Opinions on M&P 9 vs Glock 9

[howard829]

I have been on the fence lately about purchasing an M&P 9 FS or a .40. Today I had a chance to fire both at my LGS. Unfortunately the two guns were made by Glock. The Glocks were the Polymer style similar to the M&P's. My question is...would there be any difference in the recoil or general feel of the M&P vs the Glock? Since this was my first impression of the 9 and the 40, I will say the .40 had quite a kick to it. Probably more than I would like to be honest. I presently have an M&P 22. Any comments would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Howard

 

[Nevadadvx]

I just replaced my Glock 19 Gen4, with an M&P 9 full size. In my particular case, I had an issue with the Glock grip. In a panic situation, I always aimed high after drawing from a holster. The Glocks are fine pistols to be sure, but don't fit everyone because of their grip angle.

I really like how easy Glocks are to take down, plus you can put any 9mm mag in the baby Glock G26, which I also have. I even have a 33 rounder that will work in my G26 or the G19 I had.

That all said, I REALLY love the ergonomics of the M&P, and I shoot better with it because of it. I am currently trying to find a Shield to replace the G26. As far as recoil, the G19 or M&P are not excessive in 9mm, very easy to handle. You really need to handle both of them and see which one fits you best.

I also recently got an M&P 22 and love it, which was my main reason for replacing the G19. I love the feel of the 22, and the 9mm is almost identical in size and ergonomics. The 22 is a bit lighter is about the only difference.

 

[pazzo]

The MP40 is one soft shooting .40. Much more so than the G23 Gen4. Not sure about the G22.

 

[mgo]

The main reason I prefer the S&W M&P over the Glock is shooting comfort. I get a pretty unpleasant "trigger slap" when firing the Glock which results in a sore trigger finger for a few days. The S&W trigger has a smooth trigger face and does not cause discomfort. I need to add that the optional S&W thumb safety allows for safer holstering; a big item for me when putting the pistol on for carry.

 

[2tango2]

I own a Glock 19 and 26 and find that my FS9 and Shield shoot softer than the Glocks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

[BobC357]

The M&P has been referred to as the "Comfortable Glock". I went with the M&P.

 

[treiz]

I've had both Glocks and M&Ps and while both are excellent guns I prefer the M&P for its ergonomics and the fact that it shoots smoother. I would stick with the 9mm, the 40 isn't worth the decreased mag capacity and it's less controllable than 9mm.

 

[howard829]

Thanks for the replies and comments. When I was looking for a gun, the look and feel of the M&P really had me convinced it was what I wanted. I enjoy the M&P 22 I have and I'm sure I'll be very satisfied with the 9 as well.

Since my .22 has the "thumb safety" I see no reason to change when going to the 9mm. Are there any pro or cons to the thumb safety? This will be used for home use/some range time.

Thanks...Howard

 

[IMKen]

I've had both Glocks and M&Ps and while both are excellent guns I prefer the M&P for its ergonomics and the fact that it shoots smoother. I would stick with the 9mm, the 40 isn't worth the decreased mag capacity and it's less controllable than 9mm.

I bought a G 26 first, It was a fine gun but just did not fit my hand.
I even thought about having a grip job done on it.
Instead I sold it and bought a M&P 9c.
It fits my hand just right, and is every bit a good as the Glock.

 

[fdw]

I rented the glock 9mm when trying to decide between the glock and smith. But the m&p felt so much better in my hand and I found a pretty good price on a kit with the 3 pads, speed loader, holster, etc. and bough it. I've been very pleased. No regrets.

 

[charger73se]

I have a gen 3 & 4 glock 22. I have them because I'm required to carry one on duty. I just ordered a m&p 40c to carry off duty because the ergonomics are so much better than the glock, plus I'm southpaw so I like the fully ambi pistol. I think both are fine guns. The m&p just fits my hand better. I would love a shield, but s&w didn't feel the need to make it ambi.

 

[danysw]

I have a G19 and G26, M&P9 and M&P9c. All of them are wonderful, the simplicity of the Glocks is outstanding and the stock trigger is IMO better but the ergonomics and accuracy of the M&P are superior.

 

[Harrison]

I have a M&P9 and 45. Both are FS. I also have a GenI and a GenIII Glock 19. I will carry either of the glocks, especially if I think I might have to actually use either one of them. Glock 9mm reliabilty is proven. I can shoot the Glocks just as accurately as the M&Ps and the triggers are much better. I admit the M&P grip is slightly more ergonomic, but the pistol itself is overly complicated compared to the glock. Smith has had problems with the M&P9 regarding accuracy, barrel fit, early unlocking, and a strange twist for the 9mm luger cartridge. I will not comment on the 40S&W. I much prefer the 45acp over the 40, in any pistol.

