Guns from that era are big.
People talk about weight and size like it's a bad thing, but unless you're carrying all day, it's desirable. Fits the hand better, tames recoil, etc. Makes range time pleasant and fun, and if it's on the nightstand or in the truck, size isn't that huge an issue for defense either.
Another issue- in the 90's, a large amount of available guns were known models that had been around awhile, and were maybe getting slight tweaks to improve them.
I see people talk about warranties today, and speak of the customer service they've received from places, and how they get things fixed, like that's a fantastic thing.
Maybe it's blind luck on my part, but I have a lot of older guns, and I just don't know anything about warranties and customer service... because I haven't needed to use any. Yes, the 25 yr old extractor on a CZ 75 finally lost it's bite, and I replaced it for $30. But outside of that, little to nothing. I'd be furious if I had to test a warranty within a year, not pleased that they honor it, but angry that the darn thing needed it in the first place.
Just seemed like there was more emphasis on getting out a pistol that ran ("built like a tank" seems to be the consensus), back then.
My rant about reliable guns is based on the Shield reviews I've seen- there are lots of "what a great price this is" threads, but also a lot of "I needed to send it back in for ___" too. The ratio of complaints to praise is way too high for my liking, but lots of folks seem to just dismiss that due to warranties. Gun does you no good sitting in the shop.