws and some newer. I never saw a Sec. Six in real life, but it's like TJ Watt & JJ Watt compared with the GP100. But, neither have any curb appeal; they just work. The S&Ws have some class. They both spin the same direction & both just work.
 
One thing that gives Ruger revolvers their strength is the one-piece, no side plate design. The thicker metal is that way to give the investment casting equal strength with the forging of the Smith and like makes. Combine the thicker steel and no side plate design and you have a strong revolver. The forged Smith is strong with a side plate.

Two different design and manufacturing technologies and philosophies that accomplish the same thing…strong, durable revolvers.
 
Thanks for the chuckles, OP. Some of the follow-ups are also chuckle-worthy. Too bad that most of today's advertising doesn't have the humor of the past. I remember enjoying a well-crafted ad. They actually caught my attention.

Volkswagen used to tickle my sense of humor. I always enjoyed the Clydesdale ads. Any of you PNW folks remember Rainier Beer commercials? For example the guy on a motorcycle with the sound effects of: Rayyyyyy Neeeeeerrrrr Beeeeeeerrrrr.... as he headed off into the distance. Or the frogs croaking rain-ear, rain-ear.

Lots of today's ads play on people's insecurities. If they were more humorous I'd have less use for the mute button.

Back to the original topic: I have both S&Ws and Rugers in my stable. Ruger can't compare to a slicked up 586 or a Model 24. By the same token, S&W doesn't even know how to spell No.1.
 
Last edited:
I have a 3 inch GP100 in 44 Special because the 696s had developed the Hilary Hole, and I would have none of that nonsense. After a Bowen rear sight, and Wolf springs, the chunky GP100 is a good gun. It's a Clydesdale. Smiths are Thoroughbreds.

Do you remember when Armalite and Springfield Armory were going at it? Springfield proclaimed to be giving you a bunch of upgrades at no extra charge. In response, Armalite said if you buy one of their rifles, they would give you a $10 toaster. It was hilarious!

I still have the toaster…..
 
Last edited:
I recall a tale of Ruger's rep demonstrating a Security-6 for a PD, or LE-officials. Something about throwing one down a stretch of asphalt, then picking it up to fire (or perhaps just dry-fire?) all six. Me thinks that odds are not in favor of a typical S&W hammer spur surviving such without getting bent.
 
I used to get a good laugh while reading those ads in the gun rags. Back then, I do believe that what the S&W ad said was pretty true in that Ruger's had to be overly bulky and heavy to make up for the weaker cast parts and frame. Today, S&W is using cast parts as well - but as time went on they improved the process.

IMHO, over the past few decades, Ruger's manufacturing and QC has gone way up while S&W's has dropped like a rock. While I have never been a Ruger fan, they do make a bunch of guns now that are very worthy of looking at. A few friends recently purchased a few Ruger LCP Max's and a few of the Mark 4's. I have to say that with the exception of the trigger pulls on the 22's that suck, the pistols themselves are very well executed! Now that the S&W Company has moved to TN, let's hope they get their act together! For them to not realize there is a MAJOR problem is impossible! Like I have stated many times, quality comes from the top down.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top