There's been a few threads on the subject. I don't, offhand, remember any definitive decision, one way or the other. The biggest differences seem to be a 2" longer, fluted barrel and a tighter chamber that won't take Stingers.
And don't forget the match trigger![]()
And don't forget the match trigger![]()
I would have expected more trouble chambering cheap Remington and Winchester than any CCI. I'll have to search some more as I didn't find much yet.
Have you tried one? Does that trigger compare to a good aftermarket trigger?
Actually, the dimensions on .22 LR are fairly consistent, except for rim thickness. Stingers are longer than regular .22s and won't seat in the PS's chamber.
The Rock River is an aftermarket trigger. From what I've read it's on the lower end of the market.
I once had a match single shot that would chamber anything except Remington Goldens. Their tolerances were so bad they wouldn't fit it. I never tried the Stingers and had forgotten about the length difference.
What you read is right. It's an improvement over stock but not a big one. I have one that's coming out when my Jard gets here.
I learned the hard way that match chambers are laws unto themselves, too.
I have one in my 77/22 that will eat anything, but the one in my High Standard Trophy Supramatic is very picky.
Which Jard are you getting? I have the single-stage adjustable with the 1.5 pound trigger spring. It yields a measured (Lyman digital scale) of 2.2 pounds with zero over travel and creep. I bought it used for $125 and have never regretted it. The only rifle I have with more than a 3.0 pound trigger is my National Match Garand and it's a 4.5 pound two-stage that breaks like the proverbial glass rod.