ContinentalOp
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2009
- Messages
- 6,315
- Reaction score
- 12,813
There's an ammo issue I've been somewhat confused about so I hope someone here can maybe clear it up. I also hope that my somewhat convoluted posting is understood.
It's often recommended to avoid shooting +P ammo in alloy-framed guns that aren't rated for it. But is it really the pressure that's the problem or is it the amount of recoil energy generated?
For example, a common result of extensively shooting +P ammo in a non-+P rated alloy gun is frame stretch. Wouldn't such a condition result from the higher recoil energy generated by the +P ammo? It seems to me that the amount of pressure generated is largely contained within the the cylinder, which, as far as I know, is made of the same steel as steel-framed guns that are OK for shooting +P.
Yet, standard pressure Buffalo Bore ammo produces similar, if not more, recoil energy levels than equivalent +P loadings and are considered safe to use in such guns.
I guess what I'm asking is how does the pressure of the load have more of an impact on the gun's alloy frame than the recoil energy?
It's often recommended to avoid shooting +P ammo in alloy-framed guns that aren't rated for it. But is it really the pressure that's the problem or is it the amount of recoil energy generated?
For example, a common result of extensively shooting +P ammo in a non-+P rated alloy gun is frame stretch. Wouldn't such a condition result from the higher recoil energy generated by the +P ammo? It seems to me that the amount of pressure generated is largely contained within the the cylinder, which, as far as I know, is made of the same steel as steel-framed guns that are OK for shooting +P.
Yet, standard pressure Buffalo Bore ammo produces similar, if not more, recoil energy levels than equivalent +P loadings and are considered safe to use in such guns.
I guess what I'm asking is how does the pressure of the load have more of an impact on the gun's alloy frame than the recoil energy?