Please tell me all about the 696

The Rossi 720 (think "narrow" M696) came with fluted and unfluted cylinders. Mine came with the fluted cylinder and weighs 6oz less than my 696-1 (30oz vs. 36oz). I don't think the M696 ever came from the factory with the unfluted cylinder, but where S&W is concerned it's foolhardy to say "never"...
 
My 696 no dash. I had the front sight replaced and it's now DAO. Wouldn't trade it for anything.

IMG_1264Medium.jpg



I paid $399 brand new in June 1997.
 
My dash 2, yes it has the lock, no I don't care, I was thrilled to find one. I got off of the forum here a few years ago for $400, no, it's not for sale.

DSC00151.jpg
 
My 696 no dash. I had the front sight replaced and it's now DAO. Wouldn't trade it for anything.

IMG_1264Medium.jpg



I paid $399 brand new in June 1997.

Uuughh!! another bobbed hammer....
When are people going to realize that if the revolver did get hung up while being drawn from the pocket or whatever, that it'd more likely be the rear sight that would hang up and not the hammer spur?

In this instance, there's no reason to limit one's self to DAO.
 
I had a 696 about five years back (when I could buy Blazer 200 gr Gold Dots for $12.96/50 rounds).

It was one of three .44 Spls I had at the time; the other two were a Taurus 441 (blued 3") and an S&W 396 (Sc/Ti 3").

The 696 was the best shooter of the three, the 396 was the best to carry but not pleasant to shoot.

The Taurus is still owned by a good friend a few states over. I occasionally borrow it when I visit him. The other two are long gone.

IMHO, 5-shot .44 Spls are great in theory (unique and desireable) but come up short in practical application. My impressions are seriously biased towards carry guns. If you cannot carry, my impressions/opinions are null and void.

Enjoy, Rich
 
Last edited:
Love to have one of those little 41's to CCW, but would rather have a 44 mag that size and down load some 240gr or 300 gr rounds for CCW.

But for now I'll stick with my 10mm's, and my G29 CCW or my M-61-3 pocket gun when necessary. Just kidding about the 61, not sure I could ever feel good about carrying a rim-fire.
 
Uuughh!! another bobbed hammer....
When are people going to realize that if the revolver did get hung up while being drawn from the pocket or whatever, that it'd more likely be the rear sight that would hang up and not the hammer spur?

In this instance, there's no reason to limit one's self to DAO.

It's called personal preference. We still have that liberty in America, contrary to popular opinion.
 
I wanted a 696 but was not going to pay what they were asking for them So I bought a 396 Night Guard. I really like it.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00089.jpg
    DSC00089.jpg
    59.7 KB · Views: 55
It's called personal preference. We still have that liberty in America, contrary to popular opinion.

Oh...is that what it's called?
Oh, what the hell...you got me.... You got me pegged! I'm a Tree-hugging, Left-wing Democrap!! And I don't believe anyone has a Right to any opinion that doesn't match mine.

Please...gimme a break! I was merely pointing out that some people bob their hammers to avoid getting hung up, but then overlook the rear sight - which is even more likely to hang up. That's all....

Believe me...if you knew me personally, you'd know that I respect everyone's right to their own opinion.

Good night, and enjoy the rest of this holiday weekend.
 
Uuughh!! another bobbed hammer....
When are people going to realize that if the revolver did get hung up while being drawn from the pocket or whatever, that it'd more likely be the rear sight that would hang up and not the hammer spur?

In this instance, there's no reason to limit one's self to DAO.

I got tired of banging my elbow on the damned thing. And yes, the sights will probably be the next thing to go. I do not feel "limited" by DAO, all of my carry revolvers are that way, It's just personal preference.
 
Love to have one of those little 41's to CCW, but would rather have a 44 mag that size and down load some 240gr or 300 gr rounds for CCW.

But for now I'll stick with my 10mm's, and my G29 CCW or my M-61-3 pocket gun when necessary. Just kidding about the 61, not sure I could ever feel good about carrying a rim-fire.

Sorry, I don't get it. You would rather have a 44 magnum that size then download? I own 10 to 1 the number of 44 mags to 44 specials, but if you had a size perfect 44 special, why would you rather have a 44 magnum and then down load to 44 special specifications? Seems like the 696 is what you want by your description, but perhaps I am missing something. Yes, currently you can purchase a 44 mag for considerably less and if that is your logic, then you are making a practical decision. Good luck on your ventures.
 
A 696 with fixed sights and a bobbed hammer, now there's an idea!

Its even a good idea, but for now, I think mine will remain original. Except I did put Pachy's on it, but that's easily reversible. Come to think of it, the spurless hammer is fairly easily reversible.
 
Sorry, I don't get it. You would rather have a 44 magnum that size then download? I own 10 to 1 the number of 44 mags to 44 specials, but if you had a size perfect 44 special, why would you rather have a 44 magnum and then down load to 44 special specifications? Seems like the 696 is what you want by your description, but perhaps I am missing something. Yes, currently you can purchase a 44 mag for considerably less and if that is your logic, then you are making a practical decision. Good luck on your ventures.
I guess I didn't explain it too clear, sorry. It has to due with the option to have a wider range of loads available is all. But the 696 is great because it's L frame SS and still makes a good CCW, but none of the SS N frames really fill that bill. The closest being the Nightguard and as light as that is I would need 44spl loads for average smuck I bet. Besides I'm not real found of the wonder alloy guns. I had a 360SC that killed on both ends because it was only about 15 oz when loaded. Sold it to a member here, who dearly loves the gun for trail carry.
 
Last edited:
link to handloads.com article

I've always thought that these are one of the most attractive revolvers around. This article has some interesting opinions on "the dainty little S&W 696":

The .44 Special Revisited
 
Thanks!
The picture of Allen-frame and link of MS have convinced me. Such a 696 would be very nice for me.
I don't daily Cary since that is absolute not allowed in Holland as most European country's. I do sport shooting and we normally shoot 5 rounds on each target. So the 696 fit's 100%!
 
Yes, the SS 696 was made in a wide range of barrel lengths.... okay, just 3" only! Some 696-1, which is the model I have, were aftermarket fitted with compensation. The one my dealer replaced mine with in the display case was comped - and sat for a while. Actually, when I bought mine, 1/2003, it's yellow '$439' price tag was faded by the flurescent lights. I also bought a new 296, the AirLite-Ti 2.5" hammerless Al/Ti version, for $349 - less another $10 because I bought both - my biggest S&W purchase day until my PC627 UDR in April of this year.

They made the 696 initially, followed by the MIM hammer/trigger & frame-mounted fp 696-1, and then, in late 2001-2002, the IL-equipped 696-2 - which may be the rarest. All - as well as the 296 & 396 models - have a dimunitive forcing cone. Be careful of 'hot' loads - this is not an 'Elmer Keith' level .44 Special revolver. At it's 35.5 oz level, you only need to add another 6 oz to get a really capable .44 Special - one that will obviously take 'Keith' level .44 Specials - it's a 4" 629 - a true .44 Magnum!

IMG_3509.jpg


I'll sell my 3" 696 long before the 4" 629, actually, a current production 629-6 SKU #163603. You gain another inch of barrel, another hole in the cylinder, and larger hammer and trigger, not to mention the higher energy level capability. I've seen new 4" 629's for less than the used 696 prices, too. Something else to consider.... and, you gain another caliber - .44 Russian, Special, and Magnum!

Stainz

PS I know, the 696 is cute... but the 4" 629 is practical.
 
Back
Top