Question for the lever gun guys

SAFireman

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,917
Reaction score
16,039
Location
Home of the Alamo
Ok gents,

I have this radical idea......it's not a new idea by any means, but it's one I haven't seen discussed.

There are lots of folks who have lever guns that match their pistol - 38/357, 41 Mag, 44-40/44spl/44mag and 45 Colt, but has anyone given real serious thought to a chambering in 45acp, 38 Super, or the like?

I love to carry my 1911's, they are slim, lighter than a double stack anything. I have seen ads to convert Marlins to 45acp and they just don't really float my boat. Has anyone seen and/or shot one in 38 Super/9x23?

I think that may be the 'new' ranch rifle alternative....The Coonan 357 is intriguing, but seems like a novelty in these parts...

Don't get me wrong, the Marlin 41 Mag gets the job done, but carrying the 58,57, and/or 657 sticks out in town. The 1911 hides better among the otherwise law-abiding sheeple of the neighboring community when I need to fill up on farm diesel, or buy batteries for the deer feeders....or get a fresh cooked meal in town.

Any of you fellas have any real world input to share?

I think that a 38 Super (9x23) would be really something out of a 16" barrel ;)

Thanks in advance.

ETA - yeah, I know that Colt made a 38 spl 1911, but is designed around a wadcutter & a light target load. That's a great deal for paper punching, but won't cut the mustard for feral hogs, deer, and 2-legged snakes that we are seeing out in the brush of S Texas.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I think all lever gun cartridges chamber on the rim of the case. 45 ACP chambers on the case mouth. Therefore i think its impossible to make something like what your talking about. I might be wrong but to my understanding of how cartridges chamber i think thats why. Revolvers are different as you can use moon clips
 
I don't know why this is, but I am unaware of any tubular magazine firearm that Chambers a rimless cartridge. And since rimless cartridges have been around for more than a hundred years, if it was a possibility, it seems like somebody would have done it already.
 
I like the idea of a bolt action carbine with interchangeable barrels for 9MMP, 38 Super, 9x23, then 45ACP/45 WinMag, using M1911 magazines.
As noted, a lever gun for rimless cartridges would require a major redesign.
 
Pretty much anything CAN be done with application of sufficient time, money, and engineering, but I think if this were practical it would probably have been done and we'd know about it. Seems like it would almost have to headspace on the mouth of the case to provide a consistent place for the extractor to locate, and we're aware of the inherent problems with case mouth head spacing.
 
I have a Marlin Camp Carbine in 45 ACP. It uses 1911 magazines so it is a pretty good companion to a 1911. I also have a Thompson 1927 . I have dreamed about having a 16 inch barrel and a shoulder stock made for a Colt 1917 so you could use 45 moon clips in pistol and carbine.
 
Last edited:
Am I missing something here? Can't you just have a barrel chambered such that the cartridge headspaces like it does in a 1911 barrel? A little redesign of the breech end to accommodate a modified extractor and voilà. I would imagine the rimless cartridge would slide out of the mag tube, carry up on the lifter and into the chamber rather nicely. Imagine how many of the short, fat .45 auto rounds you could stuff in the mag tube? I like this idea. I like this thread.
 
One of the best of the gunwriters, C.E. Harris, wrote up a brief piece on a lever-action gun (maybe a Marlin) that had been professionally converted to .45 ACP. I read the article in AMERICAN RIFLEMAN when Harris was on the Technical Staff there thirty-five or forty years ago and don't remember much about it. However, I seem to recall this wasn't a particularly easy conversion for the gunsmith.
 
This shop will do it for you.

The Cowboy Shop By Chuckaroo

I believe the Cody rifle are set up NOT to feed ball ammo.

I remember a lot of discussions on the topic a few years ago. There are concerns about ball ammo being used and causing detonation in the magazine. Of course, bullet shape is a concern for any caliber when loaded in a tube magazine. I remember someone pointing out that a rimless cartridge is a greater concern, because rimmed cartridges actually have a tendency to be tilted in the magazine (bullet nose down, rimmed base up), while a rimless cartridge would be more in alignment.

I have no real-world experience with .45 acp in lever guns. Just passing along what I have heard.
 
A company called Grizzly something or other makes custom caliber lever guns, or they did. Seems like they made the 45 acp and 10mm guns out of your rifle. There may be others out there doing it as well.

I'd love to have one in 38 super to go with my 1943 1911 Super 38. And a 10mm to go with my 610.

I'll probably just have to settle with my .357 and .45 colt combos though.
 
A company called Grizzly something or other makes custom caliber lever guns, or they did. Seems like they made the 45 acp and 10mm guns out of your rifle. There may be others out there doing it as well.

