MaximumLawman
Member
The trend away from revolvers in LE started back in the 80's, because there was a perception that cops were suddenly "outgunned" by gang-bangers who were all supposedly toting MAC-10's and AK-47's. The issue was capacity, not reliability.
When we transitioned to autopistols in the early 90's at my last two police departments, qualification scores dropped......for some officers qualification was VERY difficult. The manual of arms was far more complex, and it did cause problems. Training and equipment budgets, already strained, had to be bolstered to get officers up to speed on the autos, and it often took twice as much practice ammo before officers were considered proficient with their new sidearms. But it was NEVER about reliability!
I think the trend had a lot to do with reliability, AND the double-action triggers on other autos after the 39 and 59. I came on with a Model 10 and 12 extra rounds...in loops....6 for the skinny guys. The only semi autos that were authorized for carry after self-purchase were Model 39's and 59's and Walther 380's for off-duty. Other than those two autos we had to carry Smith or Colt revolvers, 4" or longer and .38 or up. And yes, we WERE outgunned when we were taking Uzi's and Mac-10's and AR-15's and AK-47's and various other hi-cap pistols and SMG's off the street every single day. There were plenty of times when 6 rounds and a reload from loops were not realistically enough to fight your way back to the car for the optional WWII M-1 carbine or 870 that most of us carried. We were not authorized to carry any other autos until the Smith 645 came out and finally the Glocks after a lot of testing specifically for reliability.
And looking at what the youngster cops are carrying on and off-duty today, I think it's more than reasonable to say that revolvers are not very popular anymore.
I will agree that many Depts issue semi autos. Not sure too many issue automatics.
"Auto" in my post is short for "auto loader" for those who want to be picky.
Last edited: