Performance Center - still poor production

I've got a Model 41at was built in November 2008. Run well enough until a few month ago with constant failure to feed and eject. I took the steps in replacing the extractor with a Volquartsen Exact Edge, replacing all springs including the recoil spring and firing pin spring. I also cleaned all my magazines and reassembled them correctly. I'm hoping I don't have to send the gun back to the mother ship and nothing gets done. Looks like I am progressing well enough as I'm seeing good results when I'm out at the range.
 
Last edited:
Solid Hit; You mentioned possibly moving to HK or Sig. Well, I belong to the Ruger, Glock, and Sig forums, and your sentiments are also reflected on those sites. I no longer own guns from Glock or Sig, but just like to read what's happening in the industry. I'm now concentrating on 1980 and older S&W revolvers and the old adage " they don't make 'em like they used to" has never been truer from what I've seen and read regarding all manufacturers. IMHO, an mint example of a pre-1990 41 would be the way to go. Just sayin' :)

Pretty much sums it up. Thanks to shall we say current policies every gun maker in the land is "making hay while the sun shines". Gun companies are taking advantage of a situation that is allowing them to move lots of product and make a lot of profit. You currently see this with most manufacturers as gun ownership skyrockets. Gun companies profit, most neophytes don't take notice (some hardly ever shoot their guns so problems go unnoticed) and enthusiasts suffer through endless headaches with a subpar product. If and when this craziness all ends who will still be buying their products?
 
I purchased 7 handguns last year.
1 Smith and Wesson
4 glocks
2 CZ's
The S&W was junk and was sold. The barrel had maching marks across the lands.
I had ejection issues with 1 glock I fixed it myself.

All the others have been perfect.

The only way they will change is when it hurts their bottom line.
 
Last edited:
Hanging out on gun forums CAN BE a really negative experience. That is because all of them - S&W, Glock, SIG Sauer, etc., etc. are overloaded with complaints.

I am not trying to discount the experience of the OP, but we must all take a breath and realize that the number of complaints is far outweighed by the silent majority who have good experiences, and therefore, do not feel the reason to bash.

I will offer these thoughts in no particular order: (1) I try to read through these types of threads to see pictures (almost never provided); (2) I check to see how many posts by the complainer (almost always an alarmingly low number - I have never joined a forum just to bash a product); (3) I am truly interested in the final diagnosis from S&W, and it is either never reported due to no follow-up by the complainer or the horrible weapon is sold in record time (hard to believe if it is so obviously defective such as when it is missing its rear sight - and yes, it could have been put back in, but how long does it take the new owner to figure that one out); (4) it always concerns me when I hear that a gun is so bad that the person writing will just never own (name your brand) again because I wonder if the condition was truly represented to the buyer; and (5) the telephone works just fine and in the case of almost any service call, I find that SPEAKING TO A LIVE PERSON in a polite way is ALWAYS very effective (we are or have raised a generation of people who do not know how to speak on the phone?).

Again, I am sorry for the OP's experience (I assume for purposes of this post that it has been accurately reported), but I would have spoken to someone at S&W, as I have always done on the exceedingly rare occasion when it was necessary. If it is sent back "on their dime," with free shipping, at least it is only time which is invested. I, for one, do not have the patience to wait for email responses as many complainers do when they post their experiences on this forum.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top