I'd love to have one in 38 super to go with my 1943 1911 Super 38. And a 10mm to go with my 610.

I'll probably just have to settle with my .357 and .45 colt combos though.

I was very specifically thinking about the Marlin 1894 series in 38/357 firing a 38 super +P, or 9x23 since they are semi-rimmed. I have heard of folks shooting 38 Super +p in their 357 mags and some other worthy 38 specials.

I have seen the 45 ACP conversions, and they can still be had, but they are expensive.

The idea of the Super round in the the Marlin 1894 with a 16" barrel gives me the giggles right now :D
 
If it's just something you want to do, and you have the funds and the time to wait for it, then what you're proposing can be done. However, I think the amount of time and money will be more than you might like. I say, buy 3 guns. A rifle/revolver combo for field work and a 1911 for going into town. One assumes that since you're concealing the handgun, you won't be carrying a long gun into the feed store. Without the long gun, the need for common ammo isn't there. Different tools for different jobs. JMHO.
 
If it's just something you want to do, and you have the funds and the time to wait for it, then what you're proposing can be done. However, I think the amount of time and money will be more than you might like. I say, buy 3 guns. A rifle/revolver combo for field work and a 1911 for going into town. One assumes that since you're concealing the handgun, you won't be carrying a long gun into the feed store. Without the long gun, the need for common ammo isn't there. Different tools for different jobs. JMHO.

Funny you should mention that. I have been carrying the Super 38 around while filling deer feeders (not hunting hogs, or hanging around at night), and part of those duties includes running into town for dyed diesel for tractors and such and deer corn, of course. The lever gun rides between the DS front seat and the console (I am never out of sight of that truck while it is in town).

I figured that it would serve double duty and not look TOO tactical as some of my duties include travel into Uvalde, which is still hyper-sensitive to AR's. Not that anyone would see it in town, but if they did get a glimpse, then it wouldn't get the 'OMG - man with a GUN call to the local PD, SO, DPS, CBP, ect). The Commander is easily covered with a Mossy Oak fishing shirt or Wrangler tan button down.
 
A MArlin 94 in 38/357 might come very close to feeding/firing 38Super right as it is.
The semi-rimmed 38S does HS on that very small rim. The OAL of the 38S might be a problem in feeding.
Using the orig bolt face with it's extractor for the 38/357 might need alteration for best extraction/ejection with the smaller 38Super cart base,,maybe not all that much though.

The orig bbl specs being 38spcl/357 might not give the best accuracy for the slightly smaller 38Super bullet.
But some simple try-outs before any full out conversion attempts would tell if the project was going to be a money and time pit or not.

Take a few 38Spcl or 357 cartridges and make a semi-rimmed version out of them.
A case w/ head specs like the 38Super with it's semi rim.

Then try that 38spcl or 357 semi-rim round through the action and see how it/they feed/eject, etc.

The orig Marlin used to feed correctly on the right OAL of the cartridges.
Too short and the next one in the tube would get partially onto the carrier as well and jam the action
Too long and the cartridge would not clear the magazine tube and would jam the action.

Shorter cart like the 38Super would likely need carrier work to get feeding right.
I'm not familiar with the newer 94's to know if they have in place a system that allows various OAL cart to be used w/o a probl.
That would elliminate a big issue.

Just some ideas..
Projects are like that.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why this is, but I am unaware of any tubular magazine firearm that Chambers a rimless cartridge. And since rimless cartridges have been around for more than a hundred years, if it was a possibility, it seems like somebody would have done it already.

Marlin 336 in 35 Remington.
 
I would love a lever gun in .45acp. Think about how many rounds it would hold?

It would be awesome.
 
I think the answer is simple, if it was financially feasible for a gun manufacturer to do so and make money they would already be on the market. As it is, it seems they can't make enough .38/.357 lever guns to satisfy the demand.
 
I don't know why this is, but I am unaware of any tubular magazine firearm that Chambers a rimless cartridge. And since rimless cartridges have been around for more than a hundred years, if it was a possibility, it seems like somebody would have done it already.

Remington 14 and Remington 141 have tube magazines and were chambered for several rimless cartridges. There may other such guns as well.
 
Remington 14 and Remington 141 have tube magazines and were chambered for several rimless cartridges. There may other such guns as well.

Those were bottleneck rounds and headspace on the shoulder.

"The semi-rimmed 38S does HS on that very small rim. The OAL of the 38S might be a problem in feeding."

Modern .38 Super pistols headspace on the case mouth. Traditionally, the .38 Super was not known for accuracy because the very small rim caused poor HS. Once the change was made, accuracy was on par with other standard pistol rounds.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top