Rastoff's Challenge- Dropping the Gauntlet

I finally got out to do this, used my Bulgy Makarov and 95gr ball ammo from American Eagle, it avg'd 1019fps 5 shot avg over the chrono today.
image.jpg

3yrds
image.jpg


5yrds

image.jpg


7yrds

image.jpg


10yrds

image.jpg


ec5d216fb852f8fecbf9dc7083eed478_zps2hpmmt55.jpg


Yes, the outlier was the last shot, and yes I DA'ed first shot at each distance.

image.jpg
 
Last edited:
3e493c450548579c2e16592f747cbd85.jpg


All shots were from 7 yards the minimum. About shot 14 the dot would not stop dancing even in the 10 ring. Once I threw one out, I stopped and tried 2 more targets.

I fired the last 20 of the box at a bullseye 7,7,7 and 10 yards for about 4".
Once I got to 10 yards I would have been better off using the sights instead of trying to make the laser hold still.

I now feel much closer to my LW officers ACP.

Thanks for the challenge
David
 
Last edited:
This has been fun, but I think it's run its course. With the exception of one little bump, the entire thread has been fun.

I will put up more in the future. I intend to develop more shooting scenarios for my class. I will vet them through you guys.

You did great, I enjoyed following it... like you said.. one bump in the road and you ran over it.. :D I'm with you.
 
Since my last tries were such a mess, and I was in a sort of mood that if said would get me a ding, I went to the range yesterday.

Took out the Sig C3 and ran the routine again. I've swapped out the 9mm for a new one, so no comparison there. But here is my "by the rules" result with 230g FMJ.
 

Attachments

  • rastoff final_b.jpg
    rastoff final_b.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 46
I measured your group hoc9sw, but I'm not sure it's exactly correct. Here's what I got:

hoc9sw%20measured_zpsp5s99eb8.jpg


The way the software works is through using actual bullet diameter. This way it can calculate the center-to-center distance between the two furthest holes (represented by the black straight line between two of the drawn holes). The .45ACP is actually .451" or .452" in diameter. The actual measurement of bullet diameter isn't critical as long as you're able to put the virtual hole centered around the actual hole.

In order for the software to do this, it must be calibrated for each picture. This is done using a known reference in the picture itself. hoc9sw has given us the relevant reference.

As you can see, the largest distance is not always obvious. I would have thought the top most hole and the bottom most hole would have made the group. In this group though, those aren't the largest distance.

The challenge in this particular target is how the holes were made. I'll bet he used hardball ammo and didn't have a backer behind the target. This makes for lots of tearing. It's difficult to place the holes correctly on such a target. I did my best to get them centered over the holes, but may not have got it right.

Also, the type of paper makes a big difference. Notice the clean holes in DavidR's target just a couple posts above. He's using a different type of paper and what looks like wad cutter bullets. Those rounds are great for both target competition and self-defense. Very accurate and transfer energy almost as well as hollow points.

Anyone that wants to try this software for themselves can get it here: On Target Precision Calculator There is a free version, which is what I've been using, and a much better one for about $12 (I'm just really cheap). It really is good software and will give you the actual results rather than guessing. It's also very easy to use. If I can do it, you can do it.
 
You are correct. Cheap paper, top pin only, no backing, 230gr FMJ (Herters from Cabela's). The range has a bit of draft, as needed to clear smoke, so the target will tend to float away from the shooter, leaving a slight angle.

But the big factor for the day was that I was so wound up that I didn't notice the arthritis pain as much as usual.
 
Was this a good thing? Pain is a terrible thing. I don't know what it's like to have arthritis, but I can imagine it's terrible.

The group is good.

There are days that I have trouble holding a coffee cup. And days I go to the range with several calibers, but wind up shooting only the .22.

I start with a mag or two through the .22 compact. If it really bothers me, I stay with that. If it is just annoyance, I'll go to a .45. When I get to the point I can't rack it without issue, I pack up and go home.

There have been days I considered not shooting at all, but then there would be the wasted gas ...:eek:

The earlier I go, the better chance I'll enjoy it, but work gets in the way.

Not sure how I managed that group. Haven't done that well in months. But then for years that would have been unthinkably bad.
 
Don't sell yourself short. Those are never "unthinkably" bad. You put 20 rounds not just close to each other, but very close to the center of the target. In defensive shooting, that's a saved love one or another day above ground for yourself. Well done!
 
If it's not flooding in Georgia tomorrow I'll give this a try. This will give me an excuse to get some .41 Magnums to the range.
 
Looks like I have to withdraw my statement to "pick up the gauntlet". Health issues became front and center shortly there after I accepted the challenge. Maybe after this issue is resolved, with the Lord's help, I'll pickup where I left off.

Joe
 
I shot the challenge today with an M&P Shield 40cal. This is only the third time I have shot this gun and really haven't spent much time at the range for the last year or so, so I am fairly pleased with the results. Each square is 1"X1"

de2313e6199e61f662000cdddf6af667.jpg



Then I shot it with my son's Sig sp2022, this was the first time I ever shot this gun and I didn't do too terribly, but at least I beat him...

a1f41893ff6b1bb00a96c128a689d43e.jpg
 
Back
Top