Rangel
Member
This topic comes up again and again but I don't recall getting a general consensus on whether S&W factory issue barrels or Stormlake's are better. Seems there are folks who prefer one over the other. What do you think?
The S&W 9mm barrels fit a .40 M&P as well as the aftermarket conversions. That is to say, either may require handfitting to work, and even then are at least a .020 misfit for the 9mm on the .40 extractor.
Usually work well enough for range practice, but personally I would not trust one for protection. Murphy is alive.
By the way, use of caliber change or conversion barrels is prohibited for IDPA/SSP and USPSA Production competition.
What you say above is what I've gathered--that you may get 'lucky' and have the barrel drop right in and shoot well, but there's also a real chance that you may have to go to a gunsmith to 'get it right'. For reasons I don't know, it seems Glock's have a better chance of just dropping in, without requiring additional work.
People have also commented (as above) that for an everyday carry, you're wise to stick with the barrel the firearm came with.
I bought a Storm Lake conversion barrel but it doesn't work due to its rough feed ramp. Ammo sticks to it and jams every time. I've been meaning to sand and polish it but haven't yet. Otherwise, it looks good and fits well. Just haven't been able to shoot it yet. From what I've read, mine may be the exception -- most may be OK.