Quick, before I commit to buying an M640 PRO

[1sailor]

I'll try to make this story short. I've owned an M&P340 for about 5 years. Never did any shooting with it at ranges over about 25ft. Last week I was out shooting a couple of other .357's at my standard range of 20 meters and decided to put the last 20 rounds through the M&P. These were not full house magnums but are loaded about midway between .38+P and entry level Magnum. I wasn't expecting much but to my surprise the first 5 rounds went into a very decent group although about 3" right and a little low. Adjusting my hold on the target I put the next 15 into the black in a cluster that could be covered by a dollar bill folded in half. I thought that was pretty decent for such a light, short barreled pistol at that range. This was all done from a sitting position with my knees supporting the pistol, not offhand. Anyway it really got me to wondering what one of the M640 PRO's would be capable of. Especially since (I'm assuming anyway) the PRO would be adjustable for windage. It could be a pretty easily carried woods gun as well as being my carry piece. I'm sure there must be some guys here that own one of these. What's your take on them. If I like it I would probably give the M&P to my son since everyone needs a .357 of some kind.

 

[TAC]

I highly recommend it! I have a 640-3 (not a PRO), that I carry everyday! It's awesome!

If you can handle a slightly larger, heavier revolver, I'd also recommend the 686 PLUS (7-shot) 2.5". Even more awesome!

 

[Big Cholla]

I can't recommend the M 640 Pro enough. Great night sights, barrel length and box stock trigger pull. I put an Uncle Mike's boot grip on mine and immediately felt at home. It is very accurate with most any ammo. Conceals very easily. The ergonomics (for me) are spot on for fast acquisition of the target. I am thrilled that I have one. ........

 

[HOUSTON RICK]

Why not get a 640?

 

[1sailor]

My main reason for wanting the PRO version is because of the sights. Nothing against the standard version but I don't feel like it gives me anything over the M&P that I have now. Well, other than the fact that I would likely shoot the all steel revolver more. The 686 mentioned by Tac is a lot heavier. I have a 2.5" model 66 that is great in the woods but too heavy for carry. At least compared to a J frame.

 

[629shooter]

I'd keep the M&P340, and buy a 640 Pro to go with it. Besides, you can't have to many J-frames.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

 

[Beancounter81]

I have a M640 Pro and love it. The sights are great and I actually use the moonclips (I know people have strong opinions pro and con about moonclips so not trying to start a war). It's an accurate gun and one that won't beat you up in a range session due to the extra weight of the steel frame. Go for it - you won't regret it.

 

[HOGSTR]

I am very interested in this gun, too...especially for the sight configuration. I think it has the potential to be one of those guns that everyone wants 15 years from now but nobody can find. Similar to the current market for the no dash 696.

 

[madmikeb]

Count me in as another fan of the 640 Pro. I have had mine for a few years, and it was love at first sight!

I don't know if it was the no lock, the concealed hammer, the sights, or the cut for moonclips, (and I do use them), but I think Smith hit the jackpot with this one.

This is the only gun I carry in hot weather. When the jackets and coats come out in the fall I switch to a PC 686 2.5" 7 shot that's also cut for moonclips.

With these two guns my 1911's and pocket autos are semi retired. I've come to the conclusion that I'm a die hard revolver shooter!

 

[629shooter]

I am very interested in this gun, too...especially for the sight configuration. I think it has the potential to be one of those guns that everyone wants 15 years from now but nobody can find. Similar to the current market for the no dash 696.

That's a good point.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

 

[Stopsign32v]

I am very interested in this gun, too...especially for the sight configuration. I think it has the potential to be one of those guns that everyone wants 15 years from now but nobody can find. Similar to the current market for the no dash 696.

Out of curiosity can you tell me why you think the 640 PRO will in 15 years be like the 696 is now?

 

[two-bit cowboy]

The all dressed up and ready to go pair

DON'T get rid of your M&P 340...

DO get a 640 Pro.

The triggers on my pair are nearly identical (fresh out of the box, the factory replaced the one on my Pro -- it's great now). The Pro's extra 10 ounces makes a positive difference in control and feel, but I don't notice a difference in my OWB Lobo leather.

I'm one who simply can't gush all over the Pro's sights compared to the 340's. In a pitch dark room the Pro wins, otherwise I actually prefer the 340's sight picture.

The Pro replaced the 340 as my all-the-time ccw and night stand gun, but I still add the 340 to my kit when I head into bear country. Both pack Barnes 140gr lead-free magnums.

 

[Stopsign32v]

DON'T get rid of your M&P 340...

DO get a 640 Pro.

The triggers on my pair are nearly identical (fresh out of the box, the factory replaced the one on my Pro -- it's great now). The Pro's extra 10 ounces makes a positive difference in control and feel, but I don't notice a difference in my OWB Lobo leather.

I'm one who simply can't gush all over the Pro's sights compared to the 340's. In a pitch dark room the Pro wins, otherwise I actually prefer the 340's sight picture.

The Pro replaced the 340 as my all-the-time ccw and night stand gun, but I still add the 340 to my kit when I head into bear country. Both pack Barnes 140gr lead-free magnums.

Those sure are some attractive J frames

 

[Macinaw]

Buy the 640 Pro! And keep the 340.

 

[Stopsign32v]

^ What is the 2nd from the left?

 

[Macinaw]

^ What is the 2nd from the left?

Model 63 eight shot 22lr 3inch J frame


From left to right.

Model 632 Pro
Model 63
Model 340 PD
Model M&P 340
Model 640 Pro

 

[GTBL]

My LGS has the 640 pro for $789.00. Is this a good price?

 

[Stopsign32v]

My LGS has the 640 pro for $789.00. Is this a good price?

No not really

 

[Edmo]

My 640 Pro is now a good revolver...

It and my 642 are my two favorite J-frames.

I say "now" because it took four trips back to the mothership and two new barrels to get it to send bullets where the sights point.

This isn't an indictment of the model or design, but rather a caution to the state of current build quality in Springfield.

Again, the 640 Pro is the J-frame perfected.

Edmo

 

[bronco45]

Have owned many J frames since 1972. My favorite all time J is the 640Pro.