Ruger trying to compete with SD's

To be honest, I wish all semi-autos came with three magazines.

That would be nice! I'm glad that S&W usually provides two magazines! (I don't think the BG380 comes with two, does it?) I just don't understand how any gun maker could think of sending out a gun with only one magazine...other than a 1911, that is. Most 1911 owners will buy different magazines anyway, but for most other non-1911 pistols, there aren't any other choices.
 
That would be nice! I'm glad that S&W usually provides two magazines! (I don't think the BG380 comes with two, does it?) I just don't understand how any gun maker could think of sending out a gun with only one magazine...other than a 1911, that is. Most 1911 owners will buy different magazines anyway, but for most other non-1911 pistols, there aren't any other choices.

They would have to increase the price if they include more mags. Think less mags means a lower MSRP. Then they can turn around and sell you a mag for $30. :o
 
The Ruger has a nice trigger. However, with one less magazine and roughly $50 more, that still will give the edge to SD in terms of value. People will definitely consider that when shopping. These aren't $1200 guns, little things count.

Refardless, the SD trigger isn't terrible as everyone says. I can achieve reasonable groups at a fair distance. If the trigger was that bad and I couldn't put shots where they need to go I wouldn't still have the gun.



Sent from my SGH-T769 using Tapatalk 2
 

Latest posts

Back
Top