 

[scattershot]

IMHO, the M&P is what the Glock should have been. Better ergos, better trigger, and a comfortable grip. I have both, and prefer the M&P 40c over the Glock hands down. Get the .40 and a 9mm barrel, and you're covered either way.

 

[DigiRebel]

OP TY for the question! I am hunting for a 9mm for my wife. I've seen a lot of suggestions in favor of the Glock (especially with the 4th gen pistol grip adjustability)

I'd have bought a 19 or 26 straight out the door... except, there isn't one to be had anywhere near me. I chatted with the guy at my LGS today he suggested considering a ruger 9mm (which he was sold out on). They also had a bunch of Smith and Wessons in stock, and no one needs to tell me that S&W is usually a quality product.

Discussion here has me considering M&P over a Glock... how do the ruger 9mms weigh in??

 

[loveMD]

Ruger sr9 or sr9c are good value and Imo worth consideration. Ruger availability is tough right now though. I would rate m&p and glock better but many would not, good American gun.

 

[spad124]

Never could warm up to Glocks. I've tried a few but didn't like the grips. The M&P 9 or .40 has a much more comfortable and secure feeling grip for my hand. One gets used to the trigger if you practice enough.

 

[jajo]

I've had an M&P 9mm full size pistol for about a year. I liked the gun enough that I recently bought a 9mm Shield to carry.

I don't own a Glock. But, I don't understand the comments that the S&W is more complicated than the Glock.

Field strip is simple. The pistol is reliable. I have about 2500 rounds through the FS 9mm with no issues. I've shot various brands and weights of ammo through mine with complete success.

At a price under $500 out the door, it is a reliable gun and good value. I couldn't have asked for more.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

[Masterorion9]

If you can afford it I say get both. I love my M&P9 FS, especially after putting another $200 in it to get it exactly the way I want. The ergos are phenomenal and the Apex Tactical trigger makes it a dream to shoot, especially rapid fire. I even put in a Costa Catalyst b/c my thumbs don't quite reach w/o breaking grip. It is always the first gun I pick up to shoot, and the last. That being said...

I love my Glock 19 gen 2. At first I wasn't sure I'd made the right decision to trade my SAA for it. And instead of buying an expensive trigger kit I bought some Flitz and started polishing the trigger bar. It was better but hated the grooved trigger so I replaced it with a G17 trigger and polished that up. Hate to admit it but I'm more accurate with this gun than my M&P9. Despite the ungainly grip circumference this is a solid shooter and deserves respect.

 

[highaltitude]

Both are great guns. I looked seriously at the M&P FS and the M&P 9c, but ended up choosing the Glock 19 Gen 4 and really like the gun. For me, the M&P FS was bigger than I wanted and the M&P 9c grip was a bit short for my hand (my Shield fits me better). The G19 offered 15+1 rounds in a relatively tight package. Some people like the grip angle and some don't. I never saw it as an issue and shoot it just fine along with my Shield 9mm.

 

[getoff]

having owned both, the m&p is easier to shoot and softer recoiling. that said i did have a malfunction where the round did not fully chamber and the ejector caused an out of battery discharge. i still own my g19 and as said it is not as comfy. glock knuckle is what they call it. a little work with a dremmel on the under side of the trigger guard fixed that. i also like that the g19 is a little smaller, critical for EDC.

 

[danysw]

I don't own a Glock. But, I don't understand the comments that the S&W is more complicated than the Glock.
Field strip is simple. The pistol is reliable. I have about 2500 rounds through the FS 9mm with no issues. I've shot various brands and weights of ammo through mine with complete success.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Arguing about accuracy, ergonomics and trigger feel between Glocks and M&Ps is one thing but arguing about simplicity is different. You need to own a Glock in order to know how simple they are. You can detail strip three Glocks in the same time you can do just one M&P. That is a fact.

 

[Arik]

I had both but sold the M&P. I still like the M&P and own a MP45. Both fit my hand, were comfortable and reliable. My Glock 19 had a slightly better accuracy. In the end i sold the M&P because of the trigger. It was atrocious and im not picky about triggers. It never got better with use so i sold it. On the other hand my M&P45 is a dream to shoot.

You cant go wrong with either.

And yes the Glock is faster to field strip.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

 

[Shuutr]

I had both and sold the glock. I added the DCAEK kit to the M&P which solved the trigger and the ergos are better. All else was equal in my opinion.

 

[loveMD]

Curious if the new trigger components now on m&Ps will help get closer to glock in trigger satisfaction.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

 

[budrichard]

I have M&P9 and G19 GEN4.
These polymer, striker fired pistols are commodities.
NEither is better, it all depends on what YOU like.
Any will do the job.-Dick

 

[coobie]

Both are very nice dependable pistols.I have owned and shot both.Sold the glock and kept the M&P it seemed to fit me better