hkcavalier
US Veteran
Why not look at film with a critical eye? Why should viewers just meekly accept whatever film makers decide to feed them? Why pay good money or waste time on an inferior product?
Russell Crowe was great in Master and Commander, but fell on his butt in 3:10 To Yuma. Christian Bale was really pretty good as Melvin Purvis in Public Enemies, but he totally sucked as Dan What's-His-Name in 3:10 To Yuma.
As for nature documentaries, at least the viewer can learn something from them now and then.
I won't even comment on so-called "reality TV".
This is what happens when the movie plot depends on characters doing things "normal" people would not.
Every horror movie. "Gee...all my friends have disappeared. Guess I'll hop in the shower." "The TV talks to me directly. I need to figure out why even if it kills me. No I won't leave the house!"
As someone who dabbles in novel writing, this is pretty glaring in a lot of movies. People watching a movie tend to finish unless it just gawdawful. It's only 90ish minutes, right? Especially if you paid money for the privilege of watching it in a theater. A book? Man...people will slam that down and never touch it again if you have a totally unrealistic plot (unless that's the joke a la Asprin's Myth books). No one is going to spend several hours of their life to read something they've mentally given up on.