Relying on a vintage firearm for SD/EDC

Some posters have used the word "modern" as though it were a good thing. It is not. It can be good, bad, or indifferent. Anyone here who knows much about guns and their use knows that there are guns produced within the last twenty years that are inferior, slightly superior, and on a par with guns produced within the last one hundred and twenty years.

Attempting to classify guns by age is ageism, and no woke individual would be a party to it.
 
I rotate between three J frame snubs. The eldest is a Baby Chief and the newest a M49 from the early 1980's, I don't have carry worries with any of them.
 
When I retired, I decided to continue carrying the sidearm I carried as my primary off duty firearm, my Glock 32 in .357 Sig. I had also qualified with an Sig P365 and chose to continue with it as well.

It was a choice just to continue with the ones I have trusted for several years.

For my purpose, it remains about the cartridge. I have several older models that I would comfortably carry but I believe in the old saying "Dance with one you came with."
 
Disqualifying a gun as a carry gun due to its age is just plain stupid. Some folks carry this "Junior G Man", "Tacticool" **** just a little bit too far. We are talking about guns, not mayonnaise. They don't spoil.

Some of the best guns mankind ever has, or ever will see was made seventy to a hundred years ago. If it is in good shape and reliable there is no reason to disqualify it.

You don't need fifteen or even twenty shots. You need one placed in the right place. Some folks need to quit standing at the three yard line while they spray and pray with their twenty round magazines. They need to step out to the twenty-five yard line and teach themselves to actually shoot, one round at a time. I know that "Call of Duty" and other such video games would have you believing that if you lay down a barrage of fire with the latest plastic wonder you are one Hell of an "operator". But you might want to read about the philosophy of people like Wyatt Earp, Frank Hamer, Wild Bill Hickok, or more recently Bill Jordan. All people who spent very little time fantasizing about gun fights because they were actually in them and won. They will tell you, to a man, that the way to survive a gun fight is to put one shot exactly where it needs to go, and have the sack to stand there, maybe even take a bullet, while you line up your shot, and put the guy in front of you down. If you can't do both of these, you probably ought to stay out of gun fights. You are not going to get to hit the "replay" button and do it again. And, you don't need a twenty shot magazine to do this. These guys would tell you that by the time you get to round three you are probably already dead.

Sorry. Had to get it off my chest. If you disagree, that's fine. I am not responsible for your safety.
I believe it was Col Cooper who said " if you can't stop a couple goblins with 7 rounds you don't need more ammo, you need to learn to shoot". In the most litigious society in history I strongly question why anyone would think "spray and pray" is a good idea. One accurate shot will beat twenty in the general direction every single time.
 
I don't carry it per say but would have no issue defending myself with my M1 carbine made in 1943. Or my 1955 Garand for that matter.

But my home defense is a Tisas GI style M1911A1. Obviously it is new but I have heard GI 1911s lambasted as having "no sights" and being borderline "unshootable". All a load of drivel.
 
I believe it was Col Cooper who said " if you can't stop a couple goblins with 7 rounds you don't need more ammo, you need to learn to shoot". In the most litigious society in history I strongly question why anyone would think "spray and pray" is a good idea. One accurate shot will beat twenty in the general direction every single time.

And brother, make mine a .45.

Even 230 grain ball has an excellent track record. Maybe not on paper, maybe not in jello, but by the men that had to use it in the gravest extreme it has proven time and time again to do the job very well with good shot placement. I don't ever recall hearing complaints about the abilities of .45 ACP hardball by those that actually have "been there done that" in the real world.

That and the trigger of an M1911A1 and its handling characteristics make it an accurate and effective sidearm, even today. Even the basic USGI standard pistols are still excellent weapons.
 
Last edited:
My record is carrying 117 year old S&W .38 Hammerless . First 5 rounds I fired from it went 5 for 5 on 8 inch steel plate rack @ 18 yards , one handed . Much better practical accuracy and more power than any pocket .380 .
 
One of these 45 ACP revolvers is an 84 year old relic. The other is much more recent Scandium, rail having fanciness. The weird thing is that the relic has been more reliable and trouble free than the newer one. Also, any target I ever shot with the two can't seem to show or tell the difference.

As has been stated so often it's more important that a chosen firearm be well designed and in good condition in my considered opinion...

..
 

Attachments

  • 20230722_185443.jpg
    20230722_185443.jpg
    251.5 KB · Views: 10
  • 20220418_142750.jpg
    20220418_142750.jpg
    119 KB · Views: 7
As long as the firearm functions reliably, has sufficient power, and I can repeatedly shoot it well under stress, then I don't think its "vintage" is all that important.

On the other hand, if I do have to use it in justifiable defense, would I rather the police confiscate as evidence my 1967 FN Browning High Power or my 2022 S&W SD9?
 
As long as the firearm functions reliably, has sufficient power, and I can repeatedly shoot it well under stress, then I don't think its "vintage" is all that important.

On the other hand, if I do have to use it in justifiable defense, would I rather the police confiscate as evidence my 1967 FN Browning High Power or my 2022 S&W SD9?

I do not want the police to confiscate anything, as I don't want to have to shoot anyone. However, if I do have to defend my family or myself. I will have no compunctions about using anything I own to get the job done.
 
Wouldn't carry a vintage firearm as an edc. Guess I'm cheap. My usual carry guns are both lightweights, a Colt Mustang and a J Frame. Not too pretty but they work.
 
Back
Top